QUAD DOMAINS
Established Member
- Impact
- 502
Let's balance the scales here a bit. We constantly read/hear the classification of domain names as "good" or "bad". Never do we read/hear about "people in the domain industry" being classified as good or bad.
Because good and bad run parallel with morals and ethics, which both shape industry culture, it's appropriate they be used to classify people who play a role in shaping the industry itself.
So, the question is:
Does the centralized domain industry, in its current state, TOLERATE 'good character' or 'bad character'?
Domain sales history and accolades should NOT be factored in this one. Focus on investor behavior, engagement style and known business practices. (Note: Downvoting this thread counts as a vote for "It tolerates the good and favors the bad".)
Let's hear it.
Because good and bad run parallel with morals and ethics, which both shape industry culture, it's appropriate they be used to classify people who play a role in shaping the industry itself.
So, the question is:
Does the centralized domain industry, in its current state, TOLERATE 'good character' or 'bad character'?
Domain sales history and accolades should NOT be factored in this one. Focus on investor behavior, engagement style and known business practices. (Note: Downvoting this thread counts as a vote for "It tolerates the good and favors the bad".)
Let's hear it.