SpaceshipSpaceship
Watch

Who is to Blame for the Troubled US Economy?

  • This poll is still running and the standings may change.
  • Both Parties

    305 
    votes
    45.6%
  • Neither Party

    58 
    votes
    8.7%
  • Democrats

    150 
    votes
    22.4%
  • Republicans

    156 
    votes
    23.3%
  • This poll is still running and the standings may change.

Here you can spout your USA political views.

Rules:
1. Keep it clean
2. No fighting
3. Respect the views of others.
4. US Political views, No Religious views
5. Have fun :)

:wave:
 
17
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
Unstoppable Domains — AI StorefrontUnstoppable Domains — AI Storefront
Ford's testimony set for 10 Am Thursday. That gives scumbag democrats FIVE days to scream, kick their feet and lie about how weak women are and how cruel republican men are.

*** Latest press release, Ford's attorney claims they are still negotiating conditions of Ford's testimony.

giphy.gif


"its unfair to demand that she [ Ford ] be able to provide evidence for something that happens decades ago. SO WHY IS IT FAIR FOR KAVANAUGH TO HAVE TO DEFEND THE OPPOSITE" ~ Sooper Mexican.
 
Last edited:
2
•••
Ford's testimony set for 10 Am Thursday.

Oh, so she is testifying. Nice you can poke fun at yourself with that cartoon above. I lost track of how many times you said she wasn't. When is Feinstein apologizing again? Did you ever catch that video that was floating around so you can post it?

A lot of your posts today is calling her a liar, before you even hear her on Thursday.
 
0
•••
Ford's testimony set for 10 Am Thursday. That gives scumbag democrats FIVE days to scream, kick their feet and lie about how weak women are and how cruel republican men are.
Why politicize the case ? This is another way of trivializing the distress of (alleged) victims. Can't we leave politics aside ?
 
0
•••
We’ve been over why victims don’t come forward in this thread and on every social media site. Read and educate yourself a little.

TL;DR - part of it is because of people giving victims precisely the kind of crap you, Gil and Mr x are handing out.

Death threats. People are threatening her and her kids over this. Because she dared to publically come out and say “wait a minute - this guy you’re questioning, who could potentially be deciding the laws of our country once TRIED TO RAPE ME.”

She started “speaking up” years before the SCOTUS” nominations.

If her account is true, Kavanaugh committed an offense for which he would have been tried as an adult and put on sex offender lists if convicted. Not exactly a poster child for deciding the highest level legal issues in the nation.

As for her being an “anti trump liberal” - that describes about half the country and in this case it’s totally irrelevant. If they vote Kavanaugh down, he remains a federal judge, they pick the next conservative candidate on the list and repeat. The only thing this accomplishes is potentially keeping a would be rapist off the highest court in the land.

You’ll get your conservative judge, but maybe this one is wrong for the job.
You are so wrong it is hard to know where to start. First, like a typically left wing liberal youtake the elitist approach and assume I am unread. Maybe if you guys stopped making ignorant assumptions like that you would stop losing elections.

Second, you think the republicans would ever get a conservative into the Supreme Court if the dems take the house back you are incorrect. This whole issue is not about sexual harassment, it is about denying the will of the people because the dem liberal minority are elitists who think democracy should take a back seat to their agenda. I have the deepest respect for women who have been victimized but she ain’t one of them.

Good God does it even bother you that you are referring to him as a would be rapist? If I told you that 35 years ago your mom sexually harassed me - and I offered no proof, zero, to back it up, would you go around referring to your mom as a would be rapist?
 
3
•••
I have the deepest respect for women who have been victimized but she ain’t one of them.

Good God does it even bother you that you are referring to him as a would be rapist? If I told you that 35 years ago your mom sexually harassed me - and I offered no proof, zero, to back it up, would you go around referring to your mom as a would be rapist?

Ugh, are you all brain dead? Maybe, wait until you actually hear from both of them first? That would be the logical thing to do. Something that seems to escape Trump supporters.

She gains nothing out of this.
 
0
•••
I honestly was leaning more towards the fourth view that I posted, that she had reasons to not talk about it before, and now she thinks it's important to do so. I suppose the first one was supposed to be how some republicans seem to be viewing that perspective.

