The USA Political Thread

[lennco]

Here you can spout your USA political views.

Rules:
1. Keep it clean
2. No fighting
3. Respect the views of others.
4. US Political views, No Religious views
5. Have fun

:wave:

 

[kemjika11]

I see your not only a racist but a misogynist

Ad hominem again cuz you can't counter my point. Lmao

 

[JB Lions]

America is slipping down the fascism road pretty quickly now, cheered on by many eager sheep who think the smell of lamb chops is only coming from the sheep they don't like, not them. The beauty of the internet was that it offered away for anyone to be heard, a way around the gatekeepers. Now we have new gatekeepers, even more centralized and powerful than the former.

Blockchain and decentralized networks will offer new hope for people. The typical person doesn't see the need for it now. But the same tactics used to silence Alex Jones and Tommy Robinson will be used on the left at some point in the near future. The political tides shift, but the loss of rights will be entrenched.

Very dramatic of you.

This is very simple. If you break the law (Tommy) you can get arrested. If you violate a platform's rules (Alex Jones) you can get banned. He still has his Twitter account, he still has his website. He can still post to his heart's content.

When you do stuff like this:

"he addressed Russia investigation special counsel Robert Mueller on his show, imitated firing a gun, and said, “You’re going to get it, or I’m going to die trying.”

Some platforms might feel it violates the inciting violence stuff they have in their terms.

Then, he had other violations.

Again, if you break the law or the rules of a platform, don't start crying when action is taken. Simple to understand.

 

[JB Lions]

One year after Charlottesville, the alt-right is gathering again — in Washington

That's this coming Saturday.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/o...g-again-—-in-washington/ar-BBLzycq?li=BBnb7Kz

----------------------------------
Karl Rove Tells Trump to ‘Tone Down the Rhetoric’: Stalin Used Phrase ‘Enemy of the People’
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...e-‘enemy-of-the-people’/ar-BBLzrmw?li=BBnb7Kz

 

[mr-x]

Another American Success Story to Shocking for Facebook. ( She's a Republican )

Campaign ad blocked from FB

 

[mr-x]

Ad hominem again cuz you can't counter my point. Lmao

Laugh your ass off, while looking up the meaning of ad hominem. You implied Sarah Palin was only successful because she was a good looking woman. More than once.

You're not very smart.

 

[mr-x]

It's funny you mentioned wiki cuz when i checked wiki I learnt Hillary's political,career started way earlier than Palin's and is more robust. I bet you think trump is smarter than Obama right?

How many elections has Hillary won? Two. The first election Hillary won was in the year 2000.

Sarah Palin has won FIVE, without help from an ex President. The first election Sarah won was 1992

Maybe you didn't follow the 2016 election because you were in OCS ( sure ), but DNC rigged the democratic primary for President of the USA so Hillary could beat Berni Sanders. Google it.

Hillary Clinton couldn't even win the democratic primary without help from her friends, Donna Brazil and Debbie Schultz.

 

[mr-x]

Aren't you the braniac that said the electoral college "was rigged"?

"Take California out"- you just destroyed your argument by basing it on a hypothetical. We shouldn't take Cali out because it's part of America and there's not 1 good reason to. Hypothetical aren't real arguments so pls try again.

 

[mr-x]

How is my post racist?because I talk about racism and tell u who I think is racist?ur just trying to guilt trip/ad hominem me by saying my post is racist .counter it or accept it as facts.

@DNWon dont "triple ad hominem me" bro.

"But what if a black man did all that Trump has done so far? yes, you and i know it- 100% he would've been impeached already. You biased."

Claiming I or anyone else would be treated differently because of race without proof is race baiting. You're projecting your own bigotry on others and slandering them.

If a black President did what Donald Trump is doing, we'd be thanking him and defending him even more because democrats would be calling him uncle tom and race traitor.

Don't believe me? Ask Kanye. People who can think for themselves are frightening
https://www.rte.ie/entertainment/2018/0502/959664-kanye-west-attacked-for-presenting-new-ideas/

or The Honorable Clarence Thomas or Dr Thomas Sowell

@kemjika11 you might be a smart domain investor, but you know almost nothing about US politics.

 

[mr-x]

A Sign of the Times? Pastor Greg Laurie Forced to Remove Billboards Featuring the Bible - because of threats
http://www1.cbn.com/cbnnews/us/2018...rced-to-remove-billboards-featuring-the-bible

 

[mr-x]

By far the most racist post I've ever read on this thread! Well done kemjika!

