SpaceshipSpaceship
SpaceshipSpaceship
NamecheapNamecheap
Watch

InvisionTech

Established Member
Impact
133
It seems .PRO is slowly coming out of the cage with cheaper reg prices than they were a year ago and major registrars like netsol taking notice of the extension and promoting it. B-)

Here are some that I picked up in last couple of days:

Alexandria.pro

Anchorage.pro

Arlington.pro

Belfast.pro

Birmingham.pro

Budapest.pro

Durham.pro

Fairfax.pro

Italian.pro

Lisbon.pro

Fire away with your regs after the relaunch on September 8th, 2008.
 
3
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
GoDaddyGoDaddy
Sound Pro is 8 out of 10 on Google.com, you have i-Sound WMA MP3 Recorder - Streaming Sound Recording software ranked 6 and Raw Power, Lincoln UK - Karaoke and DJ Equipment Suppliers ranked 7. Looking for a 10 out of 10, there must be one.

The key is to find a keyword that's very brandable with .pro and closely associated but isn't competed for too hard, that way the domain carries more weight in page ranking and there aren't super sites pushing the Pro URL's off the first page.

Talent.pro is very close to making it 10 out of 10. It has positions 1 to 9 plus 11 and 12. If the site ranked 10 edges down it would be 10 out of 10.
 
0
•••
I have a challenge for you. If I type in Event Pro in Google, all but one of the results on the first page have Event and Pro in the URL before the extension. You get the same 9 from 10 results with Talent Pro. Can anybody name a .pro where all 10 first page Google results contain the keyword and extension in any order before the extension when you search in the format Keyword Pro? As far as I know, this association feature is unique to .pro. If you try in any other extension you don't get anywhere near 10.

Sign Pro - 10/10
Power Pro - 9/10
Home Pro - 8/10

Carpet Pro - 6/10
Ceiling Pro - 6/10 (I own this one)
 
0
•••
The inclusion of the keyword and pro in the URL must be before the extension. Sign Pro is only 6 out of 10 on that basis.
 
0
•••
The inclusion of the keyword and pro in the URL must be before the extension. Sign Pro is only 6 out of 10 on that basis.

It's a 10/10 in my browser. First 10 matches in G are:

* signpro.com
* signpromankato.com
* signpro-usa.com
* ohiosignpro.com
* signproworldwide.com
* signproaz.com
* signprousa.com
* mysignpros.net
* signpro.us
* signpro.org

Screenshot attached.
 

Attachments

  • signpro.JPG
    signpro.JPG
    266.6 KB · Views: 71
0
•••
signpro is 9/10 in my browser, but good find joshuapz
 
0
•••
It's a 10/10 in my browser. First 10 matches in G are:

* signpro.com
* signpromankato.com
* signpro-usa.com
* ohiosignpro.com
* signproworldwide.com
* signproaz.com
* signprousa.com
* mysignpros.net
* signpro.us
* signpro.org

Screenshot attached.

Yep, same here! :lala:
 
0
•••
fwiw, sometimes google adjusts its search results to better match a user's interests (their previous searches).
 
0
•••
I can get the 10 out of 10 for Sign Pro when I search Google.com through the proxy HideMyAss.com. That's pretty amazing, I didn't think we'd find a 10 out of 10 keyword pro seach. As I say, I don't think you can do that in any other domain extension, including .com. What it's picking up on is the colossal brandability of .pro.

Every one of those 10 Sign Pro sites would arguably be better off with Sign.pro from a short is better branding angle and if they used a permanent 301 redirect correctly, they could transfer their existing page rank.

Sign.pro is quicker to type for surfing and email addresses, easier to remember, you can use a bigger font on marketing merchandise or business cards, it can be integrated into a logo easier, and is more economical in conveying a business name than .com because you are cutting off 3 letters.

The key to unlocking the potential of .pro is for everybody to be able to use it. By saying only qualified professionals can use .pro, RegistryPro you are throwing away virtually their entire market because accountants, lawyers, and doctors are hired by businesses, they don't necessarily start them or have any influence over what extension is used. An entrepreneur or developer decides what extension to use; entrepreneurs are invariably not professionally qualified and developers don't meet the registration requirements to register a .pro.

