Microsoft To Google: It’s On!

Namecheap AuctionsNamecheap Auctions
Spacemail by SpaceshipSpacemail by Spaceship
SpaceshipSpaceship
Watch

slaughterbeck

Established Member
Impact
110
Microsoft is planning to release an assault on the search advertising industry this coming June, according to the Associated Press. Pulling from the Chinese research leg of the company, the Beast of Redmond aims to add highly targeted and contextual next-generation search marketing technology to its weapons cache to continue its bout against the new nemesis found in Google.


Being in the shadow of another company is certainly not something Microsoft is used to. Sure, Sony gave the software company a proper thumping with PlayStation 2, a hard lesson that propelled an aggressive dropping of Xbox 360 gamer bait in time for Christmas. "In time for the holidays" was a strong left hook to Sony's chin before the tech giant could throw out the monstrously high-tech PlayStation3. Microsoft is hoping an early attack put a crack in Sony's glass jaw.

Microsoft's new plan of action smacks of a similar counterattack strategy. In the search marketing business, it's been a losing battle for second place. Not realizing the early importance of search technology, Gates and company outsourced their afterthought to Yahoo!'s Overture Services. As their share of the search market has gone from bad to worse, dropping by as much as eight percent in recent years, that strategy has proven ineffective.

Though some have speculated a stronger relationship with Yahoo! is forthcoming, the relationship is scheduled to come to genial close in June. It appears that's when MSN will make its push for at least second place, if not able to over come a strong memetic force in Google.

The AP reported that 25 percent of sponsored links come from Microsoft's recent testing of adCenter and that in June that percentage will grow to 100.

Yesterday, Microsoft unveiled its adCenter Incubation Lab, shortened to adLab for the time constrained, a joint-effort between MSN's adCenter and Microsoft Research that has given way to a state-of-the-art laboratory in Beijing. adLab has "a mission to research and incubate advanced technologies for MSN adCenter, designed to provide advertisers with rich targeting capabilities based on audience intelligence information and give consumers a more relevant online experience."

That relevant online experience includes advertising across several platforms from blogs to search to video all aimed at targeting a precise audience. Microsoft demonstrated some of these technologies at their recent adCenter Demo Fest.

" These prototypes hold the promise to change online advertising dramatically in areas such as paid search, behavioral targeting and contextual advertising. Also shown were projects addressing areas of incubation in their earliest stages of investigation, such as ad bar-code readers, social network mining, and video and large-display ads," said Microsoft in a statement.

The adLab team in Beijing consists of letters-after-their-names scientists with specializations in data mining, information retrieval, statistical analysis, artificial intelligence, auction theory, visual computing and digital media.

One of the more interesting highlights of the adLab was the discussion of video hyperlink ads that detect products shown on TV and allow an instant referral to information about the product.

So basically, as Mike Meyers is making fun of product placement in Wayne's World, a Doritos hyperlink could appear in future syndicated showings, taking would-be customers to information pages as well as where Doritos can be bought.

"The exciting work being shown at adCenter Demo Fest and the new Microsoft adLab reflects Microsoft's commitment to innovation in the field of ad products," said Tarek Najm, general manager of adCenter at Microsoft.

"The Microsoft team of top researchers in this field is unsurpassed and certain to produce compelling advances that will impact and ultimately change the game in online advertising."

And if they can make good on those promises, the game just might be changed.
Web Pro News
 
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
GoDaddyGoDaddy
I never saw the days when you could buy an off the shelf PC without paying for Microsoft preinstalled on it. If I did, i'd probably have the same sadistic attitude towards Windows that the older folks do. Nor do I remember a time before IE, and i'm still in the habit of using that too.

Microsoft is just digging itself a deeper hole for it's brand name and perception by copying it's competitors products. I personally would love to see Sergey Brin & Larry Page double team Bill Gates! Rock on Google.
 
0
•••
Shorty said:
I personally would love to see Sergey Brin & Larry Page double team Bill Gates! Rock on Google.

