IT.COM

Do You Buy Domains With A Bad History?

Spaceship Spaceship
Watch

MrOriginal

Established Member
Impact
22
Do you guys make it a habit to check the domains history via archive.org or screenshot prior to buying? What if you find a great name for sale but it was previously being used to sell porn or viagra. Do you still buy it? Will others still buy it from you?

I am coming from an SEO background and personally for the most part I wouldn't deal with such a domain because it would be penalized. But goals here are slightly different.
 
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
Do you guys make it a habit to check the domains history via archive.org or screenshot prior to buying? What if you find a great name for sale but it was previously being used to sell porn or viagra. Do you still buy it? Will others still buy it from you?

Yes. It does give me hesitation but if I really like the name, I might buy it and then try to scrub the backlinks and generally salvage the domain as much as possible
 
1
•••
There seem to be quite a few factors that influence search engines and vetting sites. In the past I've reg'd a few toxic names, and I've ended up dropping them, or selling them off at a discount.
Recently I picked up eLaunder.com , and that has a bad history of malware installation and other scams. It looked as if the dns had been intercepted, and surfers were being sent to a scam vault.
With all the hype about crypto currencies, I thought the name was worth reg fee, so I thought I'd see if |I could use it in some way. It was a lot easier than I thought, and the name now resolves to a basic Name Silo lander, so it's safe to visit the site now. It still has a lot of toxic history in the search engines though, and when I get the chance, I'll try to do something about that. In fact, this thread has given me the idea of using the site to discuss the laundering of toxic domain names.

More of a problem is the presence of "banned" words in a domain name. Leaving aside the obvious porn words, there are some that can cause a name to be blocked on a lot of the public WiFi and ISP filters. My domain FoxyTalk.com is one of these. I wanted to use it for a radio site in conjunction with my Fox Foo concept, but it seems the word "foxy" is a red light. I put a simple lander on the site, but I had to tether a mobile to do this in McDonalds, and I had to remove the adult filters to do this. Whilst this may not appear to be a problem at first sight, remember that a lot of businessmen stop for a coffee whilst travelling, and they often use the free WiFi. This can be a great time to get a sales message to them as they relax over a coffee.
 
0
•••
If the name is good enough yes I would.
Also, keep in mind that many legitimate and famous sites were hacked or hijacked at some point, and may have served porn or malware. So even great names can have stains in their history. It depends how serious and for how long the bad history did last.
Many years ago I bought a real estate domain that had been parked on a porn page for some time (probably a few months). I just checked in archive and there is not a trace.
 
0
•••
There seem to be quite a few factors that influence search engines and vetting sites. In the past I've reg'd a few toxic names, and I've ended up dropping them, or selling them off at a discount.
Recently I picked up eLaunder.com , and that has a bad history of malware installation and other scams. It looked as if the dns had been intercepted, and surfers were being sent to a scam vault.
With all the hype about crypto currencies, I thought the name was worth reg fee, so I thought I'd see if |I could use it in some way. It was a lot easier than I thought, and the name now resolves to a basic Name Silo lander, so it's safe to visit the site now. It still has a lot of toxic history in the search engines though, and when I get the chance, I'll try to do something about that. In fact, this thread has given me the idea of using the site to discuss the laundering of toxic domain names.

More of a problem is the presence of "banned" words in a domain name. Leaving aside the obvious porn words, there are some that can cause a name to be blocked on a lot of the public WiFi and ISP filters. My domain FoxyTalk.com is one of these. I wanted to use it for a radio site in conjunction with my Fox Foo concept, but it seems the word "foxy" is a red light. I put a simple lander on the site, but I had to tether a mobile to do this in McDonalds, and I had to remove the adult filters to do this. Whilst this may not appear to be a problem at first sight, remember that a lot of businessmen stop for a coffee whilst travelling, and they often use the free WiFi. This can be a great time to get a sales message to them as they relax over a coffee.

The problem isn't viruses though because that will pass once the nameservers and hosting is changed. The problem is that a previously bad site will still be treated as such when revived (even under a new brand) by google. And this would cause it in most cases to not rank in the search engine at all. Such a domain would require link disvows and a manual reconsideration by google in order to give it a new clean bill of health/reputation; something I have never done because I've seen it as not worth the effort when building a new site. Tbh I'm not even sure if it's foolproof either, and whether google will always take it off the bad list. This is why I never bother with such domains personally.

In regards to Foxy, that is interesting. I hadn't considered that public wi-fi would ban sites like that. I looked at the archives of Foxy and it used to be a forum unrelated to porn. Although the ads served up in parking later appeared to have considered it erotic related.
 
1
•••
In regards to Foxy, that is interesting. I hadn't considered that public wi-fi would ban sites like that. I looked at the archives of Foxy and it used to be a forum unrelated to porn. Although the ads served up in parking later appeared to have considered it erotic related.

That raises another issue. I've owned that name since 2007, and that forum may have been one of mine, I can't remember. The ads were as a result of parking it with OLN - the registrar for several years, and I didn't ever receive any income from the parking. I think I will use eLaunder to compile a list of task for cleaning toxic or tainted virtual assets. There can also be a problem resulting from tainted Bitcoins. The new(ish) disavow request for Google is certainly one useful option, but I'm not sure it removes the Google listings.
 
0
•••
I agree with anantj from above...a really good name with a bad rep can be repaired with time. It wont work with a flip but with time alot can be healed. I have several that were cleaned with time.
 
1
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back