- Impact
- 2,262
So, just saw this on twitter. Feel free to drop your opinions.


I'm sorry it's just all waffle. The guy that invented the internet already invented a protocol for BYOD, it's called solid pods. Nothing to do with blockchains.Don't understand your logic.
There is nothing you have to explain:
It's a buzz word for an important niche.
Making your data decentralized and not part of the ownership of a tech platform.
Something, you (most likely) won't be able to achieve with web3 as it is today.
All thanks to Proof of Stake (it must be: fast in transfer, green in production, cheap etc).
Sry, that way you sacrifice real decentralization.
Pros know that btc was made with the intention, to have deal with small blocks, that must be progressed via blockchain technology.
Even new cryptos like Monero couldn't achieve that;
hence btc will most likely stay the all time classic ; )
na man,I'm sorry it's just all waffle. The guy that invented the internet already invented a protocol for BYOD, it's called solid pods. Nothing to do with blockchains.
I am? he's been working on it for years. Nobody even seems to want privacy when it's dangled Infront of them, let alone having to manage their own data or putting it on a blockchain.na man,
you know you are not right about this.
I would be focusing on Web5 development and domains in the finance area. Cash, money, credit, billing etc.Reckon the people that bought them are ready to buy web5 ones now?
Yeah, there is a big difference between companies in the "Web 3" field and those using "Web 3" in their domains.Web3... Only 30 sales on namebio. Not many recent ones either. So we're basically just pretending it's a trend at this point.
Show attachment 217743
I would replace the word important with "non-existent".It's a buzz word for an important niche.
VR,I would replace the word important with "non-existent".
It is an idea at this point. It if pans out, who knows.
If people want to buy domains in the field, be my guest, but it would be a good thing to look at other "trend" threads and how much money was wasted in them be if 3D, drones, weed, AI, crypto, web3, etc.
Brad
Every trend field generally has a limited amount of domains that are worthwhile. Many of those ones have been registered for a long time though when the trend actually starts to become popular.VR,
.mobi,
PWAs,
Libra,
Bitcoin,
.app,
Litecoin,
Meta,
.Xyz,
Stadia,
AR
I am still waiting for Jack Dorsey to build a company that actually turns a profit.If Jack Dorsey or Elon Musk say to jump from a cliff, will you follow his advice?
Obviously a large percent of all domains sales are not reported, likely a solid majority.So you think every sold domains is being reported on namebio. If ur stats is base on namebio data alone.. Then i understand your point. I have sold lots of names and for once i didnt submit on namebio likewise some domainers too. You are entitled to your opinion mate
"Web3" has 14,022 listed on Dan.com, and (30) total reported sales.I agree with what has already been said by @bmugford and others. The number of web5 domains listed on DAN has already risen to 3,532 in a short period of time. This should be more than enough for mankind. Most of these domains will remain for sale forever and eventually expire. Be very careful folks, especially newbies in our wonderful profession.
Show attachment 217746
I sold web3games.kingers in 5 figures and not reported.... Web5 is a great niche ! Like every niche only a good keyword sells..Web3... Only 30 sales on namebio. Not many recent ones either. So we're basically just pretending it's a trend at this point.
Show attachment 217743
Agreed. He's not exactly a visionaryI am still waiting for Jack Dorsey to build a company that actually turns a profit.
Sure, he has done well for himself but both Twitter and Square (Block) have an all time negative net income.
That means both of his major companies have lost more money than they have made, yet he is still a billionaire.
He is good at making money for himself, not others. Facts.
Brad
Why does that has to be so for web5 domains, but not for metaverse domains??Yeah, there is a big difference between companies in the "Web 3" field and those using "Web 3" in their domains.
It if becomes popular, it then becomes redundant to use as a term.
Brad
The vast majority of domain trends end the same way -As for sold web3 domains: Yeah, there is no need to use web3, as there is already metaverse as bigger buzz word.
Web5 however, is a keyword for its own niche.
That's the difference.


