- Impact
- 110
I am looking a *****.name domain
Every other popular extension as been taken
Is it worthwile to get the .name
Thanx
Iravan
Every other popular extension as been taken
Is it worthwile to get the .name
Thanx
Iravan
I remember hearing the same argument, about 2 years ago, used to explain why people shouldn't reg any .info names. As you can see from my above remarks, .name is no .info. In fact, I only rate it a few rungs above .tk. However, if I had Talk.tk, I would renew it w/ development plans in mind, because I think it has branding potential, despite the unpopularity of the .tk ext.but .name which is the worst point which i said in a point yesterday is its 4 letter domain extention
.names are dumb
No argument there. ws has the "website" association attached and .cc is backed by Verisign. However, there is a considerable amt of cctld territory that lies between ws/cc and tk.IMHO you would most always be better off getting .ws or .cc rather than .name if all the normal gTLD's are taken.
Iravan said:True True
What d oyou think of popular last names
Like
Smith.name??
They are virtually all reserved by the registry for third level domain services.
Grrilla said:It also could be argued that there are keywords that may be better served by .name domains, for branding purposes, ie: ...
Iravan said:So if you find one that isnt reg'd then its valuable
and if it id who would be the main buyer, or buyer group
Childhood.name
Husbands.name
Wifes.name
Spouses.name
Grandmothers.name
Grandfathers.name
SearchFor.name
RegisterA.name
Screenname.name (a bit redundant)
stolen.name