The full data is here:
https://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=78326505&caseType=SERIAL_NO&searchType=statusSearch
The first thing you might notice is that this is a 1(b) application, and not a 1(a) application. A 1(b) is an intent-to-use application, and not an application based on use of the mark in commerce. I've written on namepros about that difference before, and this forum has a search feature.
So, that's an initial indication that this application, filed in 2003 and abandoned after failure to reply to an office action, might not correspond to a mark they were using. It doesn't answer the question, but it's a clue.
Now, let's have a look at the applicant.
The applicant is a Flashlanta Inc. of Georgia, and their email address is at flashlanta.com. Well, golly, the fact that flahslanta.com doesn't exist anymore might be a pretty big clue. Let's dig deeper... maybe conduct a Google search to find out what happened to Flashlanta. Did they and their assets get purchased, maybe? Maybe even do a Google search for "Flahslanta Devdes" to see if that comes up with any trace of use of that mark by this entity.
Or... have a look at the Georgia secretary of state corporation database to see what may have become of Flashlanta Inc.:
And, hey, waddya know, I'll bet that
[email protected] was April Williams, the CFO of the company. And when someone has a name like Ivan Mbakop, they are pretty easy to track down and figure out whether they might have a continuing interest in an intent to use application which was filed in 2003, received an office action in 2004 and was deemed abandoned for failure to reply to the office action some six months later (the actual notice lags the abandonment date).
But, no, just because a trademark registration application was abandoned does not, as an isolated fact, tell you anything conclusive. It
IS, however, a starting point to find out.