And the second one was the one which I thought a few people here were subscribing to, which they confirmed. I tried to make it sound a bit absurd, like "this professor comes out of nowhere and has therapist's notes about an attempted rape..but she's just making it up," but it's not absurd to some people so..my bad.

Sorry for the pointless post :xf.wink:

My mother is Mormon, and you can find old quotes of Mormon leaders saying or writing disturbing things akin to "your virtue / chastity is more valuable than your life" and using strange euphemisms for rape, like "nonconsensual immorality." They recently excommunicated a guy for protesting too much about what he believes were important problems regarding sexual things in the organization. She's probably had stupid shit drilled into her head throughout her life. So we talked about this other day, and she was doubting the accuser a bit and saying some victim-blaming stuff :| I was trying to play the other side of the argument to make her see how she could be wrong.

I don't know what's true in this situation even though I have my opinion, so I maybe I will shut my piehole now and wait and see what happens.
 
1
•••
Christine Ford: “I was assaulted by that man. I HAVE WITNESSES!

Every witness: Nope, never happened. I wasn’t there. In any case, that man is nothing like that and never was like that.

Christine Ford: You can’t believe what the witnesses say! Nothing happened to them! It happened to me, not them. I HAVE WITNESSES!
 
1
•••
Last edited:
1
•••
Another day ending in Y

Another day, another dumb post. You're getting real good at it, lots of practice in. Are you going to post that video you said was floating around? I can't tell if that's just another lie or you being gullible again and you read that off some site without checking. Which is it?
 
0
•••
You are so wrong it is hard to know where to start. First, like a typically left wing liberal youtake the elitist approach and assume I am unread. Maybe if you guys stopped making ignorant assumptions like that you would stop losing elections.

Second, you think the republicans would ever get a conservative into the Supreme Court if the dems take the house back you are incorrect. This whole issue is not about sexual harassment, it is about denying the will of the people because the dem liberal minority are elitists who think democracy should take a back seat to their agenda. I have the deepest respect for women who have been victimized but she ain’t one of them.

Good God does it even bother you that you are referring to him as a would be rapist? If I told you that 35 years ago your mom sexually harassed me - and I offered no proof, zero, to back it up, would you go around referring to your mom as a would be rapist?

You know the libs are having a bad day when every post is an ad hominem.
 
1
•••
I honestly was leaning more towards the fourth view that I posted, that she had reasons to not talk about it before, and now she thinks it's important to do so. I suppose the first one was supposed to be how some republicans seem to be viewing that perspective.

And the second one was the one which I thought a few people here were subscribing to, which they confirmed. I tried to make it sound a bit absurd, like "this professor comes out of nowhere and has therapist's notes about an attempted rape..but she's just making it up," but it's not absurd to some people so..my bad.

Sorry for the pointless post :xf.wink:

My mother is Mormon, and you can find old quotes of Mormon leaders saying or writing disturbing things akin to "your virtue / chastity is more valuable than your life" and using strange euphemisms for rape, like "nonconsensual immorality." They recently excommunicated a guy for protesting too much about what he believes were important problems regarding sexual things in the organization. She's probably had stupid sh*t drilled into her head throughout her life. So we talked about this other day, and she was doubting the accuser a bit and saying some victim-blaming stuff :| I was trying to play the other side of the argument to make her see how she could be wrong.

I don't know what's true in this situation even though I have my opinion, so I maybe I will shut my piehole now and wait and see what happens.
Maybe she was a loose and fancy free 15 year old that loved to party and drink and then got horny, seduced some young boy or boys she can't remember who they were and then 36 years later, for political reasons, with the help of very willing Democrats + the Liberal Media she comes out with this BS story at the most convenient of times!!!

Lots of horny 15 year olds out there, with Hollywood constantly teaching them a lot of new tricks!
 
0
•••
Seems to me, even conservative media has been tip-toeing around calling Ford a liar. Absolutely no proof it happened. Every witness for the accuser says it didn't happen.

No compulsions from the left slandering a mans reputation or ruining he career on the flimsiest of charges.
 
1
•••
Seems to me, even conservative media has been tip-toeing around calling Ford a liar.

