The online documentation seems pretty disorganized to me, and in any case I always learn a new system better with a decent book.
So of the books available that are specific to or updated to cover Joomla V1.5, which would be good for a reasonably experienced systems person with novice HTML/CSS skills and zip in CMS's? I played with Pivot a while ago and liked it but never had time to carry through. I need to learn "how to use it" to reasonably full potential, customizing, tweaking templates, 'brand-izing', etc, and I have the system and resources to learn it on (time being a killer, though).
In the past I've had good luck with the Peachpit press "Visual Quickstart" books but their Joomla book is still not out.
I've picked Joomla because we have interest at work, but also for future use in my own site development. Also because its been tested and actually runs fairly well in a VAMP environment (Thats VMS, aka OpenVMS, not Vista...). I've set up a test site based on their primer and its working fine, but the online docs leave something to be desired for 'discovery' as opposed to 'reference' use.
Thanks.
So of the books available that are specific to or updated to cover Joomla V1.5, which would be good for a reasonably experienced systems person with novice HTML/CSS skills and zip in CMS's? I played with Pivot a while ago and liked it but never had time to carry through. I need to learn "how to use it" to reasonably full potential, customizing, tweaking templates, 'brand-izing', etc, and I have the system and resources to learn it on (time being a killer, though).
In the past I've had good luck with the Peachpit press "Visual Quickstart" books but their Joomla book is still not out.
I've picked Joomla because we have interest at work, but also for future use in my own site development. Also because its been tested and actually runs fairly well in a VAMP environment (Thats VMS, aka OpenVMS, not Vista...). I've set up a test site based on their primer and its working fine, but the online docs leave something to be desired for 'discovery' as opposed to 'reference' use.
Thanks.








