- Impact
- 645
Friends, to comply with the hopes of the Admin, I am reposting an essay I wrote in its entiriety here, for NamePros, that I wrote in early spring - may make some version evolvements on this later, if it's meant to be
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
..why I am opposed to the mobile browser defaulting to .mobi
(to be posted in full on InternetHumanRights.com)
Globalization - Not black and white, right? There is good globalization and bad globalization.. Groups are up in arms about this.. and most of us are looking for solutions for peace, right?
Privatization - Usually associated with corporate domination globally, imperialism.. and even associated traditionally with "globalization"..
The Internet - Here is where the world financial system comes full circle.. Where globalization actually means NO privatization of the internet (several intranets with loss of the One).. but internet globalization means an internet socialism for all fair public access..
First look at those sports phones.. where the idea means that they want to proliferate a sports intranet.. (though groups like the CIA have their own intranet..) this is the very principle that goes against One World Internet for the people that ICANN is battling for.. think about it.. the risk to humanity if we lose one central internet to several private intranets..
Then humanity will be set back for a long time.. we would have to wait for capitalism of countless years for one main internet to emerge again via a monopoly under the radar.. for there to be one internet again.. Marxism..
Now, though today, we ALReAdY have one internet..stemming from its infancy.. So the battle is to not lose the One Internet for humanity.. preserve it or lose it to several intranets .. and lose global human closeness integral for global living.. it's dangerous, frankly (look at all the people blowing up bombs in part over the notion of "imperialism of parent privatization impositions". What if you were to woven the fabric of the future global economy on such?).
So MTLD.mobi is pushing for automatic mobile browser defaulting to the Dot Mobi? This is risking humanity and the One Internet! Are they trying to play Constantine and change the Bible?
I applaud my Microsoft Internet Explorer for NOT defaulting to a Dot Com when I type in a word.. Remember the days of AOL keywords? Are they (any extension browser default pushers stampeding on the other domain extensions) trying to have people search "Jesus", peace be upon him, term in the search engine and only have Catholic come out? What about Ukranian, Church of England, Gospel of Thomas, Muslim writings on Jesus? No you can't trademark or patent this Bible. No one should have such an advantage over the others.. this is where equal footing socialism of the internet has been evolving.. ironically, the internet (and its economy) is where "globalization" means actually socialism - it's flipping; and, several private intranets (privatization) is actually backwards and power monger dictatorships..
The domain name is the one tech thing that I see as not going obsolete for lifetimes foreseeable.. between the human being and the computer network.. the domain name is the central mode of communication that will be the least to go as obsolete.. we must preserve the "prefix.suffix" for typing in, period. Nothing should jip this or threaten this.. keystrokes --> computers (and together with voice)..
-An automatic Dot Mobi default on the mobile browser would be unfair to the other domain extensions (what's next a .tel default? or .com.cn default phone? aka.. several intranets..)
-An automatic Dot Mobi default on the mobile browser would be unfair to the people.. defiling principles of a higher good for humanity..
Can China, and others yet, join us as ONE?
I am for the higher good of both the immediate and long term perspective advocacy at the same time..
That means "NO" to the automatic Dot Mobi default by the mobile browser by MTLD Dot Mobi business consortium power..
I am WorldRadio.mobi, I am heavily invested in Dot Mobi; but, I believe in Internet Human Rights principles.. I am under Judgement by higher powers.. and so is humanity..
... and I know alot of influential people read the forums that are not posting; so, I will raise these issues so we can all go faster in thought.. and to raise grassroots awareness of a potentially impending intention being spun by the powerful that is actually against human progress..
-----
Friends, in short,
EVERYTHING for the love of God
Interfaith ministry following online and in real life at http://lovegodlovelife.com
Kind Regards,
Yelo
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
..why I am opposed to the mobile browser defaulting to .mobi
(to be posted in full on InternetHumanRights.com)
Globalization - Not black and white, right? There is good globalization and bad globalization.. Groups are up in arms about this.. and most of us are looking for solutions for peace, right?
Privatization - Usually associated with corporate domination globally, imperialism.. and even associated traditionally with "globalization"..
The Internet - Here is where the world financial system comes full circle.. Where globalization actually means NO privatization of the internet (several intranets with loss of the One).. but internet globalization means an internet socialism for all fair public access..
First look at those sports phones.. where the idea means that they want to proliferate a sports intranet.. (though groups like the CIA have their own intranet..) this is the very principle that goes against One World Internet for the people that ICANN is battling for.. think about it.. the risk to humanity if we lose one central internet to several private intranets..
Then humanity will be set back for a long time.. we would have to wait for capitalism of countless years for one main internet to emerge again via a monopoly under the radar.. for there to be one internet again.. Marxism..
Now, though today, we ALReAdY have one internet..stemming from its infancy.. So the battle is to not lose the One Internet for humanity.. preserve it or lose it to several intranets .. and lose global human closeness integral for global living.. it's dangerous, frankly (look at all the people blowing up bombs in part over the notion of "imperialism of parent privatization impositions". What if you were to woven the fabric of the future global economy on such?).
So MTLD.mobi is pushing for automatic mobile browser defaulting to the Dot Mobi? This is risking humanity and the One Internet! Are they trying to play Constantine and change the Bible?
I applaud my Microsoft Internet Explorer for NOT defaulting to a Dot Com when I type in a word.. Remember the days of AOL keywords? Are they (any extension browser default pushers stampeding on the other domain extensions) trying to have people search "Jesus", peace be upon him, term in the search engine and only have Catholic come out? What about Ukranian, Church of England, Gospel of Thomas, Muslim writings on Jesus? No you can't trademark or patent this Bible. No one should have such an advantage over the others.. this is where equal footing socialism of the internet has been evolving.. ironically, the internet (and its economy) is where "globalization" means actually socialism - it's flipping; and, several private intranets (privatization) is actually backwards and power monger dictatorships..
The domain name is the one tech thing that I see as not going obsolete for lifetimes foreseeable.. between the human being and the computer network.. the domain name is the central mode of communication that will be the least to go as obsolete.. we must preserve the "prefix.suffix" for typing in, period. Nothing should jip this or threaten this.. keystrokes --> computers (and together with voice)..
-An automatic Dot Mobi default on the mobile browser would be unfair to the other domain extensions (what's next a .tel default? or .com.cn default phone? aka.. several intranets..)
-An automatic Dot Mobi default on the mobile browser would be unfair to the people.. defiling principles of a higher good for humanity..
Can China, and others yet, join us as ONE?
I am for the higher good of both the immediate and long term perspective advocacy at the same time..
That means "NO" to the automatic Dot Mobi default by the mobile browser by MTLD Dot Mobi business consortium power..
I am WorldRadio.mobi, I am heavily invested in Dot Mobi; but, I believe in Internet Human Rights principles.. I am under Judgement by higher powers.. and so is humanity..
... and I know alot of influential people read the forums that are not posting; so, I will raise these issues so we can all go faster in thought.. and to raise grassroots awareness of a potentially impending intention being spun by the powerful that is actually against human progress..
-----
Friends, in short,
EVERYTHING for the love of God
Interfaith ministry following online and in real life at http://lovegodlovelife.com
Kind Regards,
Yelo











