Google Page Rank Algorithm - Don't Miss

[rishimodi]

Hi Guys,

Here is a Google Page Rank Algorithm.

Fore Serious SEO, the knowledge is critical.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PageRank#Simplified_PageRank_algorithm

Regards

 

[MutoGen]

Thanks for info. But as far as I know google PR algorithm nobody know.

 

[rishimodi]

Thats what I always thought. I would've not trusted, but when resourse is wikipedia, I checked and really made lot of sense to me.

 

[MutoGen]

Some years ago i tried to learn google PR algoritm. I had a lot of info like big book. But realy it got me nothing.

 

[markhanrry]

I cannot understand the formulas.
And I am counfused to see this.
So Please explain me.

 

[Sabre]

Complex, but makes sense.

Took me a couple of seconds to get my head round it :D

 

[rishimodi]

If you get this Page Rank is no more a mistery for you.

 

[ennui]

risimodi, what's new about it? the problem is that you need traffic and you can get traffic by taking the first position in CERP, and this position is defined not only by your PR, but rather a number of factors, even the reputation of your hoster, lol, the quality of sites on your server. And now where's the factor of links "quality", which is believed to be more important than the question of "quantity" today?
I just mean that's just a little part of the huge scheme Google sheds light on.

 

[Keral_Patel]

This is definately not the whole formula or the factors on which the rankings depend. But it will atleast give some food for thoughts to the hungry minds.

 

[ennui]

Agree, and the page was last updated yesterday.

 

[MutoGen]

I don't agree with you. Page rank updates perennially. We can see changes 2 or 3 times a year.

 

[twoprime4you]

What you have there is the original patent for the pagerank formula, but the reason that you cannot use it as total roadmap is because google can give priority to any one factor at any time. There are a number of variables they can change priority of such as sitewide links, etc.

 

[ennui]

I don't agree with you. Page rank updates perennially. We can see changes 2 or 3 times a year.

No, I meant the page from Wikipedia where this article was published .

 

[Amnezia]

Its a hypothetical formula, its isnt the actual formula.

Plus its taken from an article from about 4 years ago, not particulary up to date.

As for it being critical knowledge, i don't think so. Pagerank is about as useful as alexa ranking.

 

[rishimodi]

You cannot collape alexa with pagerank. Alexa is based on number of people visit your site and pagerank has to do with incoming links to your site.

 

[Amnezia]

You cannot collape alexa with pagerank. Alexa is based on number of people visit your site and pagerank has to do with incoming links to your site.

i wasnt comparing what they were, i was comparing how useful they are. Which is pretty useless, unless you want to sell links.

 

[markhanrry]

so page rank is not important?

 

[Damion]

Thats what I always thought. I would've not trusted, but when resourse is wikipedia, I checked and really made lot of sense to me.

I would advise not to blindly follow everything that is being mentioned in Wikipedia, i have seen it happen frequently on forums, people referring to Wikipedia as the Uber authority on subjects and either cite a wrongfully statement (Since Wikipedia is a product of the online community and is vulnarable for manipulation) or completely misunderstanding what they are citing in the first place.

Also pagerank is not solely based on the amount of backlinks but combined with the quality of these backlinks defined by relevance as well.

 

[cerebus]

I don't agree with you. Page rank updates perennially. We can see changes 2 or 3 times a year.

No, there are PR updates continously. It has been confirmed by google reps several times that the pagerank values used in their algos are only pushed to the toolbar data every now and then though.

Also pagerank is not solely based on the amount of backlinks but combined with the quality of these backlinks defined by relevance as well.

Yes, as it clearly says all over the wikipedia article.

For the math interested I'm sure knowing the (original) pagerank algo can be nice, but all you really must know as a website owner is that backlinks from higher PR pages are better and quantity does add up - along with knowing PR values are _far_ from the single deciding factor in SERPs placements.