The USA Political Thread

[lennco]

Here you can spout your USA political views.

Rules:
1. Keep it clean
2. No fighting
3. Respect the views of others.
4. US Political views, No Religious views
5. Have fun

:wave:

 

[SirDrago]

what's the point?

The point jb is the fact your pitiful party already lost the 2020 election... your just in denial like 2016.

 

[JB Lions]

The point jb is the fact your pitiful party already lost the 2020 election... your just in denial like 2016.

Show attachment 132700

I'm not the one in denial right now. It's interesting to watch. You guys are literally denying reality. It's like you guys are in the first stages of grief. Just go reread your last few posts.

 

[DNWon]

Who is William Taylor? Impeachment Star Witness Has Long Relationship with Burisma-Backed Think Tank

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...gtime-relationship-burisma-backed-think-tank/

Well, well, well, what do we have here? Why am I not surprised!

 

[mr-x]

Why are you talking nonsense, what's the point? We've gone over this endless times, have you not been reading? They have video, they have texts, they have statements, they have everything they need. The posts lately (or should I say even more than usual) from Trump supporters are truly ridiculous and not based on any type of reality.

----------------------

"we should have seen this coming" sniffle... "yesterday's testimony was DEVASTATING".. more sniffles.

LOL...

 

[JB Lions]

"we should have seen this coming" sniffle... "yesterday's testimony was DEVASTATING".. more sniffles.

LOL...

What does that even mean? It was just more evidence of what we already know. Nothing good for Trump.

Who is William Taylor? Impeachment Star Witness Has Long Relationship with Burisma-Backed Think Tank

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...gtime-relationship-burisma-backed-think-tank/

Well, well, well, what do we have here? Why am I not surprised!

There is no way you read that article. Just for kicks, I want you to tell me in your own words, "what do we have here" Break down that long article for us.

 

[DNWon]

Whistleblower acknowledged additional element of potential anti-Trump bias, sources say

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/wh...ayer-of-potential-anti-trump-bias-sources-say

 

[JB Lions]

You guys are very desperate, posting stuff that has nothing to do with the fact that there was a quid pro quo, a favor for a favor, which is illegal. They already admitted it, didn't even need that, just bonus.

 

[lennco]

 

[lennco]

 

[lennco]

 

[SirDrago]

What does that even mean?

It means record breaking economy
It means record breaking unemployment
It means record breaking fund raising
It means record breaking military funding
It means record breaking opioids funding
It means record breaking va choice
It means record breaking NATO spending
It means record breaking Median household income

Should I continue?
It might take up your c*nt news network view time.

 

[JB Lions]

It means record breaking economy
It means record breaking unemployment
It means record breaking fund raising
It means record breaking military funding
It means record breaking opioids funding
It means record breaking va choice
It means record breaking NATO spending
It means record breaking Median household income

Should I continue?
It might take up your c*nt news network view time.

Which has nothing to do with breaking the law, what the impeachment is about.

 

[SirDrago]

Which has nothing to do with breaking the law, what the impeachment is about.

Americans only care about safety, economy and health.

Your party is completely agaisnt that. Hence there are now 3rd party candidates testing the waters to rescue the 12 losers.

 

[JB Lions]

Americans only care about safety, economy and health.

Your party is completely agaisnt that. Hence there are now 3rd party candidates testing the waters to rescue the 12 losers.

That's false. Most Americans support impeachment. 3d party candidates is something the Republicans would like, you guys are throwing a lot out there, desperation. Top Dems all win against Trump. So to be clear, you're ok with breaking the law, violating the Constitution? I know @mr-x is. I think last week or the week before he said he doesn't care if the President is impeached.

Support for impeachment inquiry reaches new high: poll
https://thehill.com/homenews/admini...for-impeachment-inquiry-reaches-new-high-poll

 

[GILSAN]

Justin Trudeau is a ‘culturally cringing chameleon’

 

[SirDrago]

That's false. Most Americans support impeachment. 3d party candidates is something the Republicans would like, you guys are throwing a lot out there, desperation. Top Dems all win against Trump. So to be clear, you're ok with breaking the law, violating the Constitution? I know @mr-x is. I think last week or the week before he said he doesn't care if the President is impeached.

Support for impeachment inquiry reaches new high: poll
https://thehill.com/homenews/admini...for-impeachment-inquiry-reaches-new-high-poll

Jb, let me remind you of a earlier post I made in this very thread.
"You CANNOT become a government top offical WITHOUT breaking any laws.
I said it, I stand by it and you cannot deny it isn't true.
With that said the bottom line is the dummycrats don't have the votes. The Russian collusion delusion fell flat and so will this phony impeachment inquiry.

 

[.X.]

That's false. Most Americans support impeachment. 3d party candidates is something the Republicans would like, you guys are throwing a lot out there, desperation. Top Dems all win against Trump. So to be clear, you're ok with breaking the law, violating the Constitution? I know @mr-x is. I think last week or the week before he said he doesn't care if the President is impeached.

Support for impeachment inquiry reaches new high: poll
https://thehill.com/homenews/admini...for-impeachment-inquiry-reaches-new-high-poll

Hillary Clinton had Trump beat by a wide margin according to media and the DNC in 2016. Which obviously wan not true, Trump had her concede on election night, who woulda thought huh

Here I am another week later waiting for discovery evidence of a crime the President has committed

 

[lennco]

 

[GILSAN]

Here I am another week later waiting for discovery evidence of a crime the President has committed

If you're waiting for what I assume is JB's answer, then it's gonna be a fucking long wait...

 

[Sam1234]

It's pretty clear that the media and all the liberal cronies are on a mission to totally drown everybody on the Internet with the idea that Trump committed a crime, because they know if they can convince stupid people now that the media will just ignore it later when the whole thing is proven false. This isn't the first time they bullied one of Trump's people into saying "orange man bad". Of course liberals are going to go on and on about whatever they heard on CNN, but if history is any indication there will be no impeachment and nothing will come of these allegations, and the truth about Liberals partnering with rogue intelligence agencies to remove a sitting President will be swept under the rug. You can't get the real story from the CIA, and you definitely won't get it from the media, so you either believe the propaganda you are being beaten over the head with or you don't. Conservatives said nothing would come of the Russia investigation and literally nothing came of it, except the simple truth that Liberals wasted billions of public dollars and enormous amounts of public time in pursuing it. They know Trump will never be charged or unseated for any of this imaginary bullshit, but they keep up the narrative because they know they have 4 more years coming, and the instant they admit the whole thing was a farce you're looking at the end of the Democratic party.

The plan is to push this for 4 more years because they can't beat Trump, then elect a liberal somehow, and pretend there was some big conspiracy to block the proof of their allegations (proof which will of course never be produced).