Dynadot โ€” .com Registration $8.99

.mobi Developer Question: PHP or ASP.Net 2.0

Spaceship Spaceship
Watch

seanboy

Established Member
Impact
20
I've used both, although I'm more familiar with ASP.Net. I'm trying to use PHP but I don't find myself liking it. So, I was looking for some opinions from my fellow .mobi developers. What do you prefer, PHP or ASP.Net (2.0)? Any opinions would be appreciated.

Thanks,

Seanboy
 
Last edited:
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
Unstoppable DomainsUnstoppable Domains
Php :)
 
0
•••
I have not used either for .mobi yet, but I having been using php scripts for my .coms and they work great for me so far.
 
0
•••
PHP, I like ASP.net but not the OS it runs on.

I hate Windows Server's sorry :/

- Steve
 
0
•••
iNod said:
PHP, I like ASP.net but not the OS it runs on.

I hate Windows Server's sorry :/

- Steve

You can run ASP on different platforms now using "mono:"

http://www.mono-project.com/Main_Page

I've haven't tried mono, but I've heard positive things...
 
0
•••
I tried it.. I still prefer PHP anyways and Mono really limited ASP.

Thanks for the link, I will see how it is now..

- Steve
 
0
•••
I learned programming using object oriented concepts, so I'm way more familiar with java and asp.net. I like php, but its more confusing, so I'm going to have to go with asp. I'm sure that there are others out there using different technologies. For instance, has anyone tried .mobi development with coldfusion?
 
0
•••
seanboy if you are more familiar with OO then i would seriously suggest that you looked at Ruby on Rails
 
0
•••
channel5 said:
seanboy if you are more familiar with OO then i would seriously suggest that you looked at Ruby on Rails

Ruby on Rails is pretty nice. Does it work with mobile sites?
 
0
•••
Dynadot โ€” .com Registration $8.99Dynadot โ€” .com Registration $8.99
Appraise.net
Unstoppable Domains
Domain Recover
DomainEasy โ€” Zero Commission
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the pageโ€™s height.
Back