So you're admitting even Conservative media, which is a bit of a joke, are even more rational than the people posting in this thread? Do you think they might be waiting until she actually testifies? That would be the sensible thing to do. Can you explain how it's not, and how you calling somebody a liar before, makes more sense? Maybe you should wait and hear her side, then decide? You've already looked plenty of stupid this week, while pile on?
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Ford's testimony set for 10 Am Thursday. That gives scumbag democrats FIVE days to scream, kick their feet and lie about how weak women are and how cruel republican men are.
I'm willing to bet that she won't testify on Thursday. The Dems and her communist lawyers will invent another delay tactic to avoid it... again.

Sen. Grassley is in need of a spine transplant...
 
Last edited:
0
•••
If you had quoted my whole post, instead of one sentence out of context, you'd have your answer.

So you're admitting even Conservative media, which is a bit of a joke, are even more rational than the people posting in this thread? Do you think they might be waiting until she actually testifies? That would be the sensible thing to do. Can you explain how it's not, and how you calling somebody a liar before, makes more sense? Maybe you should wait and hear her side, then decide? You've already looked plenty of stupid this week, while pile on?
 
0
•••
If I told you that 35 years ago your mom sexually harassed me - and I offered no proof, zero, to back it up, would you go around referring to your mom as a would be rapist?

1 Sexual harassment and attempted rape are different things. Neither is good, but harassment can be anything from an inappropriate off-color joke on up.
2 I knew my mother. Do you personally know Mr Kavanaugh? Or Dr. Blasey-Ford? If not, what grounds (other than projecting your own political bias) do you have for saying she’s the liar?
Everybody thought Cosby’s first accuser was lying.
2a I very clearly said we need to investigate and hear them both out and see where that takes us. I’m not saying he’s unquestionably guilty, though for me what we’ve seen SO FAR make me lean in that direction. Friend of a friend knows her and vouches for her character and apparent lack of ulterior motive. She wouldn’t want to see him appointed to the Supreme Court if he was a liberal democrat. That’s not the issue.
3. If you said my Mom harrassed you, no, I wouldn’t have believed you. Now if it was my aunt...she was a pretty cheeky lady well into her 90’s. Thankfully, she was never up for consideration for the Supreme Court!
 
Last edited:
1
•••
Excuse for butting in.

1 Sexual harassment and attempted rape are different things. Neither is good, but harassment can be anything from an inappropriate off-color joke on up.

Yes, but liberals are on TV saying Kavanaugh tried to rape ford. Think Progress, Move On..

2 I knew my mother. Do you personally know Mr Kavanaugh? Or Dr. Blasey-Ford? If not, what grounds (other than projecting your own political bias) do you have for saying she’s the liar?
Everybody thought Cosby’s first accuser was lying.

You keep pretending we don't know anything about Kavanaugh despite decades sitting on the bench, statements by the women who worked with him or for him. There have literally been over a 100 people that KNOW Kavanaugh vouch for his character.

At the same time, we're supposed to believe CB Ford who we know almost nothing about. Her story has evolved / changed at least twice. No one who knows Ford is stepping up talking about what a great and fair person she is. Not her students, not her co-workers.

You want us to ignore what we know about Kavanaugh, and disbelieve him, Then ignore what we know about CB Ford, ignore the witnesses and believe her anyway.

You make ZERO sense.

2a I very clearly said we need to investigate and hear them both out and see where that takes up. I’m not saying he’s unquestionably guilty, though for me what we’ve seen SO FAR make me lean in that direction. Friend of a friend knows her and vouches for her character and apparent lack of ulterior motive.

There is ZERO evidence Ford is telling the truth but your gossip group is reliable than the actual evidence we know of. How is anyone supposed to take you seriously?

3. If you said my Mom harrassed you, no, I wouldn’t have believed you. Now if it was my aunt...she was a pretty cheeky lady well into her 90’s. Thankfully, she was never up for consideration for the Supreme Court!

I don't even know what to say.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
Hmmm... looks like things are about to get interesting...

41594908-C0C4-415C-BF1B-73B2E55BF740.jpeg
 
1
•••
Last edited:
0
•••
Ramirez is not Avenatti’s client, so it sounds like there’s a third one.
 
0
•••
Dynadot — .com TransferDynadot — .com Transfer
Appraise.net

We're social

Escrow.com
Spaceship
Rexus Domain
CryptoExchange.com
Domain Recover
CatchDoms
DomainEasy — Payment Flexibility
DomDB
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back