Dynadot

discuss Showcase and Discuss 6N.com's

Spaceship Spaceship
Watch

S-B

Account Closed
Impact
5,263
With 4n.com and 5n.com prices increase I believe 6n.coms are the next logical step. Because of this, I have invested in this niche and expect to see growth in the coming months.

Anyone else on board?
 
3
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
Just a headsup: my 884848[.]com, which I posted earlier in this thread, received a BIN bid on Afternic for $2,848, now in Escrow. Got that earlier this year for $15.

Best to you!
 
16
•••
557766.com 3,200 NameJet today
 
10
•••
It was a big day for numerics on Go Daddy, 60333.com closed at $13,005 and 615888.com closed at $5,500, that is a nice price for a 6N.com. To keep things moving we had a 7N.com 8888588.com close at $820.

Now the bidding is really interesting on the 7N.com. You will see that there were 3 bidders and the name is at $105, when all of a sudden here comes bidder 4 and he jumps the bid up to $500, so then bidder 4 and bidder 1 go back and forth up to $810, this is all done 3 days before the auction closes. Then out of the blue right at the close bidder 5 comes and bids just $10 more and the auction ends at $820.


Bid Date Bid Expires Bidder Bid Amount
2015/08/08 09:43 AM (PDT) 2015/08/08 09:49 AM (PDT) Bidder 5 $820
Comment:
2015/08/05 11:50 PM (PDT) 2015/08/08 09:49 AM (PDT) Bidder 4 $810
Comment:
2015/08/05 11:47 PM (PDT) 2015/08/08 09:49 AM (PDT) Bidder 1 $800
Comment:
2015/08/05 11:49 PM (PDT) 2015/08/08 09:49 AM (PDT) Bidder 4 $800
Comment:
2015/08/05 11:49 PM (PDT) 2015/08/08 09:49 AM (PDT) Bidder 1 $710
Comment: Automatic Bid
2015/08/05 11:49 PM (PDT) 2015/08/08 09:49 AM (PDT) Bidder 4 $700
Comment:
2015/08/05 11:49 PM (PDT) 2015/08/08 09:49 AM (PDT) Bidder 1 $610
Comment: Automatic Bid
2015/08/05 11:49 PM (PDT) 2015/08/08 09:49 AM (PDT) Bidder 4 $600
Comment:
2015/08/05 11:49 PM (PDT) 2015/08/08 09:49 AM (PDT) Bidder 1 $510
Comment: Automatic Bid
2015/08/05 11:49 PM (PDT) 2015/08/08 09:49 AM (PDT) Bidder 4 $500
Comment:
2015/08/05 11:47 PM (PDT) 2015/08/08 09:49 AM (PDT) Bidder 1 $105
Comment: Automatic Bid
2015/08/03 11:48 AM (PDT) 2015/08/08 09:49 AM (PDT) Bidder 3 $100
Comment:
2015/08/03 11:48 AM (PDT) 2015/08/08 09:49 AM (PDT) Bidder 3 $55
Comment: Automatic Bid
2015/08/03 04:04 AM (PDT) 2015/08/08 09:49 AM (PDT) Bidder 2 $50
Comment:
2015/08/03 11:48 AM (PDT) 2015/08/08 09:49 AM (PDT) Bidder 3 $45
Comment:
2015/08/03 11:47 AM (PDT) 2015/08/08 09:49 AM (PDT) Bidder 2 $40
Comment: Automatic Bid
2015/08/03 11:47 AM (PDT) 2015/08/08 09:49 AM (PDT) Bidder 3 $35
Comment:
2015/08/03 11:47 AM (PDT) 2015/08/08 09:49 AM (PDT) Bidder 2 $27
Comment: Automatic Bid
2015/08/03 11:47 AM (PDT) 2015/08/08 09:49 AM (PDT) Bidder 3 $22
Comment:
2015/08/03 04:04 AM (PDT) 2015/08/08 09:49 AM (PDT) Bidder 2 $17
Comment: Automatic Bid
2015/08/01 08:44 AM (PDT) 2015/08/08 09:49 AM (PDT) Bidder 1 $12
SC8.com closed at $4,361 with 81 bids from 16 bidders. This was a public auction, the domain registered since 1997 had two drops before 97. The .net and .org are registered.

5858.tv closed at $160 on NameJet.

There were a few other 5N.com closes on Go Daddy, 79890.com at $442, 77296.com at $466, 35696.com at $445 and 90581.com at $445. 28982.com closed at $850 on NameJet and 67248.com closed at $176.

NameJet also saw some 5N.net action today, 37733.net closed at $125, 94999.net at $330 and 78788.net at $530.

In other 6N.com action, 988810.com closed at just $17, on Go Daddy odd containing 888 these are getting $30 + on Namepros. Go Daddy also had 818100.com close at $22. The numeric palindrome 962269.com closed at $339 on 4.CN. NameJet saw 873456.com close at $109.
 
9
•••
I just picked up the 105 remaining NNNNNN.coms with a 28 and 38 together and the remaining names with a repeating 28 or 38.

Here's my list:

103828.com
138281.com
153828.com
173828.com
213828.com
238280.com
238281.com
238283.com
238285.com
238287.com
238289.com
253828.com
273828.com
293828.com
338280.com
338285.com
338287.com
338289.com
382801.com
382802.com
382803.com
382805.com
382807.com
382809.com
382812.com
382815.com
382817.com
382819.com
382820.com
382825.com
382827.com
382830.com
382831.com
382832.com
382835.com
382837.com
382839.com
382850.com
382851.com
382852.com
382853.com
382857.com
382859.com
382870.com
382871.com
382872.com
382873.com
382875.com
382879.com
382890.com
382891.com
382892.com
382893.com
382895.com
382897.com
503828.com
523828.com
538280.com
538281.com
538283.com
538287.com
538289.com
573828.com
593828.com
713828.com
723828.com
738280.com
738283.com
738285.com
738289.com
753828.com
793828.com
913828.com
923828.com
238380.com
238381.com
238385.com
238387.com
238389.com
338382.com
338385.com
538380.com
538381.com
538382.com
538387.com
538389.com
738380.com
738381.com
738382.com
738385.com
128283.com
128287.com
228281.com
228287.com
328280.com
328281.com
328285.com
328287.com
528287.com
528289.com
728280.com
728281.com
728283.com
728285.com
728289.com

Anyone have any sales to report?
 