And eventually people will say the same about Google - it's already starting in some communities.

People are realising that Google and Microsoft have the same goal in the end. Profit.
 
0
•••
oliciv said:
And eventually people will say the same about Google - it's already starting in some communities.

People are realising that Google and Microsoft have the same goal in the end. Profit.
*cough* How many free Micro$oft products do you see ... percentage-wise. Now compare it to Google. Percentage-wise. *cough*

(percentage-wise as that makes a fair comparison according to their sizes)
 
0
•••
The first editor I used was wordstar, then I used wordmark, wordperfect.
Microsoft killed all those alternatives and become monoply. In this condition
you don't have much choice (even though in theory you do have the choice).

oliciv said:
But unlike taxes, people can choose not to use Windows.

However, they don't because there is no better OS for the desktop.
 
0
•••
*grabs popcorn*

this will be a good one to watch =)
 
0
•••
maybe microsoft would like to develope a semi competant search engine before they jump into the world of contextual ads, now theres a thought!
 
0
•••
compuXP said:
*cough* How many free Micro$oft products do you see ... percentage-wise. Now compare it to Google. Percentage-wise. *cough*

(percentage-wise as that makes a fair comparison according to their sizes)

Offering free services to the end user has nothing to do with profit, I'm not seeing your point

cache said:
The first editor I used was wordstar, then I used wordmark, wordperfect.
Microsoft killed all those alternatives and become monoply. In this condition
you don't have much choice (even though in theory you do have the choice).

They killed off the competition because they were better. You don't just become a monopoly overnight, people have to actually choose to use your products first.
 
0
•••
I'm glad Microsoft is jumping in this just means more alternative's for everybody :) Now Google, Yahoo, & MS all offering Text-ad publishing.
 
0
•••
Google started out with 2 uni kids who wanted to gather information. Microsoft started out with 1 uni kid who wanted to make some dosh. 'nuff said?

Google is hardly about profit. Look at the googleplex. Look at the managerial utility they give, the rewards for working for them. Microsoft's guys are locked in grey cubicles. Which one is the monster? :)
 
0
•••
Shorty said:
Google started out with 2 uni kids who wanted to gather information. Microsoft started out with 1 uni kid who wanted to make some dosh. 'nuff said?

Google is hardly about profit. Look at the googleplex. Look at the managerial utility they give, the rewards for working for them. Microsoft's guys are locked in grey cubicles. Which one is the monster? :)

Neither are monsters, they are both successful companies, and are both interested in making a profit.

One of the reasons Google is so successful is that they are seen as the "good guy" - a lot of people see Google just as a search engine and don't realise how they even make money...
 
0
•••
I hate Google. As far as i'm concerned Google are the corporate monster. It might sound petty but AdSense will only cancel your account until it's payment time, and then they keep all the money. If Microsoft wanted more money they would have introduced advertising a long time ago.

I really hope Microsoft can get something good going. I'm already starting to use MSN more and more, and Google less and less.
 
0
•••
Also I dont see google offering all of these:
News & Sports
News
Slate Magazine
Sports by FOX Sports
Video
Weather
Look it Up
City Guides
Encarta
Maps & Directions
White Pages
Yellow Pages
Living & Finances
Autos
Careers & Jobs
Dating & Personals
Health & Fitness
Lifestyle
Money
Real Estate
Travel
Entertainment
Games
Horoscopes
Movies
Music
TV
Shop
Air Tickets
Autos - New and Used
Buy a House
Rent an Apartment
Shopping
Technology
Downloads
Microsoft.com
Microsoft Update
Tech & Gadgets
People
Greeting Cards
Groups & Chat
Kids
Latino
MSN Directory
MSN Worldwide

Google imo are making a few bad decisions. Most of their projects are in beta, I would rather they finished their current projects before starting yet another. Google are just trying to gain a large market share and not for their good, for Google's good.

