The USA Political Thread

[lennco]

Here you can spout your USA political views.

Rules:
1. Keep it clean
2. No fighting
3. Respect the views of others.
4. US Political views, No Religious views
5. Have fun

:wave:

 

[GILSAN]

All I have to say is...

Show attachment 99347

So do I and Brett. And so does Obama. And so do hundreds of millions all over the world except... in Muslim countries. Any Liberal have a problem with that?

 

[GILSAN]

 

[mr-x]

@DNWon @GILSAN @offthehandle @SirDrago @Nem0

 

[DNWon]

Dilly Dilly Indeed! @mr-x

 

[offthehandle]

It’s not a “smear”, Bloomberg just published the story.
QDF

The politicians websites if you looked at them are tricks. They are fake and purposely done to trick the reader and political. Look at the links in the article. So, by Google displaying at top of the results then Google is condoning and by default promoting fake news sites.

Of all the searching I did today, NOT ONE Fox News article was displayed for any politicians name. Nor Breitbart- all left liberal websites entirely.

Google purportedly is supposed to suggest and display based on "User intent" right? (My own) was to find out more about this guy, I recall him years ago. NOT to find the second result as a distraction about him and read some article about how the resistance was putting up fake news sites against him and those others.
Complete B.S.

 

[JB Lions]

The politicians websites if you looked at them are tricks. They are fake and purposely done to trick the reader and political. Look at the links in the article. So, by Google displaying at top of the results then Google is condoning and by default promoting fake news sites.

Of all the searching I did today, NOT ONE Fox News article was displayed for any politicians name. Nor Breitbart- all left liberal websites entirely.

Google purportedly is supposed to suggest and display based on "User intent" right? (My own) was to find out more about this guy, I recall him years ago. NOT to find the second result as a distraction about him and read some article about how the resistance was putting up fake news sites against him and those others.
Complete B.S.

Complete B.S. was yet another one of your posts. Just for kicks, decided to check:

https://www.google.com/search?clien.......0...1c..64.psy-ab..0.0.0....0.ZhNlP4j_Fv8

I see Breitbart page 2, page 3, CNN doesn't come till page 5.

It looks like my Google is Conservative friendly, using your way of looking at things.

I guess Google is Pro-Trump, Conservative, Alt-Right, since they put Breitbart pages ahead of CNN.

Can you tell me why else they would put Breitbart pages ahead of CNN? I think it's the tax cuts Trump gave Google and all the rich people. Rich taking care of the rich. They've been skewering the results in favor of Trump. This is an outrage.

 

[offthehandle]

It used to be civil.

Unlike this mess caused by Schumer and Feinstein, et al. Feinstein is an unbelievable
85 just like RBG too.

"Justice Ginsburg was confirmed to the bench by a U.S. Senate vote of 96-3, two months after she was nominated by then-President Bill Clinton. The liberal justice said Wednesday that the “atmosphere” back then was “truly bipartisan.”

“The vote on my confirmation was 96-3, even though I had spent about 10 years of my life litigating cases under the auspices of the ACLU,” she said.

“No senator asked me any questions — not about that,” she said.

Justice Ginsburg also noted that the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia was confirmed 98-0 despite his conservative leanings."

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/sep/13/ruth-bader-ginsburg-blasts-brett-kavanaugh-hearing/

 

[SirDrago]

@DNWon @GILSAN @offthehandle @SirDrago @Nem0

Show attachment 99351

 

[offthehandle]

Negative and what (2) 2017 articles?????

 

[offthehandle]

I guess screenshots are the only thing you get. These Fake websites indirectly promoted slyly as "news" by Bloomberg. Bloomberg which isn't impartial could have elected not to include backlinks that rank these websites. The article still shows as 2nd in search up when typing "Rohrabacher"

Mike Bost.com

Dave Schweikert.com

 

[offthehandle]

Here's the proof. MikeBost(.)com is the fake website, and google is ranking it number 1! Second is the real website bostforcongress.com.

Nah... no way. Google could never be biased.

 

[DNWon]

 

[JB Lions]

Here's the proof. MikeBost(.)com is the fake website, and google is ranking it number 1! Second is the real website bostforcongress.com.

Nah... no way. Google could never be biased.

Show attachment 99358

Lost count of how many times you've played yourself in this thread. You typed in mikebost.com, what do you expect to show up? Now try mike bost, the site doesn't show up first 5 pages - https://www.google.com/search?clien...4s_PdAhXlYt8KHc70CKMQBQgqKAA&biw=1536&bih=701

I think you just don't know how search engines work, that they use an algorithm.

4th down is the real website for the Rep. Google is ranking fake news websites.

My goodness, this is sad.

You know I can type in one of my domains that is parked like caftans.com and it'll show up #1. Because I have the .com attached to it. But type in caftans, nowhere to be found. You really have no idea.

 

[offthehandle]

4th down is the real website for the Rep. Google is ranking fake news websites.

 

[offthehandle]

Lost count of how many times you've played yourself in this thread. You typed in mikebost.com, what do you expect to show up? Now try mike bost, the site doesn't show up first 5 pages

Duh. Oh, but I thought Facebook and Google didn't rank fake news?

I guess that's another lie.

Why should fake sites even rank at all? They should be deindexed. Not only that but there will be a certain number of people who believe in .Com (You yourself are a "Never a NewGTLD guy also right? ha.) and will type that in, as they are not into searching in the URL bar.

Or, perhaps this nonsense is covered under freedom of speech to register a political candidates domain name without their consent and post garbage about them? Censorship I don't want either. If it was MikeBostSucks.com I get it. or IHateMikeBost.com. The intention is to trick the search, trick the person searching- plain and simple misrepresentation. Clever, really it is. Cannot criticize it from being clever, but it is just like fake news.

I don't suppose you read the entire Bloomberg article, very interesting really.

 

[JB Lions]

IT DOESN'T RANK

https://www.google.com/search?q=mike+bost&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-1

Tell me what page it's on.

MSN
https://www.bing.com/search?q=mike+bost&pc=MOZI&form=MOZSBR

I see his official site on page 1 of both of them.

Again, one of my parked domains, just ads:

Caftans.com - #1 result, actually blank, not even ads
https://www.google.com/search?q=caftans.com&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-1

Caftans - nowhere
https://www.google.com/search?clien.......1..gws-wiz.......0i30j0i10i30.gRyiI23hfwM

If you search for (whatever).com, that's what you'll get, even parked pages

 

[GILSAN]

Protesters Try to Stop Ben Shapiro From Speaking at USC

 

[GILSAN]

Kathy Griffin @kathygriffin
D) FUCCKKKKK YOUUUUUU @SenatorCollins

Is this angry POS still around?

 

[offthehandle]

Politicians are dumb.

https://www.cnbc.com/2016/09/02/ted-cruz-and-his-weird-relationship-with-com.html

https://www.businessinsider.com/tedcruzcom-shows-why-candidates-should-secure-web-domains-2016-5

 

[GILSAN]

Donald Trump Jr. @DonaldJTrumpJr
Oct 5
Trump supporters - The fight isn’t over. You better believe that Democrats are going to do everything in their power to impeach Kavanuagh from the Supreme Court if they take control of Congress in November.
This is war. Time to fight. Vote on Nov 6 to protect the Supreme Court!

Charlie Kirk @charliekirk11
Oct 5 Imagine being a Democrat: You historically lost the 2016 election Every prediction about Trump failing has been hilariously wrong Two strong conservatives are now on the Supreme Court And your attempt to destroy Kavanaugh ended up uniting and energizing Republicans Must suck