I don't know.. this might have been even more racist. I wonder what @enlytend and @Kate think about it.

She wasnt stupid....but she wasn't smart either. She said a lotta dumb sh*t. If she wasn't white and cute where would have political career gone? nowhere, and you know that too.

 

[.X.]

"rigged system" Created in 1787 by the founders of our nation. Read this then get back to me with any questions about how our Republic is setup.
https://www.history.com/topics/electoral-college

It is only rigged when the lefties lose, Remember the hanging chad in the GWB - Gore election, Then Obama gets voted in, But that election had absolutely no corruption, never, no way. That is the mind of the Liberals

 

[enlytend]

Sarah Palin was a bad miscalculation on the part of the Republican Party. It looked like she was pushed onto the ticket as an afterthought because someone had the bright idea that she would appeal to women voters without offending or threatening the men in their base.

It backfired badly - two words out of her mouth showed what a poor choice she was, and women voters weren’t buying it. If anything, they were offended by the lame and transparent attempt to get their votes.

If they were serious about advancing women in politics, there were much more qualified women they could have chosen. But maybe not as pretty or as malleable.

 

[enlytend]

Hmm - I don’t know about “extremely likely”, but it would be funny as hell if this was a prank... Would be awesome if t-shirt sales proceeds went to support “blue wave” candidates...
It's Looking Extremely Likely That QAnon Is A Leftist Prank On Trump Supporters
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/amphtml/ryanhatesthis/its-looking-extremely-likely-that-qanon-is-probably-a

More likely GRU, like “guccifer 2.0”

 

[kemjika11]

Laugh your ass off, while looking up the meaning of ad hominem. You implied Sarah Palin was only successful because she was a good looking woman. More than once.

You're not very smart.

WRONG. I Implied Sarah Palin's look were her only advantage OVER Hillary. I knew you would miss that though, cuz im proving your "girl"is a lightweight and its probably true.

"You're not very smart"- Ad hominem again.

 

[kemjika11]

How many elections has Hillary won? Two. The first election Hillary won was in the year 2000.

Sarah Palin has won FIVE, without help from an ex President. The first election Sarah won was 1992

Maybe you didn't follow the 2016 election because you were in OCS ( sure ), but DNC rigged the democratic primary for President of the USA so Hillary could beat Berni Sanders. Google it.

Hillary Clinton couldn't even win the democratic primary without help from her friends, Donna Brazil and Debbie Schultz.

The same people who think Sarah Palin is better/smarter than Hillary CLinton are probably the same people who think Trump is smarter than Obama. They're hopeless and not analytical+ objective enough.

 

[mr-x]

Sarah Palin was a bad miscalculation on the part of the Republican Party. It looked like she was pushed onto the ticket as an afterthought because someone had the bright idea that she would appeal to women voters without offending or threatening the men in their base.

It backfired badly - two words out of her mouth showed what a poor choice she was, and women voters weren’t buying it. If anything, they were offended by the lame and transparent attempt to get their votes.

If they were serious about advancing women in politics, there were much more qualified women they could have chosen. But maybe not as pretty or as malleable.

So you agree with @kemjika11 that she's only successful because she a good looking white woman?

 

[mr-x]

WRONG. I Implied Sarah Palin's look were her only advantage OVER Hillary. I knew you would miss that though, cuz im proving your "girl"is a lightweight and its probably true.

"You're not very smart"- Ad hominem again.

"If she wasn't white and cute where would have political career gone? nowhere" ~ kemjika11

You're a dumb racist. You're only arguments are clichés you've heard or read.

 

[mr-x]

Sarah Palin was a bad miscalculation on the part of the Republican Party. It looked like she was pushed onto the ticket as an afterthought because someone had the bright idea that she would appeal to women voters without offending or threatening the men in their base.

It backfired badly - two words out of her mouth showed what a poor choice she was, and women voters weren’t buying it. If anything, they were offended by the lame and transparent attempt to get their votes.

If they were serious about advancing women in politics, there were much more qualified women they could have chosen. But maybe not as pretty or as malleable.

"But maybe not as pretty or as malleable" Why am I surprised? At least we know that's one problem Hillary didn't have. Being pretty I mean.

 

[mr-x]

Racist like you are never analytical or objective.

The same people who think Sarah Palin is better/smarter than Hillary CLinton are probably the same people who think Trump is smarter than Obama. They're hopeless and not analytical+ objective enough.

 

[kemjika11]

Racist like you are never analytical or objective.

if only you were right...