- Impact
- 32,415
Are you regging names to develop? Or are you regging names betting that .tv will be more in demand with the increase in Internet -TV convergence?


RogueWriter said:Development, mostly, though I'd really like to sell a couple off before Xmas. You know, I remember in January 06 saying I was going to stop regginf new domains and develop all that i had. Errrr, okay, THIS January I will stop regging new domains and develop what I have. Really. Promise.
RogueWriter said:Development, mostly, though I'd really like to sell a couple off before Xmas. You know, I remember in January 06 saying I was going to stop regginf new domains and develop all that i had. Errrr, okay, THIS January I will stop regging new domains and develop what I have. Really. Promise.
equity78 said:Development in the lead in the poll although very few developed .tvs here
westblock said:Diversification & Development - Tupac.tv, Launched.tv, Unload.tv Sourcing.tv with a couple more in the works
Pretty funny that Development leaads in voting, and everyone talks development, but there are very few developed sites from within our community.
True, BUT if you don't start somewhere more often than not - nothing gets started.SKG said:EQ, development takes time. A quick job website is not development, imo.
Most here are Domainers - not programers and developers. Programers and developers tend to find a name and develop it; Domainers collect names and hope to develop...SKG said:I trust that many members here have good intentions for their respective names but the learning curve in creating a video web 2.0 enviroment is neither cheap nor easy to understand and the tools available are limited unless custom designed.
Original content is the number one thing that will make or break a site. There may be a small window that will allow developers to aggregate content from existing sources; YT, BC, etc... into niche verticals. Keeping the consumer interested enough to keep coming back. BUT, if it content available at numerous sites around what makes the site different? Also, if you're not able to manipulate the content to include advertising how are you making money?SKG said:Feeding copyright content is another problem developers are facing and utilizing approved content from places like brightcove has its hiccups also since you are helping advertise someone else's medium.
Just don't miss the trail leading up that mountain, and by all means SELL NAMES THAT DON'T FIT YOUR BUSINESS PLAN. Not all names are going to sell for thousands and thousands of dollars. Keep your focus on the profit center - a $30 reg that sells for $300 is a very healthy profit...SKG said:Rest assured the mountain will be climbed and in the meanwhile there is nothing wrong with selling some names along the way to help fund the end goal.
I did not suggest that at all. I found it funny that the option of development in the poll leads the way, and there are not many here that do develop.SKG said:Westblock, are you suggesting that people should not talk Development and just showcase their completed projects. If so then that defeats the purpose of having a forum, imo. The subforum would become an advertising medium instead of a learning experience. There are new and old members here coming and going all the time. To incourage participation for new members and speculators discussion is necessary and must be conducted in a professional manner. Talk is ok in my book.![]()
westblock said:Original content is the number one thing that will make or break a site. Also, if you're not able to manipulate the content to include advertising how are you making money?
There needs to be a complete business plan that can detail a revenue generating avenue. You will not pay your bills and profit from your time by adding adsense to a video site. There are numerous inherent problems with that; 1. adsense is text based - the ads served up are not relavant to the video content, 2. people are watching the video, not looking at the ads to click on. Traffic will allow for a site owner to sell ad space - Advertisers want targeted specific traffic and if you can provide that demographic they will pay for it. Huge shift in ad dollars going online from other marketing budgets... Adding an Ecom element and targeted affiliate marketing also have the potential of creating a large profit center.
Equity has pushed ideas and developement posts here from day one, but those informative posts and tools are often glossed over. There are not alot of "Development" ideas expounded upon.
The forum IS a showcase - look at everyones sig line...
I tend to avoid posting most of the time these days because too many posts do not add value and are not conducted in a professional manner. You want to talk programs, development, making money, affliate, ecom, technology, etc. as it relates to dot TV - I'm all for it and am ready and willing to contribute. That's why I still check in to see what is out there and how we can all be profitable and successful. The other dogma does not add value to new and existing members.
equity78 said:First off Personal attacks will not be tolerated and secondly James for you to talk about negativity is quite ironic IMO you look at the negative on a lot of things.
equity78 said:No I said that James because I think you said before you look at the negative or need something to worry about. I don't think Westblock was calling all the posts unprofessional but he needs to post and clarify what he meant I agree with that

