Golden Gate Bridge Suicides: Horrible Deaths that are Preventable

SpaceshipSpaceship
Watch

Kevin123

Established Member
Impact
17
Golden Gate Bridge Suicides: Horrible Deaths that are Preventable

by Kevin Caruso

February 22, 2007

“Everyone is better off without this fat, disgusting, boring girl.”

Marissa Imrie was just 14 when she wrote those words as part of her suicide note.

Later that day, Marissa jumped to her death from the Golden Gate Bridge.

She is one of some 1,250 known individuals who have died by suicide by jumping from the Golden Gate Bridge. We lose one person about every other week to the waters below, as the bridge somehow holds an allure to people who are suicidal.

Unfortunately, it is exceedingly easy to jump from the bridge. The rail is a mere 4-feet high, and thus virtually anyone can step over it in a second.

But why is the rail so low?

Answer: Because Joseph Strauss, the chief engineer of the bridge, was five feet tall and he wanted to be able to see over the rail, and thus changed the original planned height of the rail from 5½ feet to 4 feet.

But regardless of the original height of the rail, why hasn’t a suicide barrier been built? That is, why haven’t they built a high fence that is very difficult, or next to impossible, to climb?

Answer: There have been seven previous attempts at a suicide barrier, but the bridge bureaucracy precluded any of the plans from actually being implemented. An eighth attempt is currently underway.

It is appalling that the barrier was not put in place long ago, but arguments about aesthetics, bridge structure, and money have caused an endless morass to the blindingly obvious problem, which is this: The bridge is the equivalent of an easily-accessible, loaded handgun for countless suicidal individuals, and someone needs to take the damn gun away…and that is done by building a suicide barrier.

The situation has ALWAYS been urgent.

Back in 1937, when the construction on the Golden Gate Bridge was completed, no one envisioned that it would become one of the major suicide sites in the world.

But the suicides began almost immediately. In August of 1937, Harold Wobber, a veteran of World War I, strolled along the pedestrian walkway on the Golden Gate Bridge, paused, looked at a stranger and said, “This is as far as I go.” He then jumped to his death.

And to the mentally ill individuals who go to the bridge, a jump to the water below seems like a peaceful way to end to their pain.

[Please click the link below to read the rest of the stroy]

Golden Gate Bridge Suicides: Horrible Deaths that are Preventable

The article above is copyrighted by Kevin Caruso and Suicide.org
 
1
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
Unstoppable Domains — AI StorefrontUnstoppable Domains — AI Storefront
Errr .... :-/

That's um, great. Interesting, but rather random. :blink:

Stay in school, don't do drugs, and stay away from the edge. :notme:
 
0
•••
It's easy to jump from any high surface.. I don't see how you can blame it on a wall.
 
0
•••
Of course the following is just my opinion, so please don't take it for any more than that. I'm not a psyco therapist or anything, so...

If someone is so upset with their life that they have commited to the decision of killing themselves, they are most likely going to do it. If they aren't able to jump off the Golden Gate Bridge, they will find a viable alternative. Let's say they build an eight foot wall on the bridge; you're right, not as many people will jump off it. However, I bet you that many more people will shoot themselves, purposefully overdose, or rely upon other methods to end their misery. When it comes down to it, it's going to happen. Period.

On a side note, I thought that your article was very professional and well-writeen.
 
0
•••
If you want to kill yourself you'll do it... I walk over a bridge every day, and occasionally think hey if I gotted mugged they could just push me over the edge and I'd give them my money and laptop...
 
0
•••
the Tay Bridge where i live (famously collapsed 100 years ago D-:) is a hotspot for this sort of thing. Whenever someone jumps to there death from there, they always get washed up on the same bit of beach a few miles down the river as everyone else :td:
 
0
•••
jnadel said:
If someone is so upset with their life that they have commited to the decision of killing themselves, they are most likely going to do it. If they aren't able to jump off the Golden Gate Bridge, they will find a viable alternative. Let's say they build an eight foot wall on the bridge; you're right, not as many people will jump off it. However, I bet you that many more people will shoot themselves, purposefully overdose, or rely upon other methods to end their misery. When it comes down to it, it's going to happen. Period.

