NameSilo

MV Domains (Metaverse) - Showcase and Discuss

SpaceshipSpaceship
Watch

Levi_charlz

Account Closed (Requested)
Impact
2,295
The Metaverse is the next big thing with many of the Big Tech players already involved so thought it deserved a dedicated ‘MV’ thread.

Lots of keywords like Glasses, NFT’s etc are already taken but there are lots still available.

Just picked up ‘MVTokens’ in king

Happy hunting!
 
Last edited:
19
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
GoDaddyGoDaddy
Got these pairs in dot com

Natural // MV
MV // Natural

Physical // MV
MV // Physical

In both cases, I think that Word + MV might be even better than the MV + Word alternative.

What do you guys think?
 
0
•••
Got these pairs in dot com

Natural // MV
MV // Natural

Physical // MV
MV // Physical

In both cases, I think that Word + MV might be even better than the MV + Word alternative.

What do you guys think?
I think investors, that acquire a name out of the interest 'participating at the metaverse',
want customers to see mv right at first sight.

So I think it is still slightly better to have mv at the beginning,
No matter how it else sounds.

But if you have both, that's a nice combo for an investor.
 
2
•••
Last edited:
6
•••
I think investors, that acquire a name out of the interest 'participating at the metaverse',
want customers to see mv right at first sight.

So I think it is still slightly better to have mv at the beginning,
No matter how it else sounds.

But if you have both, that's a nice combo for an investor.
I agree with you but oddly Physical + MV is having around 50% more views than the alternative, and I listed them at the same time.

I think that the keyword is very important to determine which alternation is better.

For example, MV + Glasses is clearly better than Glasses + MV, but in the case of words like Physical/Natural, it's not as clear IMO.
 
3
•••
MVerse.Porn
MVerse.Build
MVerse.Glass
MVerse.Travel
MVerse.Trading
 
2
•••
I agree with you but oddly Physical + MV is having around 50% more views than the alternative, and I listed them at the same time.

I think that the keyword is very important to determine which alternation is better.

For example, MV + Glasses is clearly better than Glasses + MV, but in the case of words like Physical/Natural, it's not as clear IMO.
I registered mv.glass
 
3
•••
.com

 
2
•••
6
•••
6
•••
4
•••
MetaVerse Grand Prix GP (doctor) Group etc!

MV.GP
 
3
•••
1
•••
1
•••
1
•••
Quite strange, because all the names listed in the article (vegas.mv reit.mv index.mv) are available.
At the same time, I have names bots.mv bots.ai .
I never did try to register a .MV name but I remember seeing this in the other metaverse thread. Not sure why this is...

Show attachment 207216
Thank me later

one of the best #dotmv!


The bad thing about .mv is that it shows as available many times. When you pay to register, it kicks back your funds or at best you wait 2 weeks. Wtf is that?!

On another note, your 'bots' names are nice
🙂
 
Last edited:
2
•••
Quite strange, because all the names listed in the article (vegas.mv reit.mv index.mv) are available.
At the same time, I have names bots.mv bots.ai .
Maybe that's due to the obscure process of registration mentioned here by some members, so that the online registry gets updated with a delay?

BTW, as I see the newly established business owners do not care about having the matching .com versions for their names. It's interesting whether they change their mind in the future.
 
2
•••
👀

Screenshot_20220106-113204_Chrome.jpg

Highest offer so far -

Screenshot_20220106-113113_Chrome.jpg
 
Last edited:
12
•••
Quite strange, because all the names listed in the article (vegas.mv reit.mv index.mv) are available.
At the same time, I have names bots.mv bots.ai .
Not available - vegas.mv .........look on marcaria.com, other websites show its available
 
1
•••
.com

 
1
•••
Last edited:
0
•••
Appraise.net

We're social

Spaceship
Domain Recover
CatchDoms
DomainEasy — Zero Commission
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back