This is not just in France but for the entire Earth. Placing links to websites does not create any liability without the valuable "snippit" allowed by BACKWARDS 17 USC §107. The link "Superbowl score 17-47" would not require any "tax" but "Superbowl score 17-47, Cowboys win." or "Superbowl score 17-47, nipples -2-." will require paying taxes to pay for usage with a license contingent on the site quoted or snippit'd.
You can see this now pending as proposed 47 USC §232 from page
14/18 from ARWD.USCOURT.gov server for $.1/pg or...
You can see this now pending as proposed 47 USC §232 from the
FREE PDF on a mirror but is NOT text searchable.
It was mentioned by the Times Record as delivered to Representative Steve Womack in person on October 24, 2012.
See "
Womack Meets With Constituents In Greenwood".
----------------------------------------
Text searchable HTML of 47 USC §
232 Section 10 follows.
---------------------------------------------
10. The Federal Communications Commission Wire Division shall develop and oversee the licensure and rating of published content so that republication or aggregation of content would require the republishing user to accept the “REP” licensing fee disclosed along with ratings of the licensed content such that;
a) payment of the licensing fee incentivizes broad disclosure of knowledge.
b) undisclosed directory licensing fees prevent disclosure of knowledge found and exempts the data from being indexed regardless of the source of disclosure of the data location.
c) the “REP” would provide for exclusive audience controls if desired by authors.
==============================================
In the very near future, NO INDECENCY will be allowed to be shown on wire or radio communications to the anonymous who could be children and this will
end AN OBVIOUS TWENTY-YEAR MISTAKE!
Read the complaint yourself. It is plain and clear.
Neeley Jr v FCC et al, (5:12-cv-5208)
^Complaint^. . . . . . . . . ^Docket^
----------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------
Regulation of internet wire communication and radio wire communication so that these are both SAFcc has been the statutory mission of the FCC since 1934! Read USC §151 from footnote #
2 of the complaint or at
cornell.edu.
Almost the entire domain name economy is utterly invalid.
I lost my cybersquatting complaint against NameMedia Inc but feel they were punished adequately with legal fees. Google Inc alleged to have spent half-a-million but filed in District Court having spent hundreds of thousands in order to have moral copy[rite] invalidated in the Western District of Arkansas and arguably in the entire USA.
I am not able to dedicate enough time to re-learn the hundreds of pages of
CurtisRes.com software that once ran Sleep Spot during February 19, 2003.
sleepspot.com. is now an utterly
useless domain except in demonstrating the fact that Google Inc and Microsoft Corporation should pay for creating the porn-ternet instead of prohibiting this massive devastation of culture.
See
SleepSpot.com from February 19, 2003. This is called demonstration of the "
scienter" needed to justify damages.
------------------------------------------
Per page
16/18 of the Complaint now filed the following is now pending in case you think only France, Brazil. and China will thumb their nose at Google Inc. Google Inc and Microsoft Corporation have till the end of this month to reply.
13. This District Court should invalidate all usage of 17 USC §107 fair-use to violate privacy while trespassing on private computers and indexing computers uninvited and invalidate 47 USC §230 claims for excusing violations of privacy while violating all other laws.
============================================
Waiting till the sky finishes falling.
