UDRP Panel Says Responding To An Offer To Sell, Doesn’t Indicate Bad Faith If...

[Archangel]

“‘The Respondent alleges that, because the Complainant initiated the offer for the sale of the disputed domain name, the Respondent’s counteroffer does not exhibit bad faith registration and use.”

“Previous panels have determined that, when a complainant initiates an offer for the sale of a disputed domain name, a respondent’s willingness to engage in negotiations for the sale of the domain name does not equate to bad faith. ”

Interesting read. For more: http://www.thedomains.com/2012/04/1...h-if-the-offer-is-started-by-the-complainant/

 

[JFS]

nice news

 

[alien51]

Nice ruling.

But then again, the UDRP Wall of Shame guys should still explain why it is possible for the same Complainant to re-file the same identical case months later, and get a totally reverse ruling from a different Judge, with total, and absolute, and complete disregard of the ruling made by the previous Judge.

It's been weeks, and i still can't believe it. It baffles my mind to the end.