Domain Empire

US gov returns seized RojaDirecta domain names

Spaceship Spaceship
Watch
Oops! Copyright Cops Return Seized RojaDirecta Domain Names – 19 Months Later

One of Spain’s most popular websites, whose American domains were seized in January 2011 as part of a crackdown on internet piracy, is getting its domains returned 19 months later, as the U.S. government voluntarily dropped its claim Wednesday.

The Rojadirecta .com and .org domains were seized more than a year and a half ago, along with eight others connected to broadcasting pirated streams of professional sports, as part of the government’s “Operation in Our Sites.”

The federal court order mandating return of the domain names marks the second court “victory” for seized sites. Earlier this year, the government reluctantly, and without apology, returned a music blog’s domain name after seizing it at the behest of the RIAA, holding onto it for more than a year, and then failing to even file charges against the site.

The government, which seized the domain names for simply including links to copyrighted content, dropped the Rojadirecta claim, seemingly due to a recent ruling by Judge Richard Posner. Posner, one of the nation’s most respected judges, knocked down charges that a video bookmarking site was infringing copyright law, just because its users linked to copyrighted videos.

In a letter accompanying the motion to dismiss, the government told the New York federal court that it had changed its mind:

The Government respectfully submits this letter to advise the Court that as a result of certain recent judicial authority involving issues germane to the above-captioned action, and in light of the particular circumstances of this litigation, the Government now seeks to dismiss its amended forfeiture complaint. The decision to seek dismissal ofthis case will best promote judicial economy and serve the interests of justice.

Puerto 80, which claims the Rojadirecta site sports 865,000 registered users, has long maintained it has committed no copyright infringement. The site is a discussion board where members can talks sports, politics and other topics, and it additionally links to sports streams — some of which are pirated.

“The government has not shown and cannot show that the site ever was used to commit a criminal act, much less that it will be in the future. By hosting discussion forums and linking to existing material on the internet, Puerto 80 is not committing copyright infringement, let alone criminal copyright infringement,” (.pdf) according to the site’s legal filing last year.

The site says it also tried to negotiate with the government to get the site back, but were told they would only get it back if the site prohibited its users from linking to any U.S. content anywhere on its sites.

The lawsuit added that “the government effectively shut down an entire website, suppressing all of the speech hosted on it, based on an assertion that there was probable cause to believe that some of the material linked to the website (though not found on the website itself) might be infringing.”

The U.S. government is taking .com, .org. and .net domains with court approval, under the same civil seizure law the government invokes to seize brick-and-mortar drug houses, bank accounts and other property tied to illegal activity.

http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/08/domain-names-returned/
 
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
*

In this case, the government was definitely overreaching, so the reversal was a good move.

I would think that the forum owners would be protected under safe harbor laws, which stipulate that site owners cannot be held responsible for what their members do, unless they know about it and don't do anything about it (difficult to prove).

Also, when one links to a site, one does not always know if the content is original or scraped.

It's time to get real and go after the REAL offenders: the scumbag scam sites that load malware and phish for passwords.

*
 
0
•••
The judge should order the US Government to reimburse the domain/website owners for lost compensation, attorney's fees, and damages resulting from emotional distress and mental anguish.
 
0
•••
to make it fair, US government would need to pay to the owners the market value of the sites 19 month ago besides returning the domain names. I don't think few news articles would give back the site popularity, now probably taken by other sites.
 
0
•••
Yes, it seems extremely unfair. To take away a domain name can literally put someone out of business these days. Even with the domain back, they may never be able to recover and get back to the same state they were.

From the article, the site was a discussion forum - and after so many months later, all of the members have likely moved on and may never even be back
 
0
•••
4
•••
0
•••
The more I read about it the more I'm appalled at just what happened here.

If there aren't any serious repercussions for wrongful seizures, it means it will happen again - and it could happen to anyone.
 
0
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back