You're repeating the same misunderstanding that I clarified already in this thread but that's fine, I can do this again. It's the holidays and I have nothing better to do right now.
If I'm mistaken, please quote me where I've said that XR names should be limited to only B2B related domains? All of that is in your head. What I have said though is that at this moment it's a riskier bet to register names that are
consumer marketing words, because they are unaware of the term and has no reason to, because most people still haven't even heard of augmented reality is. MS is pushing mixed reality and ML will be harder soon, but there's no evidence (that I've seen or heard) of that term sticking to consumers either. And as I've clearly stated in the past already,
that's not to say that it won't happen at any point in the future. I'm just saying that there is no evidence that it will. That said, I have been regging consumer names that could apply to both AR AND VR just in case to be on the safe side in case it does become a consumer term, because no one has a crystal ball.
I think you are replying to what you thought I was saying but I think you have a slight misunderstanding.
Here's the basic point of my post, which was mostly an reply to the name showcased above it and many others I've seen not on this forum.
If you want to take that risk of regging a consumer term like RACING for example, close your eyes and imagine if the domain could represent sonething that could be done in both AR and VR. If you can see a racing game that can be played in AR and VR that's great and maybe I have a lack of imagination. We are all supposed to use our own judgement, but using mine I don't see how XR is being used in a way that makes the most sense.
I have GirlfriendXR / com (told you guys this already), XRGames / org and XRCasinos / org. Girlfriends in VR and AR is very conceivable and will be encouraged if not already happening. There is and will be more organizations for casinos and gaming companies in XR, why not? As you said, casino games will be in AR and VR, it's why I own OnlineARCasino(s) /com and the same in VR on dot net. Some consumer keywords are meant for XR while others are questionable. And there will certainly be games that can be played in all realities.
If volumetric p**n takes off then even XR P**n could make more sense as a term if consumers catch on to what the other Realities are and become familiar with XR as a term. I've seen some very convincing videos lately and I sent a link to Elad.
Some would say that it's a given. I'm not entirely sure yet, but when I do take a risk with consumer keywords I'm going to ask myself if it's applicable first instead of just throwing any word on the back of XR. I am not the first person to say this @NamePov. This was even said in the VR thread but you can't stop people from throwing their money away...
