-RJ- said:
Maybe. Seems like the novelty of these auctions is wearing thin.
I think it's kind of an ugly cycle happening, which honestly if Moniker could figure out how to improve certain things, could be stopped and they could have more successful auctions. I would have no problem with them if they did that - it would benefit the sellers, the industry, and even themselves if they did. The cycle as I see it:
1. Moniker increases their benefits in seller contracts, i.e. how long domains are binded with them, the upcoming "domain must be at Moniker or you pay $100", etc., plus in general 15% being a lot of commish.
2. Some people who would have submitted good names with good reserves don't like the terms and/or commission and don't submit.
3. The quality of names in each auction then suffers more and more. Traffic may be a step above the rest but even Traffic auctions seem to not quite attract what they used to be able to.
4. Each auction does worse than the previous (or in Traffic case each Traffic auction does worse than the previous).
5. #1 keeps happening for subsequent auctions, and #1 and #4 causes more of #2, which causes #3, which causes #4. Rather than understanding this and doing ANYTHING to make improvements in future auctions, Moniker instead keeps doing #1, serving themselves and not the people they are making 15% on. THAT is what I have a problem with. How many auctions has Moniker put on, and here after this last Traffic auction, they have the domains I sold, I paid for the domains I bought, and nothing's happening and they aren't communicating with me at all. I have to email them demanding what's going on in order to know what's going on.
As much as Domaintools has improvements to make as well, they DO make improvements on future auctions and DO seem to truly make an effort to create more positive experience for all involved. Moniker on the other hand...
Moniker HAS provided some great service at times in the past, and I do like some of the people I deal with that work there. I can even understand that with Oversee's acquisition of SnapNames, they may have had an "interesting" time having to combine with them for these auctions. But this lack of improvement and continually increasing their benefit in seller's contracts is nothing new.