RegistryPro have one final opportunity to remove the residual restrictions on .pro when the current registry contract expires in May 2010. ICANN cannot possibly expect RegistryPro to rack up losses for another 5 years with nothing left over for marketing while every new gTLD is sold off with no restrictions. .pro had restriction imposed because it was operating in a tiny club of extensions where it was better to exist with restrictions than not at all.

If RegistryPro don't get restrictions removed in their new contract, I will drop 2/3 of my .pros at the end of 2010. The extension isn't financially viable now with just 6-7 gTLD's and it will go out of business if there are 60-70 new unrestricted registries. There will be no strategic logic for Hostway to continue funding RegistryPro's losses. Total .pros registered will fall to under 10,000 within 2 years.

If RegistryPro got the restrictions removed, they could get on the registration panels of more big registrars before new gTLD's were launched and that would give them an ageing advantage over any new gTLD's which combined with tremendous brandability and a seismic shift in demand that would dwarf what happened in September 2008, could transform the extension's fortunes.
 
0
•••
great input, as always akcampbell
 
0
•••
Great post akcampbell, but I've got a question:
After may 2010, can RegistryPro cancel renewal contract with ICANN or do later? if Yes, it could be a disaster for all .pro owner? can .pro be lost? Because I'm planning to build a website with .pro, now I'm thinking twice because it's a huge website and don't want to loose all effort and money.


I can get the 10 out of 10 for Sign Pro when I search Google.com through the proxy HideMyAss.com. That's pretty amazing, I didn't think we'd find a 10 out of 10 keyword pro seach. As I say, I don't think you can do that in any other domain extension, including .com. What it's picking up on is the colossal brandability of .pro.

Every one of those 10 Sign Pro sites would arguably be better off with Sign.pro from a short is better branding angle and if they used a permanent 301 redirect correctly, they could transfer their existing page rank.

Sign.pro is quicker to type for surfing and email addresses, easier to remember, you can use a bigger font on marketing merchandise or business cards, it can be integrated into a logo easier, and is more economical in conveying a business name than .com because you are cutting off 3 letters.

The key to unlocking the potential of .pro is for everybody to be able to use it. By saying only qualified professionals can use .pro, RegistryPro you are throwing away virtually their entire market because accountants, lawyers, and doctors are hired by businesses, they don't necessarily start them or have any influence over what extension is used. An entrepreneur or developer decides what extension to use; entrepreneurs are invariably not professionally qualified and developers don't meet the registration requirements to register a .pro.

RegistryPro have one final opportunity to remove the residual restrictions on .pro when the current registry contract expires in May 2010. ICANN cannot possibly expect RegistryPro to rack up losses for another 5 years with nothing left over for marketing while every new gTLD is sold off with no restrictions. .pro had restriction imposed because it was operating in a tiny club of extensions where it was better to exist with restrictions than not at all.

If RegistryPro don't get restrictions removed in their new contract, I will drop 2/3 of my .pros at the end of 2010. The extension isn't financially viable now with just 6-7 gTLD's and it will go out of business if there are 60-70 new unrestricted registries. There will be no strategic logic for Hostway to continue funding RegistryPro's losses. Total .pros registered will fall to under 10,000 within 2 years.

If RegistryPro got the restrictions removed, they could get on the registration panels of more big registrars before new gTLD's were launched and that would give them an ageing advantage over any new gTLD's which combined with tremendous brandability and a seismic shift in demand that would dwarf what happened in September 2008, could transform the extension's fortunes.
 
0
•••
Yep, same here! :lala:

I actually wrote a software program about a year ago that Googled "<every dictionary word> pro" and reported back the .pro dictionary words in which the largest number of Google matches containing the keyword and "pro" before the extension came up. Sign.pro, Power.pro, and Event.pro were at the top, but they had already been registered. The best unregistered ones available were Ceiling.pro, Duct.pro, and Finish.pro, and I grabbed all 3. I put them up in the marketplace for only $50 apiece a few weeks back and was surprised to see nobody purchased them as they empirically fit the TLD well have many potential end-user candidates.
 
