- Impact
- 2
lol good...
biggie said:another case of conviction, before trial.
No. He shouldn't. An "immediate death sentence" is in no way appropriate here, and the fact that you would even say something like that is downright appalling.{insert name here} said:biggie said:another case of conviction, before trial.
please read all the info on him before making comments like that.
he should be sentenced to immediate death for his actions
viciouscircle said:No. He shouldn't. An "immediate death sentence" is in no way appropriate here, and the fact that you would even say something like that is downright appalling.
EVERYONE deserves a fair trial before being punished.
He may be guilty, sure. But 'immediate death' for dogfighting? That's a bit drastic don't you think?{insert name here} said:So you don't think hes guilty? have you read everything on this, have you seen the paper trail that proves by itself hes guilty?
I don't care if this is mike vick or tom smith, hes guilty.
SecondVersion said:He may be guilty, sure. But 'immediate death' for dogfighting? That's a bit drastic don't you think?
Oh, yes, I'm all for punishing those cruel to animals.. I love animals, but that 'immediate death' just..erm.. :/Isis said:your right, i think he should be put in the ring with these dogs.... or better yet, have him and all the other sickos out there that get off from this type of brutality battle it out in the 'thunderdome'...
2 men enter, 1 man leave...only to be eaten by rabid dogs...
but seriously, there has to be some sort of jail time for animal cruelty. imo
My statement has nothing to do with if I think he is guilty or not.{insert name here} said:viciouscircle said:No. He shouldn't. An "immediate death sentence" is in no way appropriate here, and the fact that you would even say something like that is downright appalling.
EVERYONE deserves a fair trial before being punished.
So you don't think hes guilty? have you read everything on this, have you seen the paper trail that proves by itself hes guilty?
I don't care if this is mike vick or tom smith, hes guilty.
{insert name here} said:I dont think jail time covers it, if you can just kill an animal like that, you would have no problems killing a person. Eye for an eye, I think he should be beaten to death! hes a low life piece a crap.
.X. said:The thing that most puzzles me about all of this, What is a person that is worth , probably 25 million dollars + , Doing dog fighting for, he is a total fruit cake, imo
But no death sentence is in order here, Be rational, I love animals, and i can see him getting prision time, But not the death penalty.
viciouscircle said:An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.
Again, I'm not trying to discount the crimes (probably) committed.Isis said:viciouscircle said:An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.
which is why injustice to the poor and weak (human or animal) is often over-looked. the way this 'justice' system is set up, he'll plea bargain out of a conviction and most likely pay a fine and do volunteer work...
why is it that sports stars can get away with murder? why is it that many will ignore the damage they cause and run to their defense?
viciouscircle said:Again, I'm not trying to discount the crimes (probably) committed.
My point here is there is a severe inconsistency with the post I was responding to. {insert name here} goes so far as to endorse what amounts to torture ("light it on fire, drown it, stab it, hes a sick mofo and I think he should get the same treatment") and beating Vick to death ("I think he should be beaten to death!"). These kinds of statements are both inflammatory and reactionary.
The punishment should FIT the crime, not BE the crime. Torturing Vick to death wouldn't accomplish anything positive.



