Brettina
RacingTips.tv COULD be built to be a place for live racing tips, especially if presented by a knowledgable and likeable person.
Vapour.tv could be a hip brandable.
BUT
In reality neither name is really suited to the .tv extension - can you really see massive amounts being spent on an expensively filmed, and no doubt hourly, daily, racing tips service when words are all that are needed - or large amounts being spent on a brandable TV name when you acquire another similarly cool brandable for a few dollars unregistered?
And this is without the fact that RacingTips and Vapour both break two unsaid rules of a good name - one is a two-worder while the other has an English English and a US English spelling.
Sorry, but I feel you may do better dropping these two.
My take is simple....
.tv domains as is are not worth much.
Have to be developed.
Even then, be ready to spend money, lots of money, to promote a .tv.
People do not search for a site this is .tv.
Rarely type in any tld except .com.
Good luck selling them.
I would agree with your simple take that It is indeed hard for the majority of people to find profit in .tv names.
In many ways, that's why so many others are so keen on them.
There are a great many here who have enjoyed several five-figure sales for .tv names. Indeed, if you look through the other posts in the TV section you will see a significant number of high figure sales in just the past few weeks and months. This info is readily available here or via DNJournal, TheDomains, etc
With regard to your assumption that people don't search for a site that is .tv - I find that a little dated. Those kind of conversations were being had seven years ago, but today the .tv name is firmly entrenched as the norm - especially for anything televisual.
Certainly, in areas where a film content is a major part of the site the use of a .tv is more preferable to any other extension, including .com
Also, as the owner of several .tv websites, I can confirm that most of them do incredibly well on google search and are not discriminated against for not being a .com!
I do agree that fewer will actually direct type in a .tv name - but equally the number of people typing in a .com name is dropping just the same. That's why we are seeing so many typo's being dropped all over the show in every extension.
I don't mind people slagging off .tv - indeed, I've done it many times myself (mostly over the stupidity of the verisign running the extension) - but I do object to sweeping, misleading and ignorant statements about .tv that have no basis in fact, reality and reseach.