NameSilo

.tv Has the .tv market peaked?

SpaceshipSpaceship
Watch

Has the .tv market peaked?

  • This poll is still running and the standings may change.
  • Yes

    24 
    votes
    30.0%
  • No

    51 
    votes
    63.7%
  • Unsure

    votes
    6.3%
  • This poll is still running and the standings may change.

snoop

VIP Member
Impact
148
I think we are seeing numerous signs to suggest the .tv may have peaked. From what I can see of it, it is fairly common for relaunched/new tlds prices peak to at the time of the major auction, when speculator interest is at its highest, and you have a whole lot of people in the market who wouldn’t normally dabble in it. I’m not sure .tv will be an exception to this rule.

The only thing to change is there is now a large number of names in the market with genuine, real value, much like other extensions. In other words it is now on a level playfield in that respect but it is still only that, "level", not tilted upwards. The exuberance has carried over into a lot of unrealistic viewpoints recently in my view,

eg

-People claim this market is just starting to warm up and will be much stronger in a year. (we’ve heard that before)
-The idea that many of these premiums will be developed (of course that will never happen and is setting the scene for later disappointment).
-People talking about “trying to keep the momentum going” and trying to organize group auctions (as though this is an engine that constantly needs top ups of fuel to prevent breakdown).
-People talking about future .tv millionaires.
-World economies seeing another shock spreading out from Europe.


If you look back a month ago that really was a market with a lot of positive elements rolled into, many factors combining that may never be repeated.

So I put this question out there, do you think the .tv market has peaked?
 
Last edited:
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
AfternicAfternic
0
•••
...
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Anyways, regarding the thread topic... has .tv peaked, etc...

No, not in my opinion. Previous year was slow, no doubt, but it has picked up nicely.. has it actually peaked though? ... Nope.

RL
 
0
•••
How is nameboy.com an example of a prime generic domain? It is probably a $100 name aside from the fact it has been developed since.
 
0
•••
...
 
Last edited:
0
•••
I honestly believe in the sense of internet/TV the .TV extension will be the new .com...

I sense that the .TV will be the new .NET and .CO to be the new .COM
 
0
•••
you challenged me on whether i was telling the truth about being a dropcatcher in 1999, not on whether i have a head for names that are valuable.

Let me refresh you memory about what you actually claimed,

Originally Posted by finster View Post
thats the same sort of timeline i had in mind when i bought my 1st .com's back when guys like you were dishing out the same brand of short sighted "advice" and there was well under 100 guys trying to catch netsol drops. a lot of great names, ones selling for xxx,xxx now were sold for xx back then.

So now you are telling us after nearly a year of debate that in reality you didn't pick up anything particularly valuable? (don't worry the answer to that was always obvious given you wouldn't disclose a single name).
 
0
•••
I sense that the .TV will be the new .NET and .CO to be the new .COM

I think that .co will be great for typos and that's about it really, just like .cm. Nothing will overcome .com, however .tv will continue to grow, possibly overtaking some other extensions in the process. It has great potential, and once Verisign erases premium pricing once and for all, .tv has nowhere to go but UP!

RL
 
0
•••
I think that .co will be great for typos and that's about it really, just like .cm. Nothing will overcome .com, however .tv will continue to grow, possibly overtaking some other extensions in the process. It has great potential, and once Verisign erases premium pricing once and for all, .tv has nowhere to go but UP!

RL

Yes but... it doesn't matter if it's a typo of .com

I think it will take some time for this TLD to settle and though I don't think there's any reason to think it will revolutionize the internet like the advertisement says I do think it will get decent support from the business/commerce segment. I think it will surpass .org and probably .net's but I'm not so sure about it surpassing .com. You might want to wait to pre-register since is a bit expensive now. However pre registry is selling quite well right now. I myself have pre-registered a few domains, some priority ($300 each). No risk, no return.

Company, corporation was the first thing I thought when I saw it

MAY.CO since 1877

mayco_2.jpg


ACME CO.

94812145_3edd10700b.jpg


Here's a little insider tip. .co WILL become extremely popular. Demand is higher then you know.

If your desired .com domain name is taken and the owner is asking 6 figures for it, you can get the .co for 2 figures !

You save 6 figures for the letter M !

It's a second chance.

.CM on the other hand MEANS NOTHING.

As for .TV, it's all about the future of television and it only targets the entertainment industry.

I think .TV be the 2nd most demanded ccTLD on the planet.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
...
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Yes but... it doesn't matter if it's a typo of .com

I think it will take some time for this TLD to settle and though I don't think there's any reason to think it will revolutionize the internet like the advertisement says I do think it will get decent support from the business/commerce segment. I think it will surpass .org and probably .net's but I'm not so sure about it surpassing .com. You might want to wait to pre-register since is a bit expensive now. However pre registry is selling quite well right now. I myself have pre-registered a few domains, some priority ($300 each). No risk, no return.

Company, corporation was the first thing I thought when I saw it

MAY.CO since 1877

ACME CO.

