- Impact
- 17
DNF hacked???
Have you seen this?
http://www.DNF
Wow, Im shocked!
Have you seen this?
http://www.DNF
Wow, Im shocked!
TheWatcher said:Step to follow:
- Buy new server
- Install the latest security patch
- Install the forum script
- install members profile, reset all password by default.
- Ask members to email their password.
- back in business.
You're back in less than 8 hours.
My 2 cent.
TheWatcher said:Step to follow:
- Buy new server
- Install the latest security patch
- Install the forum script
- install members profile, reset all password by default.
- Ask members to email their password.
- back in business.
You're back in less than 8 hours.
My 2 cent.
gatorgrad said:honestly though if you knew dnf just got hacked today and you see and email in your inbox allegedly from dnf asking for your password are you going to respond??
denny007 said:Use Freebsd or Solaris.
lau said::lol: Right,I agree your point.
denny007 said:If there exist a good backup
And do NOT use microsoft server, even Linux is not save anymore, use Freebsd or Solaris.
RoT said:why? All this stuff is in userspace anyway!
denny007 said:Only small percentage of servers in the world is running Freebsd, even less is running Solaris. So it is for a hacker uneconomical to search exploits for it. I.e. there does not exist any rootkit for BSD or Solaris (afaik).
RoT said:its more likely that the cracker used a php exploit rather than a remote kernel vulnerability
denny007 said:Didn't know Microsoft servers has something like "kernel"
RoT said:All operating system have a "kernel", and actually your statement is completely incorrect, the larger proportion of the internet runs on some variant of UNIX
denny007 said:With your sentence "its more likely that the cracker used a php exploit rather than a remote kernel vulnerability" I understood you are talking about DNF, which used MS.
Domagon said:Firstly, "hacker" verse "cracker" - technically, there is a distinction between the two terms, but as language usage changes so do meanings of things, especially when the original meaning was obscure to the bulk of the populace ... bottom line is that the layperson associates "hacker" with bad stuff...
RoT said:from wikipedia:
Just because windows kernel is inaccessable doesn't mean it doesn't have one
denny007 said:Thats why I wrote "Didn't know Microsoft servers has something like kernel" - and you wrote "your statement is completely incorrect, the larger proportion of the internet runs on some variant of UNIX" - so I am saying now "HUH ?"
TheWatcher said:I was a very active programmer during my highschool and college days back in late 80s. We use the word hacker to bring the best out of programming and create useful program. We called a hacker because of that ability.
Our friends in media overcooked the term "hacker" and sent the wrong message.
RoT said:I was refering to your statement:
"Only small percentage of servers in the world is running Freebsd, even less is running Solaris. So it is for a hacker uneconomical to search exploits for it. I.e. there does not exist any rootkit for BSD or Solaris (afaik)."
denny007 said:So ? I am not contradicting most servers is running some Unix. But most of Unix servers is running some version of Linux. Only small percentage is running BSD and even less Solaris (and AIX and VMS etc). Thats why hackers are not interested in it - they rather hack Linux or MS.
RoT said:umm, actually unix is not linux, linux is a branch of unix, and solaris IS unix
Domino said:Hi Denny...ColdGin here...I cannot reach the site...