IT.COM

.mobi September 26th Deadline to Object to New TLDs like .Mobile

Spaceship Spaceship
Watch
Three companies have applied to run registries of a new TLD called .Mobile. A .Mobile extension would easily be confused with .Mobi and if sold to the public would serve the same market. The controlling agency, ICANN, is accepting comments through September 26 (extended from August 12, can someone fix the thread title?).

To post a comment to the review panel:
Go to: https://gtldcomment.icann.org/comments-feedback/applicationcomment/makeacomment
Set up an account. Password must be at least 8 char and include numbers and caps. Click the link in your email within 5 hours. You can change your profile later.

You can comment many times

To comment - log in. The same page shows but scroll down to the comment form that now displays.
In the first box select which applicant you want to object to. For .Mobile they are:
Pixie North, LLC
Dish DBS Corporation -- Select the eighth listing of the 13 Dishes.
Amazon EU S.à r.l. -- Select the second listing of the 4 Amazons.

The second box is now active, click .mobile. If .Mobile does not show (scroll) try another alternative in the first box. This box goes dead when you are slow to finish, reset the first box to fix it.

The third box "Panel/Objection Ground" is important. There are many committees and outside agencies in the review process, if your objection goes to a non-relevant panel it dies. I posted in two categories - Evaluation Panel/String Similarity and Objection Ground/Community. Here is my reasoning:

The String Similarity Evaluation Panel looks at VISUAL similarity. This is an automatic review by an outside judge, .Mobile vs .Mobi is one of the most likely to fail. Public comments are sent officially to the panel.

The Community Objection Ground - The Independent Objector is tasked to file objections on the basis of harm to a community. Mobi domain owners would be harmed by .Mobile. The rules do not allow him to object on string similarity directly. There must be at least one comment from the public on a specific applicant and domain for him to act.

Note that you have to make a separate objection for each applicant/domain set.
Relevant, short, polite, informed comments are preferred.

Pixie North (Donuts) is the only .Mobile applicant that plans to sell domains to the public. Other applications you might object to, among others, are .Mobily .Phone .App.

Public portions of all new TLD applications are here:
http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/application-results/strings-1200utc-13jun12-en

Comment period has been extended to September 26, the anniversary of .Mobi release, by coincidence.

.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
Bump - the deadline to object is tomorrow - Wednesday.
 
0
•••
I've submitted remarks as well. Anyone with an interest in .mobi please submit your comments to ICANN using the OP's detailed instructions. The deadline was extended to September 26, hopefully a mod can update the thread title accordingly.
 
0
•••
Donuts has responded to the String Similarity issue:

II. Confusing similarity
The Applicant Guidebook sets an appropriately high threshold for string confusion:
“String confusion exists where a string so nearly resembles another that it is likely to deceive or cause confusion. For a likelihood of confusion to exist, it must be probable, not merely possible that confusion will arise in the mind of the average, reasonable Internet user. Mere association, in the sense that the string brings another string to mind, is insufficient to find a likelihood of confusion.”
Instances of similar strings exist in the root today: .BIZ and .BZ, or .COM and .CO or .CM, for example. At first glance, association of these strings might suggest similarity, but reporting or evidence that they are visually or meaningfully similar clearly does not exist, and the standard of confusion probability is not met. By these examples, it is clearly difficult to confuse the average, reasonable Internet user.
Broader Internet usage, growth in name space, and specificity in identity and expression are the foundation of the new gTLD program, and are suitable priorities for the community. In the interest of consumer choice and competition, multiple strings and the variety and opportunity they present to users should prevail over all but the near certainty of actual confusion.

https://gtldcomment.icann.org/comments-feedback/applicationcomment/commentdetails/10241
 
0
•••
I am in support


-Arm (Yelo :)
 
0
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back