Here's a little insider tip. .co WILL become extremely popular. Demand is higher then you know.

If your desired .com domain name is taken and the owner is asking 6 figures for it, you can get the .co for 2 figures !

You save 6 figures for the letter M !

It's a second chance.

I understand what you're saying, and as a domainer, I'll nab a few here and there... just don't see it really gaining that much momentum. Its application for companies and corps is excellent no doubt. Its one of the better extensions to come out in a while.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
...
 
Last edited:
0
•••
strictly typo.

If it's a typo, then what is this .co.uk .co.jp .co.ru .co.cn ect... all about ?

Just decoration ?

or the real abbreviation of the word "company" ?

.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
...
 
Last edited:
0
•••
opportunities for typos in .co, naturally.

spend your money anyway you see fit.

When i get my .CO, I'm going to redirect it to my .TV anyways since my website is about cartoons & animation... and little to do with company & corporation it makes sense to have the .TV as my main extension anyways.

It's better to have both, just in case one day i open an animation studio and call it "cartoon corp".
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Deb,
It must have been a killer sale since it was Dan Parisi, who owns WhiteHouse.com. Can you give us some clues? 5 figures, 6 figures? Wait a second, could this have been the $50,000 sale?!?


deb said:
Eq, RJ can confirm its not for publication but sent him escrow details....you guys are close

so We will claim US$50,000 to kick off the .TV year for a high quality political domain @ 24.95 renewal...

Good Luck All Opportunity Knocks at the .TV door

Best,
A

Its just starting, its really, really exciting what is coming for .TV investors... you will see good sales over the next 24 months at a wholesale level...serious offers coming from institutional .com investors :imho:

Any guesses what we sold whitehouse.tv for last year? jeff?
 
Last edited:
0
•••
.TV wont overtake .com but it May overtake .net an .org etc :tu:


Agree, .tv is a good alternative to .com.
 
1
•••
In my view the .tv market has peaked (more or less). After 10+ years of stagnation it is clear that the end users have more viable alternatives available to them in the form of regulated extensions like .com or mature, professionally run and predictable ccTLDs.
They have little incentive to expose their business to the whims of Verisign and their shareholders :imho:

Right now the .tv registry is a cash cow for Verisign but knows what happens when the contract comes to an end.
The terms for registrants could change completely. Verisign is in the business to make money, not to foster the well-being of domain speculators or even further the cause of the .tv TLD or the nation of Tuvalu.
I'd rather invest in Verisign stocks than .tv. IMO that's much less speculative.

Let's consider the fate of legacy premium pricing holders: they have already been screwed not once, not twice but thrice.
The first time was when they fell into the premium pricing trap.
The second time was when they kept on renewing the names.
The third time was when Verisign refused to grandfather their hefty registration fees.
Now they are bound to be had for the fourth time if they continue to play the game.

.tv is not a good market because of the lack of long-term vision and predictability (that other major extensions enjoy) and markets don't like the uncertainty.
 
0
•••
I do not believe .tv has peaked in terms of sales. I do not believe it will ever by like any other extension but as was mentioned above it will surpass .com for video centric sites.

I think there will always be (and should be) a surplus of dictionary .tv's available since 90% of dictionary should not be registered imo unless there is a branding aspect or something that lends it to being good for a video centric channel.

The main question that needs to be asked is "Has Online Video Peaked?". That is the real question and the answer to that one is no, it hasn't. Each day more and more videos are being created, viewed and shared online and this will only continue to grow. As online video continues to grow so will the use for .tv as an extension and so will the need for quality .tv names.

When I think .com I don't think of video or of it being a video centric site. When I hear .tv it is exactly what I expect. You can't really compare .com to .tv since they are made for different purposes.

For example: I own coffee.tv. Would I rather have coffee.com? Of course I would, but as an entrepreneur the type of site I would create for the .com would not be what I would develop for the .tv.

From a domainer perspective I would urge speculators not to reg every name they think sounds good, cool or brandable. Just because it is taken in other extensions does not mean it should be reged in .tv.

When I look at the .tv expired files I am always shocked at how many thousands of .tv names are expiring that I would never have reged and can't imagine what people were thinking when they did reg them.

The value of good .tv names will continue to rise and you will continue to see .tv names selling in the $x,xxx range to $xx,xxx range over the coming year. So no it has not reached it's peak and probably won't for several years to come.
 
0
•••
- Television, animation, entertainment was the first thing I thought when I saw .TV in 2001.
- It only targets the entertainment industry.
- When i see a .COM, to me is like a guess box.
- This is the reason why i would redirect my .CO to my .TV

But i believe .CO will lead the domain industry.

- Company, corporation was the first thing I thought when I saw .CO on April 1st.
- It targets EVERYTHING !!!
- Just like .COM it will become the new guest box.
- Someday they will be selling .CO on the same price level as .COM
- That day would be REVOLUTIONARY.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Appraise.net

We're social

Spaceship
Domain Recover
DomainEasy — Zero Commission
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back