The USA Political Thread

[lennco]

Here you can spout your USA political views.

Rules:
1. Keep it clean
2. No fighting
3. Respect the views of others.
4. US Political views, No Religious views
5. Have fun

:wave:

 

[mr-x]

"Lawmaker faces criticism for a Christian prayer she delivered in the Pennsylvania House of Representatives on Monday, the same day the body swore in its first female Muslim member. Democratic Rep. Movita Johnson-Harrell of Philadelphia, who was sworn in on a Quran after Borowicz's prayer, said Tuesday that she thought "for the most part, the entire invocation was offensive."

Little crazy, over the top? Shouldn't prayer be kept at home, church, etc. on your own time. Think religion should be kept out of stuff like this.

The Muslim prayer spoken before the meeting was taken from the Quran and blasphemes Jesus Christ.

 

[mr-x]

Democrats before 2016: Deficits don't matter.

Democrats after 2016: The deficit and national debt are terrible!! They could destroy the country.

Also democrats after 2016: Trump and DeVos are EVIL!! EVIL!! They want' to cut from from the Special Olympics!! Enforce due process and free speech on college campuses!!

FYI: Special Olympics budget is still higher than it was last year. DNC friendly media always publish this click bate b/s and spin it like R's are heartless.

Pres. Trump caved instead of explaining the truth.

 

[GILSAN]

 

[JB Lions]

You guys have unleashed the Schiff.

Fox’s Judge Napolitano: Schiff ‘Is Correct’ That Mueller Report Will Show Evidence of Trump-Russia Collusion
https://www.thedailybeast.com/foxs-...-will-show-evidence-of-trump-russia-collusion

Can you guys tell me where Schiff is wrong in this video:

 

[SirDrago]

Counting to 5 a difficult task for some. What kind of fool thinks mentioning Hillary somehow absolves Trump of his crimes.

Fox News’ Judge Napolitano: We Now Know Trump ‘Committed a Felony’
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/fox-news’-judge-napolitano-we-now-know-trump-‘committed-a-felony’/ar-BBQS7sv?li=BBnb7Kz

You posted the same garbage Dec, 2018
Please wake up!

 

[JB Lions]

You posted the same garbage Dec, 2018
Please wake up!

It is, wonder why it was posted again today.

What about the video?

 

[JB Lions]

Actually, I posted wrong link:

Justin Baragona
03.28.19 2:27 PM ET

Fox’s Judge Napolitano: Schiff ‘Is Correct’ That Mueller Report Will Show Evidence of Trump-Russia Collusion

https://www.thedailybeast.com/foxs-...-will-show-evidence-of-trump-russia-collusion

Tackle that one or Schiff video I posted earlier.

 

[JB Lions]

You posted the same garbage Dec, 2018
Please wake up!

lol, actually, YOU posted wrong link. I got it right the first time. The link you posted, is not the one I posted.

This is what I posted:

You guys have unleashed the Schiff.

Fox’s Judge Napolitano: Schiff ‘Is Correct’ That Mueller Report Will Show Evidence of Trump-Russia Collusion
https://www.thedailybeast.com/foxs-...-will-show-evidence-of-trump-russia-collusion

Can you guys tell me where Schiff is wrong in this video:

 

[NameLlama]

 

[NamesMax]

Can you guys tell me where Schiff is wrong in this video:

Pretty much the whole thing. "He goes on saying you might thinks it's okay..." ending each line with an accusation. These go on assuming that those statements are truth, when indeed that they are not. It is a great debating technique but offers not one statement of fact.

This is essentially a group of loaded questions which are defined as, "A loaded question is a question that contains a controversial or unjustified assumption (e.g., a presumption of guilt)

It is kind of like the old red herring question, Have you stopped beating your wife? Either answer is negative. If you answer no, it means you are still beating her. If you say yes it means you have indeed beat her in the past.

 

[JB Lions]

Pretty much the whole thing. "He goes on saying you might thinks it's okay..." ending each line with an accusation. These go on assuming that those statements are truth, when indeed that they are not. It is a great debating technique but offers not one statement of fact.

This is essentially a group of loaded questions which are defined as, "A loaded question is a question that contains a controversial or unjustified assumption (e.g., a presumption of guilt)

It is kind of like the old red herring question, Have you stopped beating your wife? Either answer is negative. If you answer no, it means you are still beating her. If you say yes it means you have indeed beat her in the past.

