Dynadot โ€” .com Transfer
SpaceshipSpaceship
Watch

Who is to Blame for the Troubled US Economy?

  • This poll is still running and the standings may change.
  • Both Parties

    305 
    votes
    45.6%
  • Neither Party

    58 
    votes
    8.7%
  • Democrats

    150 
    votes
    22.4%
  • Republicans

    156 
    votes
    23.3%
  • This poll is still running and the standings may change.

Here you can spout your USA political views.

Rules:
1. Keep it clean
2. No fighting
3. Respect the views of others.
4. US Political views, No Religious views
5. Have fun :)

:wave:
 
17
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
AfternicAfternic
mr-x said to Gilsan,

h420597EE
 
1
•••
Last edited:
1
•••
0
•••
Last edited:
1
•••
Lennco shit posting... JB cleaning up after him.

VlUuF89.jpg
 
0
•••
0
•••
LAMBORGHINI[1].jpg
pro-life-march.jpg
 
0
•••
And yet you still haven't answered my question.

Let me explain it like your five:

Your level for "proof' of guilt is probably different than mine. He said, they said accusations, don't cut it. If President Trump was charged with a crime and convicted like President Clinton, he should be impeached.

Impeachment doesn't mean being removed from office. President Clinton was convicted of perjury, he stayed in office. If President Trump committed a crime worse than Clinton, I would probably want him removed from office.

** I want the complete truth. Not a washed / filtered version.

Are we supposed to believe Bill Clinton didn't obstruct justice when he meet the Attorney General on an airport runway, while his wife was being investigated for federal crimes?

We don't have proof but people were smart enough to see what was going on. She didn't become President.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Impeachment doesn't mean being removed from office.
No shit.
Article 25 would need to be enacted.

Just say Yes you would still support him. Because that is what it sounds like.

I would bet if he is thrown out of office, and tons of evidence shows more then enough on how bad he really was, 30 years after the fact you would probably be saying the dems and liberals railroaded him and they found anything they could to kick him out.
 
0
•••
Should I be surprised you need to qualify the word TRUTH?

The truth is like gender, completely fluid and whatever someone says it is, (unless that person is conservative, of course). Every enlightened person knows this. Only patriarchal, repressed-rapist, conservative racist neanderthals have trouble with this concept.
 
0
•••
Let me explain it like your five:

Your level for "proof' of guilt is probably different than mine. He said, they said accusations, don't cut it. If President Trump was charged with a crime and convicted like President Clinton, he should be impeached.

Impeachment doesn't mean being removed from office. President Clinton was convicted of perjury, he stayed in office. If President Trump committed a crime worse than Clinton, I would probably want him removed from office.

** I want the complete truth. Not a washed / filtered version.

Are we supposed to believe Bill Clinton didn't obstruct justice when he meet the Attorney General on an airport runway, while his wife was being investigated for federal crimes?

We don't have proof but people were smart enough to see what was going on. She didn't become President.
Well, its always fun going round and round with you but I got call it a day.
See ya later :xf.smile:

retro_photos_in_color_640_43.jpg
 
2
•••
If the glove donโ€™t fit, you must acquit.
Nancy is on the beach, you must impeach.
Cohen is a liar, he must be fired.
Trump is a chump, he must build the wall. That didnt rhyme. Lol

Buzzfeed story debunked just now, direct from Muellers office!!!!!

More fake news. Too bad CNN didnt do it.
 
Last edited:
2
•••
1
•••
3
•••
If the glove donโ€™t fit, you must acquit.
Nancy is on the beach, you must impeach.
Cohen is a liar, he must be fired.
Trump is a chump, he must build the wall. That didnt rhyme. Lol

Buzzfeed story debunked just now, direct from Muellers office!!!!!

More fake news. Too bad CNN didnt do it.
Well to be a bit more accurate, Peter Carr, a spokesman for Mueller's office, said in a statement
"BuzzFeed's description of specific statements to the Special Counsel's Office, and characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office, regarding Michael Cohen's Congressional testimony are not accurate,"...
Carr never said any of it was untrue, or a lie, or made up.

But if not being accurate equates to being a sham (see below), then that would logically mean the T-Man and his minions have been putting up a CRAP TON of falsehoods and fake news themselves for the last few years....

But, but, but that's just not possible, right?!?!?

------------------
debunk
verb
deยทbunk | \ (หŒ)dฤ“-หˆbษ™ล‹k \
debunked; debunking; debunks
Definition of debunk
transitive verb

: to expose the sham (see SHAM entry 1 sense 2) or falseness of
-----------------
sham
noun
\ หˆsham \
Definition of sham
(Entry 1 of 3)

1: a trick that deludes : HOAXfeared that the deal was a sham
2: cheap falseness : HYPOCRISYsaw through the hollowness, the sham, the silliness of the empty pageantโ€” Oscar Wilde
3: an ornamental covering for a pillow
4: an imitation or counterfeit purporting to be genuine
5: a person who shams
sham

adjective
Definition of sham (Entry 2 of 3)

1: not genuine : FALSE, FEIGNED
2: having such poor quality as to seem false
sham

verb
shammed; shamming
Definition of sham (Entry 3 of 3)

transitive verb

: to go through the external motions necessary to counterfeit
intransitive verb

: to act intentionally so as to give a false impression : FEIGN

NOTE: I'm not trying to suggest that there is any truth behind the original story. Anyone with half a brain will wait for all the evidence to see the light of day. Just like no one should automatically accept as fact anything the T-man and his minions say until the facts and evidence is provided for all to see. (And I'm not talking "alternative facts" here...)
 
Last edited:
3
•••
Because you are not answering my question. Your reply is Vague at best.

It is a simple Yes or No.
Will you still support Trump if the buzzfeed article it proven True?

Robert Mueller office officially disputes the buzzfeed article. HERE
Do you support Trump now?

That's a CNN link for you simpletons.
 
Last edited:
4
•••
Last edited:
0
•••
Just can't trust the "enemy of the people"
The Twitter Fight at No Wall Corral...

 
1
•••
I will be making a major announcement concerning the Humanitarian Crisis on our Southern Border, and the Shutdown, tomorrow afternoon at 3 P.M., live from the @WhiteHouse.
Donald J. Trumpโ€Verified account @realDonaldTrump 3h3 hours ago

What could that possibly be, any guesses?

Is he folding?
Did they reach an agreement?
More bs like the Prime Time show, just repeating stuff again.

a very very odd day and time to address the nation IMO

My local news station had a segment about the "Buzzfeed" article and said, Mueller, says the article is not accurate.

Never the less, these investigations are starting to heat up a bit, I figured well enough that the snitching would start once a jail or prison term became prevalent in these cases.
 
0
•••
a very very odd day and time to address the nation IMO

My local news station had a segment about the "Buzzfeed" article and said, Mueller, says the article is not accurate.

Never the less, these investigations are starting to heat up a bit, I figured well enough that the snitching would start once a jail or prison term became prevalent in these cases.

Yeah, Saturday, 3pm for some big announcement. This stuff doesn't usually happen on the weekends.

I'll wait till Feb 7 when we can hear it straight from the horse's mouth, Cohen testifying before Congress. Unless, he gets cold feet, this could break some ratings records.
 
0
•••
Appraise.net
Spaceship
Domain Recover
CatchDoms
DomainEasy โ€” Payment Flexibility
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the pageโ€™s height.
Back