Dynadot โ€” .com Transfer

LiveTV Free Internet Television - Design?

Spacemail by SpaceshipSpacemail by Spaceship
Watch
Status
Not open for further replies.

dkr

Respect My Authority!VIP Member
Impact
43
Hi,

I'm thinking of getting a new design for my site, http://www.livetv.ws. What do you guys think? Should I go ahead and have a more.. colorful one made, or is the current one good?

Comments and suggestions are highly appreciated :)

Thank You,
Donny
 
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
AfternicAfternic
I actually like the one that you have now. No changes needed on the template. The content could use some enhancements though. A preview window of any random channel should be on the front page. Channel should be muted, but there should definitely be a bit more action that's relating to your content.

Other than that, i like what you've created.

IB
 
0
•••
Great idea. Do you think I should have a general recorded version of a channel on the front page (to prevent slow streaming), or have a live working one?

Thank You,
Donny
 
0
•••
kinkarso said:
Great idea. Do you think I should have a general recorded version of a channel on the front page (to prevent slow streaming), or have a live working one?

Thank You,
Donny

If you're streaming flash, you could go live. If it's any other format that comes in larger block sizes you may encounter too much buffering, which is a major turn off. Way your technical options there, they will guide you towards the best solution.

IB
 
0
•••
Alright, I need your opinion :). Which one do you think would work better? The content area with a white background and black text, or as is on the LiveTV.ws website?

White background & black text: http://www.livetv.ws/test.jpg
Black background & white text: http://www.livetv.ws

Very much appreciated :).

Thank You,
Donny
 
0
•••
Status
Not open for further replies.
Appraise.net
Domain Recover
DomainEasy โ€” Payment Flexibility
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the pageโ€™s height.
Back