alert Epik Had A Major Breach

[DaveX]

Just read this. Looks like Epik may have been hacked and sensitive data compromised...

Read here:
https://domainnamewire.com/2021/09/14/hackers-claim-significant-epik-breach/

Thought I would share this.

 

[shoulda9393]

Nothing wrong with being a hacker. Epik shoulda have employed some.

There is plenty wrong with being a hacker with strong connections (self-proclaimed founder) to a criminal organzation taking the responsibility for the illegal dump. The illegal dump that the organzation leaked included personal info and password info of thousands of non-political customers.

 

[shoulda9393]

Hack the Planet.

Even organizations not particularly concerned with internet property rights, such as njalla would disagree with you here. Leaking failed passwords of nonpolitical people does not apply to this humanistic hacker ethos I'm sure you'd love to convey. While you haven't straight up admitted in public to hacking it, you've admitted to being the founder of the group claiming responsibility, and are celebrating the hack as a whole pretty much continuously on Twitter.

 

[Kirtaner]

Even organizations not particularly concerned with internet property rights, such as njalla would disagree with you here. Leaking failed passwords of nonpolitical people does not apply to this humanistic hacker ethos I'm sure you'd love to convey. While you haven't straight up admitted in public to hacking it, you've admitted to being the founder of the group claiming responsibility, and are celebrating the hack as a whole pretty much continuously on Twitter.

You know far less about the way the world works than you think

 

[shoulda9393]

What if I told you the CIA was offered the Epik data months before the public release?

I'm not really going to accept narratives from someone who self-professes to be the founder of a criminal enterprise.

The Hal Turner trolling was funny. The leak of failed passwords of non-political people isn't.

 

[shoulda9393]

be gay do crime

Noted that this is your opinion in case others in this thread want to continue to be chummy with you on Twitter and claim they are just neutral observers.

 

[Kirtaner]

Noted that this is your opinion in case others in this thread want to continue to be chummy with you on Twitter and claim they are just neutral observers.

So, what field office you from? Can you pull up my file, they won't give it to me ;_;

 

[SirDrago]

it has resulted in the boosting of several federal investigations, Anonymous essentially *helped* the FBI here.

Can you confirm this?

 

[shoulda9393]

If a goal or sidegoal was to help investigations into suspicious people who used this registrar, the hackers/leakers would have just sent the info to the FBI or whatever rather than leak failed passwords and EPP codes of all Epik customers regardless of political orientation, to the public.

The goal of the hackers/leakers seems pretty clear as an outside observer reaching a conclusion based on the girth of public posts. Their goal most likely being to settle a vendetta with an owner of a registrar or act on wrong info they received from those with a vendetta with the owner of the registrar.

 

[Evil.dll]

Even organizations not particularly concerned with internet property rights, such as njalla would disagree with you here. Leaking failed passwords of nonpolitical people does not apply to this humanistic hacker ethos I'm sure you'd love to convey. While you haven't straight up admitted in public to hacking it, you've admitted to being the founder of the group claiming responsibility, and are celebrating the hack as a whole pretty much continuously on Twitter.

Just to be clear… Real passwords were leaked along with the stored failed login attempts which should have never been saved. Most of the information was not secured in any way shape or form. Accusing Kirtaner of the hack without proper evidence to support that is a bad look, could even be defamatory in nature. I would spend more time elucidating you to your obvious lack of evidence to support your assertions, but, alas The F12 key is beckoning me. Believe it or not large corporations and government entities pay folks to hack them regularly. Inside we both know what’s going on, we know the game and we’re gonna play it… I just want to tell you how I’m feeling

 

[shoulda9393]

Just to be clear… Real passwords were leaked along with the stored failed login attempts which should have never been saved. Most of the information was not secured in any way shape or form. Accusing Kirtaner of the hack without proper evidence to support that is a bad look, could even be defamatory in nature. I would spend more time elucidating you to your obvious lack of evidence to support your assertions, but, alas The F12 key is beckoning me. Believe it or not large corporations and government entities pay folks to hack them regularly. Inside we both know what’s going on, we know the game and we’re gonna play it… I just want to tell you how I’m feeling

I'm not saying Aubrey did the hack himself personally. I'm saying he is claiming to be the founder of a criminal enterprise who is claiming responsibility for the hack and parading around as someone who is at least somewhat tied to the event.

And in response to criticism is advocating crimes in this thread.

 

[shoulda9393]

His bio also says 'hacker' and he is defending the actions taken by the hackers, if they were not him, on the basis of "the info was offered to the CIA". Someone claiming to have this much knowledge about the hack itself is someone who is at least somewhat involved in it. Whether or not he commited a crime in his involvement is not something I can conclude, but he is certainly advocating for crimes here, in the same language as the notes included in at least one of the initial hack releases.

 

[Kirtaner]

I'm not saying Aubrey did the hack himself personally. I'm saying he is claiming to be the founder of a criminal enterprise who is claiming responsibility for the hack and parading around as someone who is at least somewhat tied to the event.

And in response to criticism is advocating crimes in this thread.

One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws.

So... I wanna change the laws.

 

[shoulda9393]

One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws.

And what unjust laws have you disobeyed that makes it relevant to this thread, if any?

;edit now he just put "I want to change the laws" after my post

 

[Kirtaner]

And what unjust laws have you disobeyed that makes it relevant to this thread?

I double parked on the wrong side of the street on a Sunday morning between 4-6AM

 

[shoulda9393]

I double parked on the wrong side of the street on a Sunday morning between 4-6AM

That isn't relevant to this thread.

 

[Kirtaner]

That isn't relevant to this thread.

It was outside Epik's office

 

[SirDrago]

It was outside Epik's office

How many undercover surveillance officers did you block while you were there?

 

[shoulda9393]

Anyway I'm not a detective and can't do this work. If members of anonymous on Twitter want to continue to distance themselves from Aubrey, and his refusal to denounce past tweets or the leaking of passwords of left-wingers and non-political people in the dataset, they are free to do so.

If such people want to give info about his involvement in the hack, if any, they are also free to do so.

 

[Evil.dll]

I'm not saying Aubrey did the hack himself personally. I'm saying he is claiming to be the founder of a criminal enterprise who is claiming responsibility for the hack and parading around as someone who is at least somewhat tied to the event.

And in response to criticism is advocating crimes in this thread.

One persons crime is another’s bread and butter. Crime usually requires evidence of wrongdoing that gets taken to court and they decide. Your opinion on the other hand is just that. I respect that you have it, but it means nothing if you do not have evidence or experience to back it up. I have both. You may be king rich of domain speculation, but that means nothing in my world. Thanks for sharing.

 

[Kirtaner]

One persons crime is another’s bread and butter. Crime usually requires evidence of wrongdoing that gets taken to court and they decide. Your opinion on the other hand is just that. I respect that you have it, but it means nothing if you do not have evidence or experience to back it up. I have both. You may be king rich of domain speculation, but that means nothing in my world. Thanks for sharing.

I suggest they also research "prosecutorial discretion"