Google Web 2.0 Design!

[sorpeman]

Hi Friends…

I am here presenting you my Concept of Google.com Web 2.0 Design … as you know that Web 2.0 Designing is very very inn nowadays and everyone is now running behind Web 2.0 look…

I i though why not to see how Google will look if we give a SIMPLE revamp to Google page… so i just finished the design… you can see the design at

http://www.FireworksCafe.com/google

and off course i designed the whole layout and graphics in Fireworks 9 (i am testing it these days)

Please post a commenthttp://www.fireworkscafe.com that how much you liked it.

Regards,

 

[Hitch]

First off, this is not a Web 2.0 design.

Web 2.0 designs do not exist, there is no such thing, wanna know why? Because "Web 2.0" is to do with User interaction, AJAX, Intergration etc...

Most of the modern designs these days, do look similar, and Web 2 sites are modern right...?
So, they all tend to use the similar designs, but it doesn't make a design "Web 2.0".

EDIT: Your design does look pritty good however. :tu:
It's just the search bar that lets it down.

 

[shockie]

nice design you've got there, but simply skinning the google page doesnt make it web 2.0... lol

 

[sorpeman]

nice design you've got there, but simply skinning the google page doesnt make it web 2.0... lol

Yup... right...

but as i said DESIGN 2.0 ... no functionality too

its a web 2.0 skinn you can say

 

[nmr86]

nice one !

 

[Matthew.]

First off, this is not a Web 2.0 design.

Web 2.0 designs do not exist, there is no such thing, wanna know why? Because "Web 2.0" is to do with User interaction, AJAX, Intergration etc...

Ahh you've hit a sore patch I always rant a little bit about this.

"2.0" is not about the languages or technology, it is about how it is used.

Ajax is the obvious, a long with using CSS instead of tables (where appropriate ), add in to that accessibility, matching the user needs (design), increased user interaction and a decent amount of trend following and we have your so called "2.0".

I can't agree that a good portion of what is seen as 2.0 is not about design, because it is lol. "2.0" designs have increased accessibility standards and work more towards the user (and to an extent browser) needs than to just looking pretty.

Anywho...i don't like the "2.0" google design that much, it's too bulky and complicated (even for a design that is 70% white space)

I prefer this version:
http://www.andyrutledge.com/google-redux.php

p.s. Did anyone notice what the real google did to image search last night?

 

[sorpeman]

Ahh you've hit a sore patch I always rant a little bit about this.

"2.0" is not about the languages or technology, it is about how it is used.

Ajax is the obvious, a long with using CSS instead of tables (where appropriate ), add in to that accessibility, matching the user needs (design), increased user interaction and a decent amount of trend following and we have your so called "2.0".

I can't agree that a good portion of what is seen as 2.0 is not about design, because it is lol. "2.0" designs have increased accessibility standards and work more towards the user (and to an extent browser) needs than to just looking pretty.

Anywho...i don't like the "2.0" google design that much, it's too bulky and complicated (even for a design that is 70% white space)

I prefer this version:
http://www.andyrutledge.com/google-redux.php

And i dont like this design!

p.s. Did anyone notice what the real google did to image search last night?

what they did?

 

[Matthew.]

what they did?

Try searching for an image, there is now a roll over effect. (blue background and image information appears).

Hate it personally.

 

[-Rasmus-]

p.s. Did anyone notice what the real google did to image search last night?

Yep and it's pretty cool. Looks like a photo gallery.

 

[Matthew.]

Yep and it's pretty cool. Looks like a photo gallery.

Really? Going slightly offtopic here so forgive me but i can't stand it lol, I don't see why it's needed and it just gets on my nerves. The fact that it highlights is bad enough for me but why do i now have to mouse over every image to see the dimensions and url etc? :td:

sorpeman, maybe you could redesign the image search? :hehe:

 

[Albino]

I dont mind the new google image search, looks ok.

I dont like the reskin of the good though mate, the search bar really does let it down.

I also hate the term web 2.0, I can understand where it is coming from, but it really does grate on me

 

[labrocca]

First off, this is not a Web 2.0 design.

Web 2.0 designs do not exist, there is no such thing, wanna know why? Because "Web 2.0" is to do with User interaction, AJAX, Intergration etc...

http://www.modernlifeisrubbish.co.uk/article/web-2.0-colour-palette

As you can see by doing any google search for web 2.0 color palette that you will get a lot of results. There is such a thing as a 2.0 design because it requires certain techniques just like web 2.0 requires certain backend techniques like Ajax. It's not a new web...it's the implementation of a new presentation which includes design.

Sorry to be the one to tell you that you're wrong.

 

[guames]

http://www.andyrutledge.com/googleredux_example.html
It's cool but isn't Google know for the white and I think that they even patented the white spaces (not sure)...

Ahh you've hit a sore patch I always rant a little bit about this.

"2.0" is not about the languages or technology, it is about how it is used.

Ajax is the obvious, a long with using CSS instead of tables (where appropriate ), add in to that accessibility, matching the user needs (design), increased user interaction and a decent amount of trend following and we have your so called "2.0".

I can't agree that a good portion of what is seen as 2.0 is not about design, because it is lol. "2.0" designs have increased accessibility standards and work more towards the user (and to an extent browser) needs than to just looking pretty.

Anywho...i don't like the "2.0" google design that much, it's too bulky and complicated (even for a design that is 70% white space)

I prefer this version:
http://www.andyrutledge.com/google-redux.php

p.s. Did anyone notice what the real google did to image search last night?

 

[NeeJam]

i dont want to repeat everyone but thats definatley not web 2.0 and google has grown by its simplicity, but its quite a nice design

 

[Hitch]

First off, this is not a Web 2.0 design.

Web 2.0 designs do not exist, there is no such thing, wanna know why? Because "Web 2.0" is to do with User interaction, AJAX, Intergration etc...

http://www.modernlifeisrubbish.co.uk/article/web-2.0-colour-palette

As you can see by doing any google search for web 2.0 color palette that you will get a lot of results. There is such a thing as a 2.0 design because it requires certain techniques just like web 2.0 requires certain backend techniques like Ajax. It's not a new web...it's the implementation of a new presentation which includes design.

Sorry to be the one to tell you that you're wrong.

LOOL!

Look around the 'net.
You will find hundreds of posts/articles flaming Web2 designs and palletes.

Things such as that get flamed, and Dugg down on Digg.

Do you really, i mean really, know, anything about Web 2?
It was a term by Reilly.
He was he the one "come up" with the term, he had no intentions for it to be related to design, what so ever.

So, you, are 100% incorrect.

sorpeman, sorry for this thread going rather off topic, let me know if you do want some posts cleaning up.

Adrian

 

[sorpeman]

LOOL!

Look around the 'net.
You will find hundreds of posts/articles flaming Web2 designs and palletes.

Things such as that get flamed, and Dugg down on Digg.

Do you really, i mean really, know, anything about Web 2?
It was a term by Reilly.
He was he the one "come up" with the term, he had no intentions for it to be related to design, what so ever.

So, you, are 100% incorrect.

sorpeman, sorry for this thread going rather off topic, let me know if you do want some posts cleaning up.

Adrian

no, its ok Thanks

 

[jnadel]

nice design.

 

[koolg]

is that your personal website? or just a logo for google?

 

[sorpeman]

Koolg... its my personal site and also just a concept of 2.0 design

 

[jackieloo]

i agree, there's no such thing as web 2.0 design. it is common that those shiny designs are associated to websites that implements 2.0 functionalities. sorpeman, nice work.