Queen = Pronounceable VCVC
Jack = Very strong non-CVCV/VCVC
imho
For .net, I think it's best to think of future endusers... Most Web 2.0 startups can easily afford the dotcom (if it's for sale). IMHO, CVCV/VCVC will make less of a difference in .net long term than we see in dotcom. Long term, I'd expect quality VCVC.nets to be worth considerably more than wannabe-CVCVs.
Too much emphasis is placed on labelling LLLL's imho. You can give a min value for a particular type of LLLL pretty easily, but it's impossible to put a max price on anything, really.
FOOM.com was a great example of an LLLL.com which doesn't follow the typical CVCV/VCVC stereotype, yet sold for far more than the large majority of those even fetch. That still doesn't mean we can expect more for our CVVCs, just that certain extremely high quality CVVCs may fetch very high value. The "oom" ending pattern is particularly desirable in this case and many 4 letter words come to mind instantly following this pattern -- doom, room, zoom, etc.
Same goes for VVVV, triple letter, double premium, or any LLLL.com, really.
bobdigital said:
Would non pronounceable CVCV be second, followed by VCVC?
Are pronounceable VCVC.net's more valuable than crappy CVCV.net's?
does anyone have a ranking I can look at?
Where do pronounceable cvcc fit into this?
or rare VVVV ?
Thanks for looking and contributing.