Unstoppable Domains โ€” AI Assistant

Spaceship.com - Marketplace Thread

SpaceshipSpaceship
Watch

DomainRecap

Top Member
Impact
9,779
Spaceship.com recently launched a new Marketplace section, and as NamePros has given me the go-head, I think the company deserves its own thread for NP domain marketplace users to converse in.

https://www.spaceship.com/sellerhub/

Personally speaking, I will be setting up a new Spaceship.com account this weekend and going to work investigating its various features, options and policies.
 
Last edited:
24
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
GoDaddyGoDaddy
So they've got one TXT code they give you that doesn't work, but after contacting support, they can give you a second TXT code that does work? :oops::xf.rolleyes:O_o

Yes, The TXT verification code we have working only if a domain never been listed at spaceship before .
 
Last edited:
2
•••
It also takes more than 2 days from them to manually verify the 2nd TXT record, this not sustainable for sure!
I chatted with Support yesterday and they verified the new TXT record right away. I told them it feels clumsy to add another TXT record when I already have an accountโ€‘wide one, and they said they're improving how conflicting domains are handled.
 
3
•••
I chatted with Support yesterday and they verified the new TXT record right away. I told them it feels clumsy to add another TXT record when I already have an accountโ€‘wide one, and they said they're improving how conflicting domains are handled.
Thanks for the update. Can you think of a situation in which the different TXT offers more security that the listing is authentic?
 
2
•••
Thanks for the update. Can you think of a situation in which the different TXT offers more security that the listing is authentic?
Not that I can think of. The account-wide TXT record should be enough.

This manual approach with the different TXT record is a sign of the non-automated domain conflict-resolution process (a.k.a. "quick hack").
 
Last edited:
4
•••
2
•••
Unable to make price changes in SellerHub
2025-10-28 11_31_39-My Domains - Seller Hub.png
 
0
•••
@Marina Savina
@Spaceship
@Edward Marukhian

Dear spaceship ,
Please note that when domain indexed at google results as below screenshot, It is not important readers to see only the general sentence of " The simple , safe way to buy domain and the transfer simple and safe and so on ........ " !!!
You are here advertising only spaceship and its services !!!? Thats it ?? What about the domain itself ?? and the price ??

Instead it should be written clearly with bold font as below example : ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡

"" The Domain 123456.com is for sale at spaceship at price $1999 ,
Buy it now / Make Offer / Lease , It is simple and safe way to buy this domain at spaceship ""


This is the right and professional way to show it to readers/browsers .
Please escalate this issue to your customer support / IT / programmers / coders and whomever can do the change and improve .

--------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------

Look screenshot below how things odd and nothing mentioned about domain and price !!
๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡

1762054396290.png


.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
My experience with the @Spaceship SellerHub thus far.

Two weeks ago I gave them a try.

I imported several thousand names.

Importing was fairly quick and easy using a CSV.

The manual import is a comma nightmare and shouldn't even be offered.

Verifying names that were already listed:

Given the verification process feedback here at NP, I was a little concerned this might be an issue for me given.

However, I was pleasantly surprised when only a few names required verification and support was able to clear them within a few minutes.

Landers: Withouth a doubt, I'm a fan.

They're clean, professional and get indexed quickly.

A few things I didn't care for:

1. I have found that there are too many steps involved in navigating from Spaceship to your domains in the SellerHub marketplace.

2. The @Namecheap path redirects Namecheap customers to a Spaceship.com checkout. I understand why they would do this, but doing so creates buyer confusion. (Path of least resistance and all.)

3. I had planned on doing a little more testing, but when I selected a few hundred names for deletion, the system deleted the entire portfolio.

I took it as a sign, put a pin in it and decided to revisit at a later date.

This is where things get interesting. By interesting, I mean extremely irritating.

A few days later I attempted to re-list my portfolio.

The import process seemed considerably slower, but whatever. I've seen slower.

When it finished, I received the following partial failure notification:


spacefail.PNG

I thought this was strange considering the entire portfolio was verified, listed and live just a few days prior. Theoretically, nothing should have required verification.

When I started going through the names that failed I discovered that it wasn't just a few names, but rather 1800+ domains that now required verification.

In the very short time the listings had been removed, someone else managed to list over 20% of my portfolio.

Spaceship does not provide a way to export the failed domain listings. view them as a list or even view the notification later.

[X] out of the notification and it's gone with the wind. Never to be seen again.

The only way to reproduce the notification is by importing another csv. Even then, the steps involved in obtaining the data needed to create a list for support to verify is absurdly ridiculous.

I wouldn't care as much about the unauthorized Spaceship listings if they weren't given priority over the Afternic and SedoMLS feeds in the Namecheap path, but they are, so I do.

Any other sales platform would've had the listings removed and issue resolved within minutes.

I just don't understand it.

@Spaceship - This is a problem.

You really need to come of with a better verification solution now, before the platform ends up containing hundreds of thousands of unauthorized listings and unhappy clients due to refunds as a result of anauthorized/fraudulent listings.

Edit: Upon further checking, I discovered they've listed names owned by other investors as well and companies including one who has a moderately sized portfolio...Hugedomains!
 
