- Impact
- 174
I've seen a lot of people giving the cold shoulder to small names combining both letters and numbers but there are some facts you can't disagree with: they are more "exclusive" then the last craze of 6N.coms or 5L.coms - NNNL.coms are even more exclusive them LLL.coms!
I've run the numbers while I was considering 5L combinations and this was the resulting ranking:
p.s. I'm not sure if there are any NNNL.com available yet...
I've run the numbers while I was considering 5L combinations and this was the resulting ranking:
| N.com(Chinese) | 9 | 123567890 |
| N.com | 10 | 1234567890 |
| L.com(Chinese) | 18 | BCDFGHJKLMNPQRSTXZ |
| L.com | 26 | ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ |
| NN.com(Chinese) | 81 | 9^2 |
| NN.com | 100 | 10^2 |
| LL.com(Chinese) | 324 | 18^2 |
| LL.com | 676 | 26^2 |
| NNN.com(Chinese) | 729 | 9^3 |
| NNN.com | 1.000 | 10^3 |
| LLL.com(Chinese) | 5.832 | 18^3 |
| NNNN.com(Chinese) | 6.561 | 9^4 |
| NNNN.com | 10.000 | 10^4 |
| NNNL.com(Chinese) | 13.851 | (9^3)*18 |
| LLL.com | 17.576 | 26^3 |
| NNLL.com(Chinese) | 26.244 | (9^2)*(18^2) |
| NNNL.com | 27.000 | (10^3)*26 |
| NNNNN.com(Chinese) | 59.049 | 9^5 |
| NNLL.com | 67.600 | (10^2)*(26^2) |
| NNNNN.com | 100.000 | 10^6 |
| LLLL.com(Chinese) | 104.976 | 18^4 |
| LLLL.com | 456.976 | 26^4 |
| NNNNNN.com(Chinese) | 531.441 | 9^6 |
| NNNNNN.com | 1.000.000 | 10^6 |
| LLLLL.com(Chinese) | 1.889.568 | 18^5 |
| NNNNNNN.com(Chinese) | 4.782.969 | 9^7 |
| NNNNNNN.com | 10.000.000 | 10^7 |
| LLLLL.com | 11.881.376 | 26^5 |
p.s. I'm not sure if there are any NNNL.com available yet...















