NameSilo
SpaceshipSpaceship
Watch

Who is to Blame for the Troubled US Economy?

  • This poll is still running and the standings may change.
  • Both Parties

    305 
    votes
    45.6%
  • Neither Party

    58 
    votes
    8.7%
  • Democrats

    150 
    votes
    22.4%
  • Republicans

    156 
    votes
    23.3%
  • This poll is still running and the standings may change.

Here you can spout your USA political views.

Rules:
1. Keep it clean
2. No fighting
3. Respect the views of others.
4. US Political views, No Religious views
5. Have fun :)

:wave:
 
16
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
AfternicAfternic
I give it 9 more days until people โ€“ hopefully, but not likely โ€“ realize how bias these polls are.

They've been pretty accurate all the past elections, except Rasmussen.

This is the main one I'm looking at - http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/

right now, 78.9%, that's before the new polls that will come out, after that new FBI/email announcement

Will make a note the morning of election. He factors that kind of stuff in with his predictions, how some polls have more Dems or Repubs. After going 49/50 in 2012, then 50/50 last election, I'm really curious how he'll do this time. Some very close states. We'll know shortly.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Just wanted to repost this from Breitbart, since I know a lot of Trump fans like them, from last election:

The Polls Were Right, We Were Wrong, and That's the Good News

Not only did the Real Clear Politics poll of polls end up being almost perfectly precise, but the most accurate pollster of the 2012 election cycle ended up being the Daily Kosโ€™ Public Policy Polling (PPP). My guys, Gallup and Rasmussen, didnโ€™t even make the top twenty.


http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2012/11/08/polls-right-we-wrong/

Real Clear Politics, who Breitbart admit was the most precise:

Clinton +4.3
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...s/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html
 
Last edited:
0
•••
They've been pretty accurate all the past elections, except Rasmussen.

This is the main one I'm looking at - http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/

right now, 78.9%, that's before the new polls that will come out, after that new FBI/email announcement

Will make a note the morning of election. He factors that kind of stuff in with his predictions, how some polls have more Dems or Repubs. After going 49/50 in 2012, then 50/50 last election, I'm really curious how he'll do this time. Some very close states. We'll know shortly.
I don't doubt the accuracy of past polls. It's these ones that I do. Call me a conspiracy theorist, but I believe that they're bought in the sense to only sample left-leaning counties to apply to the entire state. This, in theory, could cause two reactions: 1) the worst case, Trump supporters elect not to cast a ballot because they've been washed to believe there's no hope or 2) they'll push even harder and prove the fact that these polls are rigged.
 
2
•••
get
 
0
•••
You know whats funny? JB Lions is actively discussing this stuff here and what is Gilsan doing in the meanwhile (since the dawn of times)? Posting funny memes.

Maybe because JB actually has arguments and facts?
I don't doubt the accuracy of past polls. It's these ones that I do. Call me a conspiracy theorist, but I believe that they're bought in the sense to only sample left-leaning counties to apply to the entire state. This, in theory, could cause two reactions: 1) the worst case, Trump supporters elect not to cast a ballot because they've been washed to believe there's no hope or 2) they'll push even harder and prove the fact that these polls are rigged.
"2) they'll push even harder and prove the fact that these polls are rigged."

All this would mean is that the polls were inaccurate this time.
 
1
•••
(oops...)
 
Last edited:
0
•••
trumpkin.jpg
 
1
•••
@JB Lions , what's up with the polls lately, my friend?
 
0
•••
0
•••
I just want to quote your posts after Trump wins the White House. :-D
 
0
•••
CwHf_cuWcAQYUag.jpg
 
0
•••
The pathetic MSM photoshops a Hillary Rally by faking it's size. When it's the Trump rallies they don't like to show the size of the crowds, which are allways enormous. How low will they go. This is part of the rigging process going on.

Actual pathetic Hillary crowd.

Cv_UrxzUsAAvEzQ.jpg


Crowd after the MSM photoshops dozens or hundreds of fake supporters. If they're gonna deceive their readers, they should at least get someone who's good at Photoshop.
Cv_Urx1VUAEbndt.jpg
 
0
•••
Cv_oIaNVYAAV-nB.jpg
 
1
•••
The New York Times features a photo of Hillary Clinton being welcomed to an early voting site in Pompano Beach, Florida on Sundayโ€ฆ surrounded by screaming TRUMP supporters! LOL
hillary-trump-signs-575x382.jpg
 
0
•••
0
•••
0
•••
Hillary referring to Huma as "one of my staffers", no longer stronger together I guess.
 
0
•••
Shocking! Democrat Poll Workers Are Corrupt A-Holes!!

 
1
•••
Last edited:
0
•••
Did you miss my recent post with Breitbart admitting Gallup was one of the worst, not even in the top 20? Then I'm not sure what that has to do with my post, since I use the one that was 99% accurate over last 2 elections.

More like avoided it..
 
0
•••
Spaceship
Domain Recover
CatchDoms
NameMaxi - Your Domain Has Buyers
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the pageโ€™s height.
Back