posted by mwzd:
Frank, what does the ad cost you?
Irrelevant, since it makes a profit. I actually went back to my one major slam-dunk campaign -- which is currently in its 168th consecutive week running. It has turned a profit in 154/167 completed weeks, and a net profit every month -- average monthly profit close to 50% of the ad cost. In those three years and change I've tweaked the ad a couple of times, and tweaked the landing page quite a bit.
Now, I will point out again in the interest of honesty that this is a
single and
exceptional campaign. But I have had many others, especially seasonal stuff, services targeted to "newspaper demographics" and the odd controversial bit (anti-Democrat ads in an election cycle tend to do really well in getting offline eyeballs in front of a website.) I also prefaced my experience with online sales with offline and mail order sales, so it could just be my copywriting or demographics jockeying skewing the numbers. But the numbers are almost universally positive, across a broad spectrum of niches and demographs.
Have you tried analysing and targeting the same kind of audience via a cpc method?
Yes -- for "grand slam's" particular niche PPC advertising is a hugely expensive, affiliate-choked nightmare.
When was the last time your ad was cut out and shown by the readers to other people who might be interested?
I would guess close to never, but I would imagine that at some point in the last three years, a few people have mentioned it to a friend or family member, which is a much much much more effective referral than a Facebook share or retweet.
Ever heard of social media reach for print ads?
Nope.
I didn't say it wouldn't work at all, read the last line I wrote in the post.
Fair enough, as are your additional qualifications about promoting an online-only service such as Twitter. But what you said first was, exact words,
Today using offline marketing for any website is all kinds of fail. Incorrect, or at the very least overly broad.
Oh, and I didn't say this, was quoting a world top 10 marketing agency head who was earlier with Yahoo and founded some of the top startups in the world, currently also runs a very successful venture capital firm.
I'm amazed he's gotten as far as he has with that incorrect view of offline promotion. Good on him, though.
TV/Print ads which mention a website are usually for offline products / services, using offline advertising for a purely online offering is, imho, not cost effective at all.
Right, this is a much more specific and more or less believable statement than the original.
I'd like to add: If you're big into advertising concepts, then you are of course familiar with demographic targeting. All the AddThis buttons in the world are lost on someone who is reading print classifieds. A short, effective ad, which directs a reader to a short, grammatically-correct, easy-to-remember domain name, is not -- it is powerfully well-suited to those people, because even if they do not rush to the computer the name and ad will stick with the majority of them.
It is definitely not all kinds of fail, in any event.
Frank