That was a copout response. Actually, quote where he gets something wrong or that you disagree with, then let's take a look at it.

 

[NamesMax]

@JB Lions I did when I said "pretty much the whole thing" Let's turn that around. How about you quote where he get's something right. (BTW I did view the entire video before responding.) He did not state 1 thing as being factual, just statements of "You might think it's okay...."

 

[SirDrago]

How about you listen to pencil neck Adam schit
Actually committing Russian collusion...

Audio: Russian Comedians Prank Called Rep. Adam Schiff, Promised Him Naked Photos Of Trump

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...omise_him_naked_photos_of_trump_from_fsb.html

 

[JB Lions]

@JB Lions I did when I said "pretty much the whole thing" Let's turn that around. How about you quote where he get's something right. (BTW I did view the entire video before responding.) He did not state 1 thing as being factual, just statements of "You might think it's okay...."

I know, again, that's a copout. When people don't actually use details, it's usually because they can't.

First minute and half in video. Russians offered dirt - https://www.thedailybeast.com/nyt-russians-offered-trumps-son-dirt-on-hillary

The Manafort stuff after that - http://time.com/5490169/paul-manafort-victor-boyarkin-debts/

Now you.

 

[SirDrago]

The Daily Mail reports that Schiff sent his staff to try and collect "classified materials for the FBI" after the prank callers told him Putin has naked blackmail pictures of President Trump.

Schiff can be heard discussing the Russia investigation with a man who claimed to be Andriy Parubiy, the chairman of the Ukrainian Parliament.


And that clown is in charge of the intelligence committee. LMFAO!

 

[SirDrago]

I know, again, that's a copout. When people don't actually use details, it's usually because they can't.

First minute and half in video. Russians offered dirt - https://www.thedailybeast.com/nyt-russians-offered-trumps-son-dirt-on-hillary

The Manafort stuff after that - http://time.com/5490169/paul-manafort-victor-boyarkin-debts/

Now you.

Excuse me sir,
I presented to you Adam himself on a recording talking to Russians about a classified investigation and you post "hear say" links in rebuttal?
Honestly I expected more from you.

 

[JB Lions]

Excuse me sir,
I presented to you Adam himself on a recording talking to Russians about a classified investigation and you post "hear say" links in rebuttal?
Honestly I expected more from you.

Another dodge. You posted stuff after I did, didn't respond but then want me to respond.

It's because Schiff is on point. He's not sucking off Putin or Trump like the rest of the Republican party.

Or didn't touch:

Fox’s Judge Napolitano: Schiff ‘Is Correct’ That Mueller Report Will Show Evidence of Trump-Russia Collusion

I shared PROOF!
That's Adam on that recording.

I linked to proof, again, you dodged it.

 

[SirDrago]

Another dodge.

I shared PROOF!
That's Adam on that recording.

 

[NamesMax]

I know, again, that's a copout. When people don't actually use details, it's usually because they can't.

First minute and half in video. Russians offered dirt - https://www.thedailybeast.com/nyt-russians-offered-trumps-son-dirt-on-hillary

The Manafort stuff after that - http://time.com/5490169/paul-manafort-victor-boyarkin-debts/

Again he makes NO STATEMENT OF FACT, just "you might think its okay that the Russians offered dirt...but I don't" So I guess you are right when you say, When people don't actually use facts, it's wusually because they can't.

That holds as much weight as if I said, "You might think it's okay if @JB Lions cheats on his taxes, but I don't" I have not accused you of cheating on your taxes. It does not mean that you cheated on your taxes, but by your reasoning, you must have cheated on your taxes because I made that statement.

None of the non-allegations Schiff makes have a basis in fact or reality. If they did then Mueller, after 2 years and 10's of millions of dollars later would not have issued a "didn't happen"

 

[SirDrago]

Another dodge. You posted stuff after I did, didn't respond but then want me to respond.

It's because Schiff is on point. He's not sucking off Putin or Trump like the rest of the Republican party.

Or didn't touch:

Fox’s Judge Napolitano: Schiff ‘Is Correct’ That Mueller Report Will Show Evidence of Trump-Russia Collusion



I linked to proof, again, you dodged it.

I responded to your original post about the judge perhaps you missed it?
I mentioned that you posted a similar link Dec 2018 and the results are the same NO COLLUSION