Agreed. If people can't do one thing, they will find another place to move to. Be it multistory car parks or bridges, the only way to prevent these kind of deaths is to level everything out to 1 storey.. which I have a strange feeling may not happen.
 
0
•••
Sabre said:
Agreed. If people can't do one thing, they will find another place to move to. Be it multistory car parks or bridges, the only way to prevent these kind of deaths is to level everything out to 1 storey.. which I have a strange feeling may not happen.

Or of course to wrap everyone in cotton wool, and monitor them at all times! ;)

>.<
 
0
•••
You know what gets me? Americans are so caught up in treating the symptom that they totally miss the cause. I could rant about this for hours, but I'll try to keep it a minimum. <side note>I'm an American, and have lived in America my whole life</side note>

This is one example of many that we try to take the easy way out. Another example of "treating the symptom" is cancer treatments or, for that matter, most medical procedures in America would make my point. I mention cancer because I am a cancer survivor. To be brief: Most doctors in America today will diagnose you with cancer, and tell you to begin treatment IMMEDIATELY. No questions asked. Chemo. Radiation. Now. This is not what I wanted to do. I was 18 at the time (3 years ago - wow), so I could make my own decision about that. I wanted to treat my body as holistically and naturally as possible. Treat the body as a whole, and take care of the CAUSE of cancer. Strengthen my immune system. Help my body fight cancer naturally. In the end, I did go through Chemo. (My decision). But I also went about it with a whole lot of other stuff.

What did I go on that rabbit trail? To make a point that Chemo treats the sympom - cancer. But we have to ask ourselves, "why did the person get cancer to begin with?" Once that question is asked, we must strengthen the immune system, and help the body NATURALLY take care of itself.

Ok, back to the bridge. See the relation? We build a wall to keep people from jumping. Guys, as people above have already said, if someone is to the point of jumping off a bridge, they WILL find a way to kill themselves. No questions asked.

What if we instead treated the cause? Reach out to the person, build a relationship w/ him, and help him get back onto his feet! For crying out loud, if we spent as much time and money counseling and encouraging folks as we do trying to figure out ways to keep them from killing themselves (building fences and walls) then I think this would be a different place.

We must treat the symptom. Even if it may cost more now, it will be better for us all.
 
0
•••
If someone wants to die, they will die. Even is everything is made uber-safe, they could starve themselves or something.
On a side note, is suicide so bad? The world is already overpopulated as disease dosn't kill as many people as it should, due to healthcare, and animals don't kill people because we don't live in caves and hunt. The world must have a limit of how many people it can sustain, and suicide helps us from not reaching that limit.
 
0
•••
They actually did a documentary movie about this called "The Bridge" If I remember correctly and even interviewed one guy who jumped and lived. The movie is not for the faint of heart

You can catch a trailer here at http://youtube.com/watch?v=Zwl-Pa_QT0M

It's amazing how quickly people are to judge those who commit suicide but the reality never hits you until someone comes to you personally and says "I want to kill myself" or "no one will miss me anymore." Then all of the sudden your knowledge of words usually escapes you and that cockiness is quickly subdued. I have been there before and would never like to be there again but before you judge so quickly at least take the time to consider that persons circumstances.

Yes, I know suicide is considered morally wrong in many religious rights be beliefs but when it comes down to it at the end of the day we all are just human beings.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Rudy, not to ruin your story or anything, but basically what you're saying is that you tried to go your own way and ended up going the proven way to save your life. I don't see how that relates to anything or makes a point at all.

The persons parents should be involved with their life and help them. If someone who is with them all the time isn't doing anything, there's no way anyone else could really notice it. It should be the person's idea to see a doctor and keep living.
 
0
•••
Laurence G said:
Or of course to wrap everyone in cotton wool, and monitor them at all times! ;)

>.<


How about rubber roads and sidewalks? That way they just bounce :P

(I'm just joking btw don't want to offend anyone)
 
0
•••
I think they should make it higher. And that was a very sad story.

The fact remains however that if people want to kill themselves they will find whatever means to do it unfortunately.


Skinny
 
0
•••
Dynadot — .com TransferDynadot — .com Transfer

We're social

Spaceship
Domain Recover
CatchDoms
NameMaxi - Your Domain Has Buyers
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back