The .TEL Discussion Thread

[brendan52190]

Hi

For this, let's assume that .tel will not be a total flop.

What type of keywords will be most valuable for this extension? Will it be geographical keywords, like newyork.tel, losangeles.tel, etc, or what else?

 

[mjnels]

Mjnels has been spamming this less-than-newsworthy FoxNews "dot Mobey" thing here (I wish he would post this stuff elsewhere ... ) for well in to one year now ... but at the end of the day, it is still not a developed stand-alone "dot Mobey" site, and Fox™ has invested sum total $0.00 in its actual development of this trademarked domain name, IMHO. :red:
It seems yet another desperate attempt to keep the struggling "dot Mobey" hype machine active, I agree.



Good Luck with your highly brandable .TEL's, Phase! :gl: :talk:

-Jeff

i was responding to your claims. sorry, im as free to comment on dotMOBI as you are. you're always the one that brings it up, but seem to get upset when you get disproved.

a TLD is not dead if its on national news everyday.... im sorry Jeff, it has happened.

 

[Keith]

and Fox™ has invested sum total $0.00 in its actual development of this trademarked domain name, IMHO.

Well at least you said "IMHO", cause in all honesty you have no
clue what Fox has or has'nt done financially in regards to .mobi.

What cannot be disputed is the fact that Fox advertises Foxnews.mobi
every few seconds around the clock. They also have Foxnews.mobi plastered
on the top of the mobile site for all users to see.

Safe to say you've lost this argument friend :bingo:

 

[Jeff]

$0.00

Well at least you said "IMHO", cause in all honesty you have no
clue what Fox has or has'nt done financially in regards to .mobi.

Link: http://foxnews.proteus.com << -- >> foxnews.proteus.com :red:

Case closed. :yell:

Onward and upward.
-Jeff

 

[namewaiter]

Link: http://foxnews.proteus.com << -- >> foxnews.proteus.com :red:

Case closed. :yell:

Onward and upward.
-Jeff

too funny! wonder why they don't market this address?

 

[qO_Op]

.

 

[Jeff]

Have you got a screw loose?

Not at all ... here is the actual developed website: foxnews.proteus.com

Fox™ couldn't even be bothered with developing its own ™ stand-alone "dot Mobey" ... and that's really pretty embarrassing if you're one of the few remaining "dot Mobey" enthusiasts, in my view. :red:

Otherwise, back on to the engaging topic of the short and very highly brandable .TEL! :talk:

-Jeff

 

[mjnels]

Not at all ... here is the actual developed website: foxnews.proteus.com

Fox™ couldn't even be bothered with developing its own ™ stand-alone "dot Mobey" ... and that's really pretty embarrassing if you're one of the few remaining "dot Mobey" enthusiasts, in my view. :red:

Otherwise, back on to the engaging topic of the short and very highly brandable .TEL! :talk:

-Jeff

frivolous and desperate argument.

also, the iphone version is iphone.foxnews.com... but the only site they advertise is FoxNews.mobi so people dont have to remember 3 different sites for 3 different phones.

 

[qO_Op]

.

Otherwise, back on to the engaging topic of the short and very highly brandable .TEL! :talk:

Agreed!

 

[Jeff]

frivolous and desperate argument.

Here is the one single FACT ... the actual developed website is: foxnews.proteus.com

Otherwise, back on to the engaging topic of the short and very highly brandable .TEL! :talk:

Agreed!

Sounds good, onward and upward. :talk:
-Jeff

 

[mjnels]

Here is the one single FACT ... the actual developed website is: foxnews.proteus.com

not true... that is not the single fact. it is also at iphone.foxnews.com

but they advertise only FoxNews.mobi so you dont have to remember a bunch of sites... i challenge you to show me otherwise.

 

[Jeff]

Undeveloped ™ domain name fox news "dot Mobey" redirects to:
foxnews.proteus.com :red:
R.I.P.

Take care for now.
-Jeff

 

[mjnels]

Undeveloped ™ domain name fox news "dot Mobey" redirects to:
foxnews.proteus.com :red:
R.I.P.

Take care for now.
-Jeff

you've lost the argument Jeff.

take care.

 

[Jeff]

you've lost the argument Jeff.

I have stated FACT, and it's indisputable! :yell:

take care.

Good Luck, friend.
-Jeff

 

[mjnels]

I have stated FACT, and it's indisputable! :yell:

apparently it is disputable, because i just disputed it and won like this:

they use multiple address redirects for the mobile site... but they only advertise one address, and its the .MOBI....

*ping*

 

[phase111]

Good Luck with your highly brandable .TEL's, Phase! :gl: :talk:

-Jeff

Thanks for that Sir Jeff... I just felt I should quickly pop out of the shadows to say..(at the risk of sounding like a mod) PLEASE GET OFF THE (long and awkward) .MOBEY TOPIC AND BACK ONTO THE HIGHLY BRANDABLE .TEL TOPIC PLEASE. Thought I was on the wrong thread for a while there. Thanks... Goodnight and Good luck


Be cool, be polite, be professional!! :bah:

 

[onlinelife]

Am i in .mobi topic?

 

[Jeff]

... AND BACK ONTO THE HIGHLY BRANDABLE .TEL TOPIC PLEASE.

Absolutely, that's exactly what I've been saying for some time now here in this thread. :gl:

Otherwise, back on to the engaging topic of the short and very highly brandable .TEL! :talk:

Again, Good Luck with your highly brandable .TEL's! :music:
Goodnight.
-Jeff

 

[mjnels]

Am i in .mobi topic?

i will stop engaging Jeff now... sorry guys.

its funny though, because he does the same thing and simply adds "lets get back on topic" to the end of his posts to pretend like he really wants to get back on topic. neat trick eh?

now lets get back on topic.

 

[CDM]

ok. returning to the topic at hand, what do you feel will be the potential for a city.tel with population of 1 million plus?

 

[MicroGuy]

ok. returning to the topic at hand, what do you feel will be the potential for a city.tel with population of 1 million plus?

It has approximately the same potential (probably less) than a city.mp, another heavily marketed TLD: http://chi.mp/