Blip.tv, Flo.tv, Beet.tv.........It's just a matter of time for .tv.
http://www.reelseo.com/viewership-up-moving-to-tv/12571/
Look around.
JLC
http://www.reelseo.com/viewership-up-moving-to-tv/12571/
Look around.
JLC
Since I have pinpointed only a few niches and paid no more than reg fee, I am able to have a modest yet handsome portfolio of many extensions with more than half being .tv.The tv names cost no more than a bottle of decent bourbon, and unlike the hootch which could go in a short time, the extension is good for a year.
I have sent powerpoint presentations to a few media and sports concerns but got the email addresses from the internet so I do not know how legit or up to date they were. I send emails one at a time, no batches, a few said thanks but not now, will keep on file though for future reference.
It is a common argument, that paeople only paid reg fee, it doesn't mean much though when people own more than a couple fo names, most have significant sums invested. You know yourself though whether it was a profitable move if you've been in the market over a year.
How many bought? That is what counts, not how many made a polite comment when saying no.
I think .TV is like cube steak. It's hard to chew, tough to swallow, and a real b*&ch to digest.![]()
Yes, Patience is a Virtue
// Wish I had more of it.
Only difference is it isn't cheapest choice, in fact it is of the most expensive.
I found some beer....
When you go to the grocery store and browse the meat department, there are many cuts of meat from which to choose. If you don't want to spend the big bucks on fillets (.COM), ribeyes (.NET), or porterhouse (.ORG), you can always buy cube steak.
I think .TV is like cube steak. It's hard to chew, tough to swallow, and a real b*&ch to digest.![]()
sushi ? ..... ha ha very good
If there was a good proportion of success stories there wouldn't be as many naysayers as their is.
I found some beer....
When you go to the grocery store and browse the meat department, there are many cuts of meat from which to choose. If you don't want to spend the big bucks on fillets (.COM), ribeyes (.NET), or porterhouse (.ORG), you can always buy cube steak.
I think .TV is like cube steak. It's hard to chew, tough to swallow, and a real b*&ch to digest.![]()
I found some beer....
When you go to the grocery store and browse the meat department, there are many cuts of meat from which to choose. If you don't want to spend the big bucks on fillets (.COM), ribeyes (.NET), or porterhouse (.ORG), you can always buy cube steak.
I think .TV is like cube steak. It's hard to chew, tough to swallow, and a real b*&ch to digest.![]()
When you go to the grocery store and browse the meat department, there are many cuts of meat from which to choose. If you don't want to spend the big bucks on fillets (.COM), ribeyes (.NET), or porterhouse (.ORG), you can always buy cube steak.
I think .TV is like cube steak. It's hard to chew, tough to swallow, and a real b*&ch to digest.![]()
uhhh, MG, given that she died from anorexia, I'm not sure where you're going with the whole eating food analogy, lol.
Forget the topic i am just here for the comedy :]
I don't have a problem with Microguy & Snoop, if I did in the past, I don't now... what I do have a problem with is simple: If I enjoy going to a particular restaurant (.TV) - while not my favorite one, I like eating there, it's been a great experience OVERALL, not every dish was delicious or satisfying, but many were. Some items on the menu cost more than others, but just because the item was priced higher didn't always guarantee a better dining experience. But, I still love that restaurant and enjoy going there. MG & Snoop have told me that they don't like this restaurant. They've told me why. I understand why they don't like it. But telling me their opinion VERSUS picketing outside the restaurant are 2 totally different things. They spend their time picketing outside and tell everyone going into the restaurant that the food is bad, that there are better options out there, etc. They spend lots of their time going out of their way to spread their message. Snoop even posted recently that he visited another .TV board (full of fans/supporters) to see what was going on. If Microguy and Snoop want to continue picketing... great.
I think a said the other day (to someone who was "offended" by .tv naysaying), .tv is not your mother, it is not your girlfriend...... now we can add that is not your favoutite reasuarant to the list either.
People who bought or decided not to buy into the extension made a business decision based on the hope of making money, and clearly almost all lost money on .tv investments. We are now hearing of people who have lost vast amounts of money, like the guy who admitted losing $500,000 on it. There is no point saying "don't mock .tv because I think it", it has obviously performed badly over a period of many years. It is a bit like saying "don't slam AIG because I like it". Maybe go around and tell stock brokers that they should tell people to sell certain stocks or realesate advisors that they shouldn't say certain areas are bad.
The reason why I will continue naysaying in this space, and the reason I started is a balance against the cheerleaders, make no mistake my aim is to dissuade people from investing in this area, I hate seeing people lose money on investments that have always done badly especially when an area is domainated by cheerleaders (which is what .tv was) who try and censor and repel any attempt to give people the alternate viewpoint.
I think a said the other day (to someone who was "offended" by .tv naysaying), .tv is not your mother, it is not your girlfriend...... now we can add that is not your favoutite reasuarant to the list either.
People who bought or decided not to buy into the extension made a business decision based on the hope of making money, and clearly almost all lost money on .tv investments. We are now hearing of people who have lost vast amounts of money, like the guy who admitted losing $500,000 on it. There is no point saying "don't mock .tv because I think it", it has obviously performed badly over a period of many years. It is a bit like saying "don't slam AIG because I like it". Maybe go around and tell stock brokers that they should tell people to sell certain stocks or realesate advisors that they shouldn't say certain areas are bad.
The reason why I will continue naysaying in this space, and the reason I started is a balance against the cheerleaders, make no mistake my aim is to dissuade people from investing in this area, I hate seeing people lose money on investments that have always done badly especially when an area is domainated by cheerleaders (which is what .tv was) who try and censor and repel any attempt to give people the alternate viewpoint.