Microsoft are being forced to change a few things, one of these being adding a lot of space to email accounts and now creating a new name with live.com

I personally use both daily and both do their job just fine. I do not need an extra 2gigs of space on my email and I do not need a whole lot more features to my OS or MSN.
 
0
•••
cache said:
Microsoft never failed, not that I like microsoft.
And this is where they go wrong. I think that companies (especially as big as Microsoft) are allowed to have some degree of arrogance, but until now, I think they just expected people to use them. They were there first, and they did have a strong position, but now Google is getting bigger, and Microsoft are only just stepping in against them. Don't get me wrong, Microsoft is great - I love them, but I like Google a lot more, and this is why Google are so big I think. Google have come in very late with a few things, eg: email. MSN/Hotmail had a mass following, but Google is extremely good with their marketing, or something because everyone suddenly swarmed to their service, even though it is still in BETA testing and not "open" to the public (although it is extremely easy to get an adress). Gtalk was a flop, but I am aware of a lot of people who still use it, etc. They seem to have a "presence" that Microsoft don't. I want to see Microsoft do well, but they need to be quicker, and need to "invent" their own stuff instead of following competitiors. They are a big enough company, they really need to focus more on their web presence.

I don't like that awful "crammed full" page, like Microsoft and YAhoo have. I like the simple Google style, and I feel I trust Google more. That said, if Microsoft "split" MSN from Microsoft (not demerge, but detach it more from the primary company) I might start to use them more, and would definitely use their content orientated ads. They are the bigger company and would definitely be able to run a much larger, better, more powerful ads system.

JRayers said:
I hate Google. As far as i'm concerned Google are the corporate monster. It might sound petty but AdSense will only cancel your account until it's payment time, and then they keep all the money. If Microsoft wanted more money they would have introduced advertising a long time ago.
Its not about money (well... ok the underlying reason is money) but I think that Microsoft just want to be the market leaders in everything. I think it is more presence, and power that is at the forefront of their minds. I think that Microsoft are just following everyone else, and just beating them at everything, although their new search engine is really not as good as Google. I would love to see them do well, but I can't see that happening if they are just exactlly the same as other search engines. ie: MSN = Yahoo! & Google. If they want to become the leaders, they need to be ingenuitive and find something that will make them unique.

I really hope Microsoft can get something good going. I'm already starting to use MSN more and more, and Google less and less.
As I have said above, MSN needs to split more from Microsoft. The websites look the same(ish), and they don't seem to be seperate identies, just seperate names. I think MSN is too proud to be Microsoft. They need to focus on it more.
 
0
•••
Google imo are making a few bad decisions. Most of their projects are in beta,

I do not need an extra 2gigs of space on my email

Google are really good at marketing their products, they tag the beta label on a product and everyone wants to be the first to try it, set up an invite system and everyone wants one.

And then on top of that, if their product breaks and you lose all your data- it was beta - not their fault.

It's win win for them.

Of course, if Microsoft tried the same thing people would just moan about them releasing incomplete software :(
 
0
•••
oliciv said:
Of course, if Microsoft tried the same thing people would just moan about them releasing incomplete software :(

I currently own a copy of "Microsoft Anti-Spyware Beta 1"
 
0
•••
I still prefer my PC for gaming purposes.
Because I cant find solitaire, minesweeper and hearts on PS or XB
 
0
•••
Shorty said:
Google is hardly about profit.

I disagree. Google is a profit monster!
 
0
•••
Google should lose the Don’t be Evil slogan. Power is indeed corruptive.
 
0
•••
Google answer to their shareholders, its not really a question of whos evil.
 
0
•••
Why do people hate Microsoft so much? It usually tends to be kids without much sense.

Microsofts products have changed so much, so they have a few bugs? if you had such a large userbase as microsoft of course theres going to malicous attacks.

Give it a rest guys, hating Microsoft isnt cool, its immature and old news.
 
0
•••
CatchedCatched

We're social

Escrow.com
Spaceship
Escrowly
CryptoExchange.com
Domain Recover
Catchy
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back