- Hello ,evey domainers
- NFT domain name transaction volume has increased recently, and its price also keeps rising
- When did NFT become popular?
- Did you take the chance?If not ,will you buy a NFT domain?
- let`s talk about it ,thanks in advance
Yes, you are right.Just make sure the keywords work in this niche, random words or letters are a waste of money. Always put yourself in the shoes of the end-user. Ask yourself if you would brand your own company around that name??
Buy on the aftermarket, anything worth having has already been registered.
Filing date.Would they be counting on the filling date (March 9) or the date the tm for granted?
Surely it can, just not very likely in relation to NFT goods or services (unless a company builds a famous mark around the NFT keyword).I dont think the term NFT can be trademarked.
Surely it can, just not very likely in relation to NFT goods or services (unless a company builds a famous mark around the NFT keyword).
Exactly, I ment NFT as Non-fungible token/s. Although Bitcoin is a trademark so ....Surely it can, just not very likely in relation to NFT goods or services (unless a company builds a famous mark around the NFT keyword).
Any word in theory can be granted a trademark to a company.
But they would have a very hard task suing someone for owning a domain name based just on having "nft" in the url.
NFT has been such a phenomenon that they can't create complete rights to the acronym that will give them exclusivity to sue anyone using the acronym "nft" and win.
It's almost like VR now. People can apply for a "VR" trademark but domain owners would not have to constantly worry about owning a domain name with "vr" in it.
Yes there are many factors that can bring you in line to be successfully sued by this company. But by just having "nft" in a url on its own merit should not be one of them.
* I am not a lawyer but that's how my take on this matter is. I could be wrong however.
I am always open to be educated.
Well in theory yes.
But what I am saying is that in Law School you'll learn that - unless you have a famous trademark - you cannot succesfully uphold rights to a trademark in court should the the mark be discriptive of the goods or services you are offering in relation to that mark.
What I am not saying is that this means you cannot trademark a generic/deiscriptive word like, say Apple. You can, as long as you are not offering apples or services related to apples. This would only be differtent if you have put a lot of effort in building a business for these goods or services using the mark Apple. In fact only when the majority of people (be it or not in a certain jurisdiction) would associate Apple with offereing apples or services in relation to apples, hence making it a famous mark.
The World’s First NFT House Is Now for Sale
https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/world-first-nft-house-now-230000169.html
I have NiftyDisplays.com & NiftyDisplay.comA sale from DNJ
NFTDisplays.com
$13,000
Did you take the chance?If not ,will you buy a NFT domain?
Found MetaFlat.com and MetaFlats.comThe World’s First NFT House Is Now for Sale
https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/world-first-nft-house-now-230000169.html
Anyone who thinks digital collectibles will just go away is being incredibly short-sighted, and maybe missed the boat. All the recent excitement might seem sudden and maybe a bit ridiculous, but NFTs / digital collectible assets have been on the verge of a breakout for years!
Yep, and anyone who thinks that some of these NFT are not beanie babies are short-sighted as well.
It is exactly like the ICO stuff a couple years ago. Most of the coins are complete crap now.
Long term some assets will be good, some will be crap.
Absolutely, just like purely physical collectibles too, be it those beanie babies or a mickey mantle rookie card.
Possibly, but the difference with nfts is that they are unique, collectible, and something is actually owned rather than just blanket financing some concept of a company that never sees the light of day. Often there is utility too them as well, but that could change as defi and nfts start to merge and they become more of a startup financing mechanism. Those types of nfts would likely follow the ICO route and really should be in a separate class of their own.
Sounds logical. That's how most new spaces go, similar to the .com bubble in 2000. Lots of excitement, huge investments initially with little basis and tons of excitement, then it levels out, and the ones with real lasting value survive. NFTs minted by already established brands like Atari, Topps, etc.. and especially ones that offer some form of utility with something people are already familiar with, will be some of the most exciting ones to watch imo.
Seth Godin did publish a piece recently that he sees NFTs as a dangerous trap.
I won't participate in the trend. As said above, the really top tier names were taken years ago. I think there will be some interesting sales in this segment for a while, then it will pass as most trends do. Kudos to those that saw this coming a few years ago.