Last edited:
7
•••
I just picked up the 105 remaining NNNNNN.coms

I did the same, but with nnnnn.com's from 2006 onwards.. everyone back then said what a waste ..lol

now holding 100 + of the suckers and sitting very pretty.

Good luck my friend

FX
 
6
•••
6
•••
repeating patterns are the best with these imo

Absolutely.

Yesterday top closes:

948999.com $1,419 NameJet
306777.com $579 NameJet
767111.com $574 NameJet
190555.com $569 NameJet
481999.com $510 NameJet
769988.com $305 Go Daddy
555597.com $303 Go Daddy
331789.com $209 NameJet
603111.com $169 NameJet
666875.com $104 DropCatch
 
6
•••
wow! auction for 238888.com just ended at $17,009
Winner: www22cn-1, I bet is from China (maybe related to 22.cn?)
 
6
•••
666123.com $1,825 yesterday on GoDaddy.
 
6
•••
786687 dot com now my latest addition, grabbed very cheaply (for 1xx) by chance on the spot (buy now) :D
 
Last edited:
6
•••
I think, that it is the good investment in the future, I hope, that you'll to sell for low-mid xxx each...
PS: 2y ago I sold 5N coms for $3 each...
 
5
•••
Hello to All,

nice thread this_username_was_banned
i have these two 6n com's:

282826.com
558588.com


 
5
•••
What do you guys think about my 143 domains?

Typically, "most" buyers of numerics are Chinese. And the Chinese do not like the number 4 in "most" situations. You've put together combinations that are US specific, but I don't personally think there's many US folks looking at the meaning of numerics.

For me, I see them as a virtual investment currency, somewhat in the vein of Bitcoit, but lacking the same liquidity and real time purchase power. And from that perspective, I do try to stay away from both 4's and 5's, sticking to concentrate in the 6, 7, 8 and 9 range... with some 1, 2, and 3's where applicable.

So, IMHO, the likelihood a US buyer looking to use the "I love you" area code combo thing is pretty slim.
 
5
•••
999666.com $10,000 Sedo weekly Sales Report
 
5
•••
393888.com $2,025 Go Daddy Auctions on 6/25. That one had the magic 888, the triple 8, 6 or 9 is the best, the other thing I have noticed in sales patterns, the triple beginning or ending is better than in the middle.

393888 > 398883 for example
 
5
•••
I will hold my 6Ns for a better return. I have 200 of them.
 
5
•••
Big auction today 227888.com already over $5,000 on Go Daddy Auctions.
 
5
•••
5
•••
5
•••
Yeah I sold a 4N net last week to someone in China for $6k. I'm not sure what their game is, but so far I like playing it. ;)
 
5
•••
Hey guys, I sold about 800 of 6n.com, between $85-$450 each. I still have 3600 more of them. My floor for "4" is now $100, min 10 with the "4" in them. My floor for the best one's "88" without"4" is now $1000 each or $500 in bulk if you buy min 10. I don't have to sell, I can hold, but if anybody is interested in seeing my list PM me.

If anybody is selling the worst 6n for under $100 now you are underselling or desperate for cash. Look at Namebio at the comps.
 
5
•••
It's simple domains on the whole with 0/4 in them sell for less overall.

It doesn't even make that much difference where the 0/4 are, although some way at the end is better, but in truth from my tracking of sales I really don't notice much difference.

Had 688856.com or the like sold it would have been a 4 figure sale, although I do agree it was a very nice sale at $888.

You also need to realise that in recent days the value of premium/patterned 6n.coms have been flying to new highs almost daily. Names just weeks ago you could buy for $300-500 you will now need to pay $700-1k+ for them at auction.

Exciting times for 6n.com!
 
5
•••
For sure!

I should add that patterned 6n with 0/4 in them do sell well, and by the day they go for higher prices, such as 88... ones, something like 288003.com etc. type patterns have risen sharply in value as well in recent weeks and days. Despite the recent correction for lower quality with and without 0/4, the premium patterns with and without 0/4 have still risen sharply in that time.

When the whole market overall picks up again, I think the premium patterns will go to new levels altogether from what we're seeing today. However, new highs are happening daily, so you don't need to have a crystal ball to see this happening before your eyes.

Here are just a few examples in recent days:

628699.com - $589
777312.com - $710
518177.com - $896

Here's with 0/4:
375880.com - $300
901122.com - $459
300898.com - $235
299948.com - $259
654188.com - $316
etc.

Just a couple of weeks ago these kind of prices for nice patterns with/without 0/4 would not have happened or even come close IMO.
 
5
•••
Also bought some of 6N.com lately:

277781
277782
277783
277785
688809
288810
288850
566685
755500
511125
533372
711192
833352
911152
911172
933372
833359
833372
933352
122216
250008
200017
717778
900525
722880
772880
288001
288005
288007
288006
288113
735551
367776
577782
657771
199980
105880
107880
108870
206880
207880
208810
208850
508810
508820
508830
508870
608810
608820
581119
608830
608850
256700
733370
 
4
•••
If domains were calories.. i would be morbidly obese. :laugh:
 
4
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back