

equity78 said:Oh absolutely, someone lost their mind. Because LLL.tv have always been $500 a year, if one wants to argue that $500 is a joke then that's fine. IMO that was reasonable with the min wholesale for a .com being $7000 to $8000. But now these lunatics are making LLL.tv $5000, $10,000. MGM.tv dropped obvious limited use and they made it $10,000. MGM could have regged it 8 years ago so they are not putting up $10,000. Anyone else interested has a potential UDRP unless they have a legitimate business using the acronym MGM. They are lost at Demand Media IMO, they just want the market to get better so they can go public and Rosenblatt and the VC can cash out. I have no problem with that been around that business a lot longer than domains. But they should have a clue at marketing an extension. AGAIN IMO
cosmicray said:.. equally interesting is those domainers that argue in their favor .. :cy:
gutsnglory said:Yup, happened the same thing to me... its a bit frustrating
I think this guy (Polin) have a script or something?? 4h 00 minutes 00 seconds and my name was regged
equity78 said:If you don't like premium pricing great, probably best to move along go invest in another tld because premium pricing is here in .tv and not going away.
MicroGuy said:These are the folks taking the gamble that all the money they're sending to Demand Media every year for premiums will be returned when .TV domains start selling like hotcakes and fetching huge prices.
Even if that does happen, in 5 years a $1000 premium must bring $5000 to reach break even and that's only going to happen "IF" the speculator picked a great domain "AND THEN" finds an interested buyer. It is possible but so is picking the winning horse at the track. Only at the track you can get 3:1 from time to time.
The new trend seems to be, the owner (registrant arguing in favor of premium prices) figures out he's losing money, drops the domain at which time Demand Media (aka Enom, aka domain hustlers) raises the renewal and waits patiently for another pocket to pick.
gwkg said:That seems to fit in line with the idea that they don't want domainers holding on to their names.
To use a previous example:
Why would they want someone holding on to Hardcore.tv trying to make a profit by a attaching a premimum on top of their premium? They priced it at $3K and that's what happened. So this time they priced it at $4500/yr to try and keep another domainer from grabbing it.
Having a middleman trying to make a profit makes it harder for them to get the domain in the hands of a company that will develop it, like Penthouse or Hustler.
equity78 said:Anyone else interested has a potential UDRP unless they have a legitimate business using the acronym MGM.
Len said:Hmmmm.....I've been following a domain for three weeks and sat up at 4;00am for the last 3 nights waiting for it to drop and frantically trying to reg. It finally dropped this morning only to be snatched up by Polin.... I'm really dissapointed as I now realise I had no possibility of regging this domain anyway.![]()
What chance do us mere mortals have in this game now that a handful hold all the cards??
Equity78 said:Demand Media came in and read the forum, spotted interest in certain names and categories and marked them up to prices Verisign never asked for. NO *** TV.tv was a premium until DEMAND MEDIA.
