For the LLL.eu I believe mid $$$ is a minimum.
IMO it's one of the few interesting types of .eu. A decent acronym can be of interest to more than one company. I would also consider top generic keywords. As for the rest, I see little interest at present.
The problem is that Google does not show properly as they don't know where to place. European ccTLD's are preferred by Google, so it's pretty tough to get traffic on those.
Well .eu is a ccTLD for the EU rather than a TLD for Europe.Does anyone think that .EUROPE would make more sense in ALL of Europe as EU stands for only the European Union countries (and some of these countries actually refer to the European Union as UE)?
That's a regional TLD and it has not being doing well. It fell below 200K domains registered last week and is around 187K or so a the moment.The only continent TLD that exists now is .ASIA
It was never really that healthy in the first place. The months between March and September are always lower for .eu ccTLD because the traditional echo of the Junk Dump landrush anniversary phase happens at the end of April and many of the domains that were registered during the landrush or dropped and reregistered tend to get dropped again in this period. The drop between 01/April/2010 and 01/May/2010 was around 48K which is somewhat lower than last year's drop.I think the .eu market is pretty much dead now..am I wrong?
No. Europe is more than just the European Union. I ran a websurvey on the Irish webspace this week (over 250K websites) and the usage stats for identified Irish .eu domains are really bad (17.02% active). As an extension it is dead in Ireland and the UK.Do you guys think .EUROPE would be a better European extension than .EU?
Do you guys think .EUROPE would be a better European extension than .EU?
why using .europe if there is a .eu? no sense...
