discuss DOMAIN DISASTER: 6 Assets That Lost 56-95% of Their Value!

[CashproofAi]

Just published a sobering analysis of domains that turned into terrible investments. We found 6 domains that lost most of their value - one dropped 95%!

The article breaks down:

• Domains that lost 87% of their value in just 1-2 years
• The shocking 95% plunge of LongAssociates.com
• Why even strong sales history doesn't guarantee future value
• How to protect your own portfolio from depreciation

Full case study here:

 

[bmugford]

These domains didn't all "lose" value.

You just need to understand the difference between wholesale and retail sales.

I have sold countless domains like LongAssociates.com where you have a popular name + popular thing.

They are the type of domains you buy for ultra low $XXX and sell for a few thousand.

One is a wholesale sale, the other is a retail (end user) sale.

Brad

 

[Chris Co]

We found 6 domains

Who's we btw - you and ChatGPT?

 

[CashproofAi]

These domains didn't all "lose" value.

You just need to understand the difference between wholesale and retail sales.

I have sold countless domains like LongAssociates.com where you have a popular name + popular thing.

They are the type of domains you buy for ultra low $XXX and sell for a few thousand.

One is a wholesale sale, the other is a retail (end user) sale.

Brad

Fantastic analysis with clarification. The wholesale vs. retail distinction makes perfect sense.

Thanks for breaking that down.

 

[CashproofAi]

Who's we btw - you and ChatGPT?

It's just me. The thread is based on publicly available sales data.

The point remains that these were assets sold for a fraction of their purchase price, which is an interesting market phenomenon worth discussing.

If you disagree with the data, what's your take on it?

 

[VadimK]

 

[Simon SE]

op is determined. I'll give him that.

 

[CashproofAi]

Show attachment 288484

It definitely surprised me too — shocking 95% plunge! Thanks for checking out the thread.

 

[CashproofAi]

op is determined. I'll give him that.

Thanks — I’m just trying to give the community useful and verified data.

 

[Nathan K]

Quick question for @CashproofDomains.com - why is your previous website marked as unsafe by Google Safe Browsing?

 

[CashproofAi]

Quick question for @CashproofDomains.com - why is your previous website marked as unsafe by Google Safe Browsing?

Source: https://transparencyreport.google.com/safe-browsing/search?url=http://moneyblog2025.blogspot.com/&hl=en

That free blog was created by me almost a year ago when I entered blogging and was in learning, testing and trial phase.

Free Blog was then the best option to experiment.

At that time I was not aware of the rules of the blogger platform owned by Google.

Due to ignorance I put some referral links of PTC sites which were later went offline.
I also put some ads from Adsterra networks after watching some Youtube videos .
Later Adsterra network displayed some popunder Ads without my consent that violates the Google guidelines.
So that free blog was deleted.

This is the real reason. Nothing else. Now I have several other blogs running successfully interlinked to each others, there are no ads from any network.

Thanks for your research on me.

 

[URL Stream]

Fantastic analysis with clarification. The wholesale vs. retail distinction makes perfect sense.

Is that a full-fledged retraction?

Let's hope you are still within the time limits to edit your posts.

 

[CashproofAi]

Is that a full-fledged retraction?

Let's hope you are still within the time limits to edit your posts.

Not exactly.I just share data-driven findings as they come under my radar.

I hope they’re useful to the community, even if not everyone will agree with my perspective.

Different experiences lead to different viewpoints, and that’s okay

 

[byte]

op is determined. I'll give him that.

 

[Future Sensors]

The point remains that these were assets sold for a fraction of their purchase price, which is an interesting market phenomenon worth discussing.

Brad already covered this thoroughly. You're doing well digging into the data as a beginner, but your analysis stops short of drawing investor‑useful conclusions and offers no actionable information. You also ignore the tens of millions of domains that haven't sold and told us that you refuse to examine them, yet you still leap to broad claims about "the market". Really, you sound like a stuck turntable that refuses to change track.

 

[CashproofAi]

Brad already covered this thoroughly. You're doing well digging into the data as a beginner, but your analysis stops short of drawing investor‑useful conclusions and offers no actionable information. You also ignore the tens of millions of domains that haven't sold and told us that you refuse to examine them, yet you still leap to broad claims about "the market". Really, you sound like a stuck turntable that refuses to change track.

I don’t ignore anything, nor is that ever my intention. Whenever verifiable data about those 90% unsold domains comes under my radar, I analyze it thoroughly and share it with the community. I stick to factual, data-driven insights — not assumptions or speculation.

 

[CashproofAi]

Very rare possibilities. Because I have learned a lot from those real sales data towards which I am committed and focused . That's why, will never touch such domains whose value were so severely downgraded. I believe on facts and figures. May it looks unrealistic.

 

[CashproofAi]

The truth isn’t always comfortable, and data can sometimes highlight things we’d prefer not to see. I understand some may react strongly, but my goal is simply to present data-driven facts — even when they’re not pleasant.

Not everyone will agree, and that’s perfectly fine.

 

[Future Sensors]

The truth isn’t always comfortable, and data can sometimes highlight things we’d prefer not to see.

That's about you, I guess?

 

[CashproofAi]

That's about you, I guess?

No, not at all. The data I shared does not include any of my own domains. I understand that those who feel affected by the numbers may react critically, and that’s fine — the information is publicly available and transparent.

There’s little value in debating what ‘should be’ or ‘should not be.’ When criticism becomes personal or taken out of context, it doesn’t change the facts, and it doesn’t affect my motivation. I’ll continue sharing verified sales data for both multi-word and single-word domains so the community can benefit from real, measurable insights.