legal URS: A Failed Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy That ICANN Insiders Wish To Impose...

[GeorgeK]

Just blogged:

URS: A Failed Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy That ICANN Insiders Wish To Impose On More Registrants (Part 1)

In this multi-part series, I look at the Uniform Rapid Suspension (URS) policy, a domain name dispute resolution policy that the RPM PDP working group of ICANN is currently reviewing. In a fair and unbiased review of the facts, the URS would be abandoned as a failed idea. However, in the ICANN world, that fair and unbiased review doesn’t exist, and instead ICANN insiders wish to impose that flawed policy upon even more domain name registrants.

See more at: https://freespeech.com/2019/12/03/u...rs-wish-to-impose-on-more-registrants-part-1/

 

[TERADOMAIN]

Thanks for sharing.

 

[Internet.Domains]

Is there anything that ICANN has done good? Just ONE thing? Give us one?............I'm waiting..........That's what I thought.

 

[DomainFQ.com]

Thanks for sharing.

 

[oskaaay]

Is there anything that ICANN has done good? Just ONE thing? Give us one?............I'm waiting..........That's what I thought.

hmmmm... may be trying to sell .org extension IMO...LOL!

 

[Domain_savvy]

URS is so flawed. I thought ICANN was there to make justice, atleast in majority cases. But this will worsen it more if URS goes through.

 

[GeorgeK]

I just posted part 2 in this multi-part series:

https://freespeech.com/2019/12/10/u...rs-wish-to-impose-on-more-registrants-part-2/

 

[GeorgeK]

One of the working group members tried to broach the topic today of troubling URS decisions, but got shut down by one of the co-chairs, using a double standard. I called this out immediately in a blog post:

https://freespeech.com/2019/12/11/i...uses-double-standard-to-shut-down-urs-debate/

 

[.X.]

One word: Corruption

always has been and always will be, money is power.