SpaceshipSpaceship
Watch

Who is to Blame for the Troubled US Economy?

  • This poll is still running and the standings may change.
  • Both Parties

    305 
    votes
    45.6%
  • Neither Party

    58 
    votes
    8.7%
  • Democrats

    150 
    votes
    22.4%
  • Republicans

    156 
    votes
    23.3%
  • This poll is still running and the standings may change.

Here you can spout your USA political views.

Rules:
1. Keep it clean
2. No fighting
3. Respect the views of others.
4. US Political views, No Religious views
5. Have fun :)

:wave:
 
16
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
Unstoppable Domains — AI StorefrontUnstoppable Domains — AI Storefront
Hard evidence of FRAUD

What you call hard evidence I call a 3 year old opinion piece by a Gregory Fegel. Assuming you don't have a subscription to pravda (that would be socialist wouldn't it?), I assume this was a google find:

Maybe something like:

climategate global warming hoax

Entry #1!

But still. A lot has happened since then - a number of inquiries have been completed by a number of different groups. Be sure to let us know when you catch up.
 
0
•••
1
•••
It's nothing more than Obama kiss ass Liberal propaganda. In other words... it's Garbage with a big G

How do you know?
 
1
•••
1
•••
0
•••
1
•••
You actually cited a second-hand English translation of a Pravda op-ed piece as hard evidence of a global hoax?

Um, the hard evidence of FRAUD is in the emails, many of which are from James Hansen of NASA himself who perpetuated the GW FRAUD.

It's scientists like Hansen and others who tell us Global Warming is real, and it's fools like the mainstream media and environmental crazies who believe it.

If I may ask, where is your hard evidence that Man Made C02 caused the earth to warm my .75 degree?.. Fact is it doesn't exist, all that exist on the global warming side is hand picked graphs, flawed models, and speculation from scientists who receive funding by their local Government.
 
1
•••
"It's scientists like Hansen and others who tell us Global Warming is real, and it's fools like the mainstream media and environmental crazies who believe it."

It's people who can read a thermometer. And all graphs show it's warming, like the ones I posted. Ooh, that evil thermometer, that scientific tricky thingy.
 
1
•••
Um, the hard evidence of FRAUD is in the emails, many of which are from James Hansen of NASA himself who perpetuated the GW FRAUD.

It's scientists like Hansen and others who tell us Global Warming is real, and it's fools like the mainstream media and environmental crazies who believe it.

If I may ask, where is your hard evidence that Man Made C02 caused the earth to warm my .75 degree?.. Fact is it doesn't exist, all that exist on the global warming side is hand picked graphs, flawed models, and speculation from scientists who receive funding by their local Government.

Do some research on the polar ice and what happens when it disappears in the next few years. Unless, of course, you think that the melting is a fraud, too. Really doesn't matter, anyway. It's going to happen, and the results will affect us all.
 
1
•••
Do some research on the polar ice and what happens when it disappears in the next few years. Unless, of course, you think that the melting is a fraud, too. Really doesn't matter, anyway. It's going to happen, and the results will affect us all.

I've been waiting for over 5 years when Al Gore stated the Polar Ice cap would completely gone in 5 years.. And yet NO change.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...le-would-be-ice-free-this-year-guess-not-huh/

And now your asking me to wait a few more years? I suppose in a few more years you'll still be here asking me to wait a few more, and few more.

Hasn't happened and it wont happen....But even if I accept your argument the Ice caps will disappear, WHERE is the evidence that shows Mankind is to blame?

If its a result of solar variation as many suggest, then how will cap and trade change anything? it WONT.
 
1
•••
2 months ago it was the "Fiscal Cliff" and now it's the "Sequester". :o Is it Quentin Tarantino's next Movie? What the hell is it? :-/

Is it the next Economic meltdown, 1000 times worse than the "Fiscal Cliff", is it George W. Bush's fault ... again? Is it the Republicans fault as the Obama Kiss Ass Media keeps telling us? Why aren't the markets panicking yet?

Are people getting their underground bunkers, their AR-15's and canned food + water ready for the dark days, weeks, months ahead?

Somebody please explain to me.... before the repercussions of this apparent Economic Armageddon hits our shores, on this side of the pond.

What the hell is the "Sequester"?
D-:
 
1
•••
I've been waiting for over 5 years when Al Gore stated the Polar Ice cap would completely gone in 5 years.. And yet NO change.

Now your source is an Al Gore speech?

I do pity the fools that are trying to get in on the Bering Strait shipping routes. What are they thinking? They're never going to get through all that ice.
 
1
•••
popliveoncube.jpg
 
2
•••
popsb.jpg
 
2
•••
I've been waiting for over 5 years when Al Gore stated the Polar Ice cap would completely gone in 5 years.. And yet NO change.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...le-would-be-ice-free-this-year-guess-not-huh/

And now your asking me to wait a few more years? I suppose in a few more years you'll still be here asking me to wait a few more, and few more.

Hasn't happened and it wont happen....But even if I accept your argument the Ice caps will disappear, WHERE is the evidence that shows Mankind is to blame?

If its a result of solar variation as many suggest, then how will cap and trade change anything? it WONT.

You are really stuck on cap and trade. You have an uncle who is CEO of a multi-national or something? Afraid Exxon's profits are going to drop from 100 billion to 95 billion, and 1000 execs will only get nine million dollar bonuses instead 10? How is cap & trade hurting you? How would it help you if it disappeared? Or are you going to just rant vagaries about the economy. Do you think pollution is real, or do you think it's all a fraud? Have you ever researched the awful big city smog of 40 years ago compared to today? Compared our air quality with Mexico City, Shanghai, Mumbai, Bangkok and others with no do-gooder liberal clean air laws in place, and tell me it hasn't made a huge difference.

If mankind plays no part, if you are right that cap and trade changes nothing, then there's really no harm done. In a few years that truth will emerge and C/T will fade away. But what if you are wrong? You make fun of Gore for being wrong in his predictions of an ice-free Northwest Passage, but then base your "hasn't happened and won't happen" on the same Gore prediction that you think illustrates how wrong he is, You screech about fraud and proof, yet your proof is absurd. Quoting the utter nonsense of an opinion piece in Pravda as proof of anything is embarrassing.

As for Al Gore and the polar cap, "Hasn't happened and it won't happen"... Are you serious? Exactly where are you finding scientific evidence that the polar ice cap is not dwindling? 2012 was the worst year on record for the ice mass; it dropped to 24%, the least amount ever recorded. You squawk about proof of mankind's contribution to increasing greenhouse gasses, yet you find nothing wrong with claiming the Arctic polar cap is just peachy because Al Gore's prediction of an ice-free northwest passage is off by a few years? It's absurd.

Out of curiosity, do you believe dinosaurs existed?
 
Last edited:
3
•••
1
•••
1
•••
If you read the whole thing, it was just a slip of the tongue, she meant 170,000. Plus the Blaze is Glenn Beck's baby. He was too crazy even for Fox.
So the Blaze is lying?
 
1
•••
So the Blaze is lying?

It's more of you not reading the whole article as usual and/or leaving parts out. Really, is this the best you can come up with? I'm sure there is some real issue out there you can post about.
 
1
•••
1
•••
Appraise.net

We're social

Spaceship
Domain Recover
CatchDoms
DomainEasy — Live Options
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back