.mobi iPhones.mobi Ideas?

[Morgan]

Hey im looking for ideas in ways i can develop this domain. If you have suggestions for what i should do please feel free to post here. Also are there anyways to generate revenue via .mobi domains yet?

Thanks

 

[Jeff]

If iPhone was a ™ issue, then I'm afraid it'll likely be an issue here, as well! :imho:

Best of Luck.
-Jeff

 

[thinking1]

If iPhone was a ™ issue, then I'm afraid it'll likely be an issue here, as well! :imho:

Best of Luck.
-Jeff

Not if the website is called Internet Phones, or Interactive Phones and is truely not related to the apple iphone at all.

 

[yoyosean]

will be interested to see if they try to come after you - apple that is assuming they close a dea with cisco.

 

[RegisterRants]

Its Cisco that will come after you. I have heard that they are relentless...good luck with that.

 

[vincenzo]

IMHO in this case I cannot see why either Cisco or Apple, or anyone else would have any rights to come after you.

They all had the opportunity to register their TM names before the landrush.

Any large corporation that does not manage and protect their trademarks, especially when given ample notice and priority at comparitively low cost, then by default this should mean they were not interested.

I know they can't register ALL the variations, but they didn't even bother with the main name itself: iphone.mobi

Domain ID D533607-MOBI
Domain Name:IPHONE.MOBI
Created On:17-Oct-2006 18:04:05 UTC
Last Updated On:17-Dec-2006 05:06:11 UTC
Expiration Date:17-Oct-2008 18:04:05 UTC
Sponsoring Registrar:Key-Systems GmbH (269)
Created by Registrar:Key-Systems GmbH (269)
Last Updated by Registrar:Key-Systems GmbH (269)
Status:OK
Registrant ID:P-500883
Registrant Name:Sa Tu
Registrant Organization:SaTu
Registrant Street1:51, MG Road
Registrant City:Raipur
Registrant State/Province:-
Registrant Postal Code:492001
Registrant Country:IN
Registrant Phone:+91.7712443366
Registrant FAX:+91.7712443366
Registrant Email:sax.tus @ gmail .com

That's why I say the above, otherwise totally opposite stance on this.

There really is no excuse nowadays.

- Vince

 

[RegisterRants]

Not for a while at least. They still are fighting Apple...

There is nothing to fight in regard to who owns the trademark...its Cisco's. They filed it first, and that's it. The debate is over Apple's use of it.