Does 4l.com with number have any value?

[annie sharma]

hey family,

does 4l.com with number have any value? for eg any random ones like kh9l.com or hs7k.com do they have any value? should i invest in such domains? even for flip purposes? thank you in advance, have a great day!

 

[Domain Lead Finder]

If it has a number in it then it is by definition not 4L. To answer your question, I think they have little investment potential, I do not see them being sought after by other investors.

 

[Apprich]

It could have some potential after all 4 hetero names being registered. Considering 3 hetero has good value.

 

[Tiger]

Chinese premium LLNN, NNLL, LNNN & NNNL patterns have recently gained a lot of value.

 

[Apprich]

Yes correct LLNN, NNLL, LNNN & NNNL have gain value because they were all registered out. But the question is how about others I haven't scan them for about long time, not sure what is the last status but it was like this in last time. If you look at the list, less combinations has more potential to finish earlier.

LLLN - 26000 - gone
LLNL - 175760
LNLL - 175760
NLLL - 175760
LLNN - 67600 - gone
LNLN - 67600 -
NLNL - 67600 -
NNLL - 67600 -
LNNN - 26000 - gone
NLNN - 26000
NNLN - 26000
NNNL - 26000 - gone

 

[jashan singh sekhon]

You can check namebio for similar sales, but such domains have certainly gained some value.

 

[Wannabean]

You can check namebio for similar sales, but such domains have certainly gained some value.

sales are unlikely to be over $100 in this category so namebio wont help.

 

[wcpthree]

sales are unlikely to be over $100 in this category so namebio wont help.

If the CHIP craze continues, it won't be long.

 

[Recons.Com]

I have got 6Hou.com but only because I live in Houston...

Random LLNL has long way to go. LNL is normally about 40 times less than similar LLL, so if random LLLL is $300, then random LLNL would be less than $10, i.e. reg fee. Chip LLNL could be around $50 by the same logic, but I'd say still reg fee, given very little end user potential.

Also, LL4L or LL2L would be better because 4=for and 2=to, so it could be meaningful...