Last edited:
3
•••
They should round these LTOs on the lander to the nearest whole dollar.


round.png
 
18
•••
They should round these LTOs on the lander to the nearest whole dollar.


Show attachment 286790
It would look better, but then you'll get someone whinging that 20x $1950 doesn't equal $38,999. Personally, I'd keep the cents but make the font (for the cents only) half the size at max. That way, you also keep the advantage of the monthly payment being less than $1,950. Maybe not so important on this one, but if you have a $9,999 LTO over 10mths, the science tells us that it appears cheaper @ $999.90/mo rather than rounded to $1k.
 
5
•••
Even Afternic understood (after awhile) that it looks terrible to show cents and removed them.
 
0
•••
Well the LTO is in effect seller financing and nobody should expect it to be interest-free to the cent.

There are currently separate fields for BIN and Full price (so payments don't have to be interest-free at all), and I often use a suitable higher number to take care of those stupid cents that charm pricing divided by months easily produces.

e.g.
BIN $7888
LTO $658 (12 months = $7896 Full price)
(or I might put $7890 in order to get it to show $789 for 10 months)

Of course the current implementation is tedious and requires too much manual work. There should be more scalable โ€round up to the nearest dollarโ€ automation. At Afternic, $988 BIN, 3 months LTO is $330/mo (=$990 full price, and nobody complains).
 
Last edited:
5
•••
I often use a suitable higher number to take care of those stupid cents

Thank you. That's an interesting, if unscalable, solution in the meantime.
 
0
•••
I have a glitch, by mistake I apply Afternic NS to some domains one of them was listed already at Spaceship, I put back it's NS to Spaceship fast, but today I check and the domain is pointing to Afternic, not sure how this is possible.
Please fix this Spaceship devs, big thanks.
 
1
•••
Am I missing something? I just imported a few domains over to Spaceship and so far so good, apart from how much of a headache it is to navigate to the Seller Hub because it insists on showing you the homepage every single time... but where exactly is Spaceship's marketplace? Is the end-user search for a domain the only equivalent they have to Atom marketplace's searching/browsing/comparing domains? At the moment it seems they have a better interface for navigating their products than they do for navigating domains in their "marketplace".
 
2
•••
@Marina Savina
@Spaceship
@Edward Marukhian

Dear spaceship ,
Please note that when domain indexed at google results as below screenshot, It is not important readers to see only the general sentence of " The simple , safe way to buy domain and the transfer simple and safe and so on ........ " !!!
You are here advertising only spaceship and its services !!!? Thats it ?? What about the domain itself ?? and the price ??

Instead it should be written clearly with bold font as below example : ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡

"" The Domain 123456.com is for sale at spaceship at price $1999 ,
Buy it now / Make Offer / Lease , It is simple and safe way to buy this domain at spaceship ""


This is the right and professional way to show it to readers/browsers .
Please escalate this issue to your customer support / IT / programmers / coders and whomever can do the change and improve .

--------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------

Look screenshot below how things odd and nothing mentioned about domain and price !!
๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡

Show attachment 286739

.

@Marina Savina
@Spaceship
@Edward Marukhian

Below screenshot example of what exactly i mean, when indexed, How should be mentioned about the domain and the price and how to buy .

I start using spaceship lander due to easy indexing and to find better visibility for my domains on google results .
Recently godaddy/afternic start correcting their mistakes by activating indexing and they do it the right way .

Spaceship please do a copy paste exactly/similar of what you see in below screenshots . ๐Ÿ™


1762219517910.png

=====================

Sedo indexing and showing the right details too๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡

1762222404532.png


.
 
Last edited:
2
•••
@Marina Savina
@Spaceship
@Edward Marukhian

Below screenshot example of what exactly i mean, when indexed, How should be mentioned about the domain and the price and how to buy .

I start using spaceship lander due to easy indexing and to find better visibility for my domains on google results .
Recently godaddy/afternic start correcting their mistakes by activating indexing and they do it the right way .

Spaceship please do a copy paste exactly/similar of what you see in below screenshots . ๐Ÿ™


Show attachment 286849
=====================

Sedo indexing and showing the right details too๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡

Show attachment 286851

.
But if you update the price, the old pricing will show for some time...
 
0
•••
But if you update the price, the old pricing will show for some time...

Its ok let it be, But at least to see a proper indexing first that can take the attention of readers ! ๐Ÿ˜

.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Finally!

payout.png
 
6
•••
I just tried to import my domains to BrandStore, Spaceship/Namecheap's new brandable marketplace in beta, but all domains are showing as "needs more details" and no amount of adding prices does anything - there's no save button that I can see, nor a support/help/contact email to get in touch with anyone. Not a great starting experience.

Also one of my names is showing as blocked - at a guess it thinks the domain hack duche.ss has something to do with the word douche, but no definitive reason is given and again, there's no-one to contact to appeal it.
 
Last edited:
2
•••
Spaceship
Domain Recover
CatchDoms
DomainEasy โ€” Payment Flexibility
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the pageโ€™s height.
Back