FMA got LH.com again?

[owntype]

You may have read the news or threads that Lufthansa has taken LH.com from FMA via UDRP.

The whois info/NS has been modified to Lufthansa's a few weeks ago.

But I checked today, it has been changed back to FMA's.

So FMA got LH.com again? Any updates on this case?

Thanks :kickass:

 

[Charley]

I would say yes. The whois now shows FMA.

 

[gazzip]

Excellent, I really hope it makes the newspapers and Luftansa gets a slagging for behaving like cheap thieves - numpties




.

 

[dotnom]

Is there any confirmation for this ?
If it's true i will dance owntype like your avatar

 

[owntype]

Yes, so anyone can confirm this to let dotnom free himself and dance on the board!

:bingo:

 

[squid]

If this is true, then this is awesome news for domaining. It will show that company's can't bully people out of the best domains. w00

 

[DomainTalker]

If this is true, its great....I'd really like to hear how FMA got the initial decision reversed...

Anyone know...?

 

[gazzip]

If this is true, its great....I'd really like to hear how FMA got the initial decision reversed...

me too, maybe he'll pop in and tell us



.

 

[dotnom]

A small note from the whois :
Updated Date: 30-may-2008

9 days after this nothing came out to the news

 

[Charley]

I hope we get an update.

A small note from the whois :
Updated Date: 30-may-2008

9 days after this nothing came out to the news

 

[dotnom]

Is there anyone we can ask from this board or other boards / sites ?

 

[Charley]

Is there anyone we can ask from this board or other boards / sites ?

The owner is a member on this board.

 

[dotnom]

The owner is a member on this board.

I know but i didn't hear anything from him, so i wondered if there is anyone close to him to verify this for us

 

[dgridley]

Being able to snag LL.com's like that is reprehensible IMO as they could stand for anything.. Hopefully FMA was able to recover.

 

[Charley]

I know but i didn't hear anything from him, so i wondered if there is anyone close to him to verify this for us

Here is his handle

http://www.namepros.com/member.php?u=1758

 

[dotnom]

I sent him a PM
If he can tell anything to us for this case will be good

 

[Peter]

I sent him a PM
If he can tell anything to us for this case will be good

I would urge you not to send on pm's like this. Last thing he wants is to be bombarded by pm's. If he chooses to let people know what is going on he will do it under his own accord.

 

[bmugford]

This whole thing was a load of crap to start with. When you see the letters "LH" does anyone really think of Lufthansa Airlines. No

 

[fonzie_007]

I would urge you not to send on pm's like this. Last thing he wants is to be bombarded by pm's. If he chooses to let people know what is going on he will do it under his own accord.

I completely agree. Don't bug people if they don't want to be bugged.

While I have not read the UDRP decision, if FMA lost the domain in UDRP, he most likely filled an injunction in US Federal Court to block the decision. In essence, this is an "appeal" of the UDRP decision. As far as I know, there have been very few people that have actually appealed to the federal court system (most likely due to cost and the fact most people who lose UDRP decisions would also lose a decision in federal court). Based on my limited knowledge of this situation (although I would need to read the decision to confirm), it appears FMA would have a viable chance of winning an appeal.

PS Mod may want to move this to the "legal" section of the forum to prevent bots from scanning this thread.

 

[footodors]

Does the federal court system work this fast? Seems it was just filed not long ago.