0
•••
I picked up Event.pro at SnapNames at the weekend, that's how I noticed the unusual keyword extension URL density, there are 35 sites with Event and Pro in the URL before the extension in the first 30 pages of Google.

The thing is association alone isn't enough to make a .pro stand out. You need good keyword stats. For example, Event.com sold for $165,000, event has sold on its own in 3 other extensions, and Event.info has 30 bids on Sedo.

If you look at domain sales for Ceiling and Duct, they are few and far between, Ceiling.com sold for $19,000 and there are only 2 historical domain sales with the word duct in on dnsaleprice.com. To give yourself a chance with .pro, you have to get keywords that sell for a high price in .com, sell several times in other extensions, and happen to have an unusually good fit with .pro.

You could sell Ceiling.pro and Duct.pro for alot more than $50 but you would have to market them to companies operating in these niches. Even then you will come up against registration eligibility issues. Neither have enough keyword pedigree or breadth of appeal to sell on NamePros unless you get very lucky.

I like the sound of the program you wrote, that's very inventive! At the end of 2007 I bought a list of Overture and PPC stats for 17,500 top keywords. I sorted it for different criteria and worked through the top 2,000, 50 at a time, on Encirca's bulk WHOIS checker. Then I drew up lists of available .pros and checked them against goodness of fit benchmarks on Google. The problem with any system is you end up regging alot of rubbish as well as the 1 of 2 genuinely good domains. I regged Desk.pro, Gear.pro, and Trek.pro using this system.

The most reliable way to pick up .pros is on the drop. I picked up Puzzle.pro, Piano.pro, and Play.pro on the drop and recently on SnapNames I've added People.pro, Stockmarket.pro, Politics.pro, StartUp.pro, Template.pro and Event.pro. MJS served up Tennis.pro to keep Golf.pro company and Terol made a move for Chess.pro, both fantastic catches. MJS will be glad to hear when I was was telling my wife's former boss about .pro in a bar a couple of weeks ago the first two .pros he wanted to register were Golf.pro and Tennis.pro. The reason for the recent premium drops is that some people who held .pros under Encirca's Pro Forwarding arrangements presumably didn't meet the revised eligibility requirements so they couldn't renew.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Congratulations on nearly reaching 40K thread views. I wonder how many of those are uniques?
 
0
•••
Those stats are wrong, I have checked this thread at least 50,000 times.
 
0
•••
Thanks for the stats and advice, Mr. Campbell. Always a pleasure to hear your insights. If Duct.pro, Ceiling.pro, etc. aren't even worth $50 reseller despite the Google-sanctioned TLD association, it makes me wonder how many other tens of thousands of .pro domains aren't even worth reg. fee. Some amazing pickups you landed there, too.
 
0
•••
1
•••
I wonder what the system of release will be - auctions most likely - more money for the registry.

I really hope they open it to first come first serve - a couple of single letter .pros would be nice :p

Though I seriously the average registrant is going to get many of these names.
 
0
•••
Before RegistryPro release 1,2, and 3 character .pros they should remove the residual restrictions, then auction the new .pros with the help of a big registrar like Godaddy or Moniker. If they auction these domains off with restrictions, there will only be 40-50 people on this thread bidding.
The Press Release was released on 11 August but dated 19 May which was the date of their previous release so they rolled the old one without changing the date.
 
0
•••
guys check this out

go to google and search for www.*.pro
 
0
•••
guys check this out

go to google and search for www.*.pro

Mostly shows .com and .orgs

You want to see developed .pros?

Try search w/ this-
site:*.pro
 
0
•••
DomainEasy: white label portfolios are live. Enable yours.

We're social

Escrow.com
Spaceship
Escrowly
CryptoExchange.com
Domain Recover
Catchy
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back